This commit blanket renames the `rustc_macro` infrastructure to `proc_macro`,
which reflects the general consensus of #35900. A follow up PR to Cargo will be
required to purge the `rustc-macro` name as well.
std: Stabilize and deprecate APIs for 1.13
This commit is intended to be backported to the 1.13 branch, and works with the
following APIs:
Stabilized
* `i32::checked_abs`
* `i32::wrapping_abs`
* `i32::overflowing_abs`
* `RefCell::try_borrow`
* `RefCell::try_borrow_mut`
Deprecated
* `BinaryHeap::push_pop`
* `BinaryHeap::replace`
* `SipHash13`
* `SipHash24`
* `SipHasher` - use `DefaultHasher` instead in the `std::collections::hash_map`
module
Closes#28147Closes#34767Closes#35057Closes#35070
This commit is intended to be backported to the 1.13 branch, and works with the
following APIs:
Stabilized
* `i32::checked_abs`
* `i32::wrapping_abs`
* `i32::overflowing_abs`
* `RefCell::try_borrow`
* `RefCell::try_borrow_mut`
* `DefaultHasher`
* `DefaultHasher::new`
* `DefaultHasher::default`
Deprecated
* `BinaryHeap::push_pop`
* `BinaryHeap::replace`
* `SipHash13`
* `SipHash24`
* `SipHasher` - use `DefaultHasher` instead in the `std::collections::hash_map`
module
Closes#28147Closes#34767Closes#35057Closes#35070
rustdoc: Fix documenting rustc-macro crates
This commit adds a "hack" to the session to track whether we're a rustdoc
session or not. If we're rustdoc then we skip the expansion to add the
rustc-macro infrastructure.
Closes#36820
Enforce the shadowing restrictions from RFC 1560 for today's macros
This PR enforces a weakened version of the shadowing restrictions from RFC 1560. More specifically,
- If a macro expansion contains a `macro_rules!` macro definition that is used outside of the expansion, the defined macro may not shadow an existing macro.
- If a macro expansion contains a `#[macro_use] extern crate` macro import that is used outside of the expansion, the imported macro may not shadow an existing macro.
This is a [breaking-change]. For example,
```rust
macro_rules! m { () => {} }
macro_rules! n { () => {
macro_rules! m { () => {} } //< This shadows an existing macro.
m!(); //< This is inside the expansion that generated `m`'s definition, so it is OK.
} }
n!();
m!(); //< This use of `m` is outside the expansion, so it causes the shadowing to be an error.
```
r? @nrc
In another attempt to fix#36793 this commit attempts to head off any future
problems by adding a custom `WidentUsizeHasher` which will widen any hashing of
`isize` and `usize` to a `u64` as necessary. This obviates the need for a
previous number of `as u64` annotations and will hopefully protect us against
future problems here.
Closes#36793 (hopefully)
This commit adds a "hack" to the session to track whether we're a rustdoc
session or not. If we're rustdoc then we skip the expansion to add the
rustc-macro infrastructure.
Closes#36820
Move MIR towards a single kind of local
This PR modifies MIR to handle function arguments (`Arg`), user-defined variable bindings (`Var`), compiler-generated temporaries (`Tmp`), as well as the return value pointer equally. All of them are replaced with a single `Local` type, a few functions for iterating over different kinds of locals, and a way to get the kind of local we're dealing with (mainly used in the constant qualification/propagation passes).
~~I haven't managed to fix one remaining issue: A `StorageDead` not getting emitted for a variable (see the `TODO` in the test). If that's fixed, this is basically good to go.~~ Found the issue (an off-by-one error), fix incoming.
r? @eddyb for changes to constant qualification and propagation I'm not quite sure about
add a panic-strategy field to the target specification
Now a target can define its panic strategy in its specification. If a
user doesn't specify a panic strategy via the command line, i.e. '-C
panic', then the compiler will use the panic strategy defined by the
target specification.
Custom targets can pick their panic strategy via the "panic-strategy"
field of their target specification JSON file. If omitted in the
specification, the strategy defaults to "unwind".
closes#36647
---
I checked that compiling an executable for a custom target with "panic-strategy" set to "abort" doesn't need the "eh_personality" lang item and also that standard crates compiled for that custom target didn't contained undefined symbols to _Unwind_Resume. But this needs an actual unit test, any suggestion on how to test this?
Most of the noise in the diff is due to moving `PanicStrategy` from the `rustc` to the `rustc_back` crate.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @phil-opp
Allow supplying an error destination via the compiler driver
Allows replacing stderr with a buffer from the client.
Also, some refactoring around run_compiler.
This applies the HIR changes from the previous commits to the AST, and
is thus a syntax-[breaking-change]
Renames `PatKind::Vec` to `PatKind::Slice`, since these are called slice
patterns, not vec patterns. Renames `TyKind::Vec`, which represents the
type `[T]`, to `TyKind::Slice`. Renames `TyKind::FixedLengthVec` to
`TyKind::Array`.
Now a target can define its panic strategy in its specification. If a
user doesn't specify a panic strategy via the command line, i.e. '-C
panic', then the compiler will use the panic strategy defined by the
target specification.
Custom targets can pick their panic strategy via the "panic-strategy"
field of their target specification JSON file. If omitted in the
specification, the strategy defaults to "unwind".
closes#36647
rustc: implement -C link-arg
this flag lets you pass a _single_ argument to the linker but can be
used _repeatedly_. For example, instead of using:
```
rustc -C link-args='-l bar' (..)
```
you could write
```
rustc -C link-arg='-l' -C link-arg='bar' (..)
```
This new flag can be used with RUSTFLAGS where `-C link-args` has
problems with "nested" spaces:
```
RUSTFLAGS='-C link-args="-Tlayout.ld -nostartfiles"'
```
This passes three arguments to rustc: `-C` `link-args="-Tlayout.ld` and
`-nostartfiles"` to `rustc`. That's not what we meant. But this does
what we want:
```
RUSTFLAGS='-C link-arg=-Tlayout.ld -C link-arg=-nostartfiles`
```
cc rust-lang/rfcs#1509
r? @alexcrichton
cc @Zoxc
This needs a test. Any suggestion?
refactor to remove trans::adt and make rustc::ty::layout authoritative
I asked on IRC about optimizing struct layout by reordering fields from most-aligned to least-aligned and somehow ended up getting talked into doing this. The goal here is to make `layout` authoritative and to remove `adt`. The former has been accomplished by reimplementing `represent_type_uncached` and the latter is in progress. @eddyb thought I should make the PR now.
My plan is to reserve the actual optimization for a second PR, as this work is useful by itself.
