So far `librustc::trans::base::trans_fn()` and `trans_closure()` have been passed the list of attributes on the function being translated *only* if the function was local and non-generic. For generic functions, functions inlined from other crates, functions with foreign ABI and for closures, only an empty list of attributes was ever passed to `trans_fn()`.
This led to the case that generic functions marked with `#[rustc_mir]` where not actually translated via MIR but via the legacy translation path.
This PR makes function/closure attributes always be passed to `trans_fn()` and disables the one test where this makes a difference.
If there is an actual reason why attributes were not passed along in these cases, let me know.
cc @rust-lang/compiler
cc @luqmana regarding the test case
Add OpAssign to Wrapping<T>, plus fix some problems in core::num::wrapping
including, but not limited to:
* Testing Wrapping<T>
* Pull out a lot of broken code that doesn't need to be there with the new stage0 compiler
* Adding Rem and RemAssign to Wrapping<T>
* Removed 3 (assumed accidental) re-exports, which is a minor [breaking-change].
* Change shl and shr to take all integer types, instead of a usize; this is a more major [breaking-change], because of values that were inferred before, but brings us in line with the integer shifts.
Fixes#30524 and #30523
This is not a fix to checks themselves per se (though we still use `Eq` MIR test instead of calling `PartialEq::eq`), but rather how we handle items we encounter in pattern position.
Previously we would just call `PartialEq` with the constant and the matchee, but now we essentially inline the constant instead. E.g. these two snippets are functionally equivalent at MIR level:
```
match val { Some(42) => true, _ => false }
```
and
```
const SECRET: Option<u8> = Some(42);
match val { SECRET => true, _ => false }
```
This approach also allows for more optimizations of matches. I.e. It can now exploit `SwitchInt` to switch on number inside a `Some` regardless of whether the value being an item or not.
This is based on @tsion’s already approved PR so I could reuse the file for more tests.
r? @eddyb
cc @nikomatsakis @tsion
This moves back (essentially reverts #30265) into MIR-specific translation code, but keeps the
funcition split out, since it is expected to eventually become recursive.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29572
cc @oli-obk
Since `darwin` is really `apple-darwin`, the valgrind-rpass tests were not actually being run with valgrind on mac before. Also, the `HOST` check was completely wrong.
r? @alexcrichton
The previous version using `PartialOrd::le` was broken since it passed `T` arguments where `&T` was expected.
It makes sense to use primitive comparisons since range patterns can only be used with chars and numeric types.
r? @eddyb
The current help message is too much about "normal" macros to be used
as general message. Keep it for normal macros, and add custom help and
error messages for macro definitions.
The current help message is too much about "normal" macros to be used
as general message. Keep it for normal macros, and add custom help and
error messages for macro definitions.
This moves back (essentially reverts #30265) into MIR-specific translation code, but keeps the
funcition split out, since it is expected to eventually become recursive.
Types like `&AssertRecoverSafe<T>` and `Rc<AssertRecoverSafe<T>>` were
mistakenly not considered recover safe, but the point of the assertion wrapper
is that it indeed is! This was caused by an interaction between the
`RecoverSafe` and `NoUnsafeCell` marker traits, and this is updated by adding an
impl of the `NoUnsafeCell` marker trait for `AssertRecoverSafe` to ensure that
it never interacts with the other negative impls of `RecoverSafe`.
cc #30510
Types like `&AssertRecoverSafe<T>` and `Rc<AssertRecoverSafe<T>>` were
mistakenly not considered recover safe, but the point of the assertion wrapper
is that it indeed is! This was caused by an interaction between the
`RecoverSafe` and `NoUnsafeCell` marker traits, and this is updated by adding an
impl of the `NoUnsafeCell` marker trait for `AssertRecoverSafe` to ensure that
it never interacts with the other negative impls of `RecoverSafe`.
cc #30510
Add note when item accessed from module via `m.i` rather than `m::i`.
(I tried to make this somewhat future-proofed, in that the `UnresolvedNameContext` could be expanded in the future with other cases besides paths that are known to be modules.)
This supersedes PR #30356 ; since I'm responsible for a bunch of new code here, someone else should review it. :)
this PR reverts previous ones, that tried to make `cc` to found `estdc++` in `/usr/local/lib`. It causes more trouble than it resolvs things: rustc become unbuildable if another version already exists in `/usr/local` (for example, `libstd-xxxx.so` is found in `/usr/local/lib` and in builddir).
so this PR tries another way to achieve build, but using the good linker for building. By default, rustc use `cc` for linking. But under OpenBSD, `cc` is gcc 4.2.1 from base, whereas we build with gcc 4.9 from ports. By linking using the compiler found at compile-time, we ensure that the compiler will found his own stdc++ library without trouble.
r? @alexcrichton
By default, rustc use `cc` as linker. Under OpenBSD, `cc` is gcc version 4.2.1.
So use the compiler found at configure-time for linking: it will be gcc 4.9.
It permits to resolv problem of finding -lestdc++ or -lgcc. For base gcc (4.2), there are in not standard path, whereas for ports gcc (4.9) there are in standard path.
