Break out of the correct number of scopes in loops
We were incorrectly breaking out of one too many drop scopes when
generating MIR for loops and breakable blocks, resulting in use after
free and associated borrow checker warnings.
This wasn't noticed because the scope that we're breaking out of twice
is only used for temporaries that are created for adjustments applied to
the loop. Since loops generally propagate coercions to the `break`
expressions, the only case we see this is when the type of the loop is a
smart pointer to a trait object.
Closes#62312
We were incorrectly breaking out of one too many drop scopes when
generating MIR for loops and breakable blocks, resulting in use after
free and associated borrow checker warnings.
This wasn't noticed because the scope that we're breaking out of twice
is only used for temporaries that are created for adjustments applied to
the loop. Since loops generally propagate coercions to the `break`
expressions, the only case we see this is when the type of the loop is a
smart pointer to a trait object.
I also added `// skip-codegen` to each one, to address potential concerns
that this change would otherwise slow down our test suite spending time
generating code for files that are really just meant to be checks of
compiler diagnostics.
(However, I will say: My preference is to not use `// skip-codegen` if
one can avoid it. We can use all the testing of how we drive LLVM that
we can get...)
(Updated post rebase.)
