Commit graph

278 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ThePuzzlemaker
b287806d38
Add regression test for #79458 2020-12-01 13:30:09 -06:00
Camelid
82dc99ba7a Use the name "auto traits" everywhere in the compiler
Goodbye, OIBIT!
2020-11-24 16:25:43 -08:00
Camelid
810324d1f3 Rename optin_builtin_traits to auto_traits
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.

There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.

Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
2020-11-23 14:14:06 -08:00
Bastian Kauschke
69b43c209c improve error message for const ty param mismatch 2020-11-16 16:07:59 +01:00
Santiago Pastorino
708fc3b1a2
Add unsized_fn_params feature 2020-10-27 14:45:02 -03:00
Matthew Jasper
50dde2e4d8 Normalize when finding trait object candidates 2020-10-22 08:18:29 +01:00
Yuki Okushi
89c98cd6b4
Rollup merge of #78063 - camelid:improve-cannot-multiply-error, r=estebank
Improve wording of "cannot multiply" type error

For example, if you had this code:

    fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
        x * y
    }

You would get this error:

    error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x * y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`

However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:

    error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x / y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`

So that's what this change does. It changes this:

    error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x * y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`

To this:

    error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x * y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
2020-10-21 13:59:39 +09:00
Esteban Küber
88f5e110db review comments 2020-10-20 09:26:15 -07:00
Esteban Küber
ae0e3d0511 Tweak "object unsafe" errors
Fix #77598.
2020-10-20 09:26:14 -07:00
SNCPlay42
71ca239f80 don't assume trait ambiguity happens in Self 2020-10-19 21:11:40 +01:00
Camelid
7b33ae642e Improve wording of "cannot multiply" type error
For example, if you had this code:

    fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
        x * y
    }

You would get this error:

    error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x * y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`

However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:

    error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x / y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`

So that's what this change does. It changes this:

    error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x * y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`

To this:

    error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
     --> src/lib.rs:2:7
      |
    2 |     x * y
      |       ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
      |
      = help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
2020-10-17 22:19:25 -07:00
Yuki Okushi
59cc9de039 Add test for issue-75983 2020-10-18 07:57:24 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
11a188a194 Add test for issue-70944 2020-10-18 07:57:24 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
f7150be674 Suggest minimal subset features in incomplete_features lint 2020-10-17 02:01:08 +09:00
Esteban Küber
4ae8f6ec7c address review comments 2020-10-09 22:00:48 -07:00
Esteban Küber
5e23cc4960 Given <T as Trait>::A: Ty suggest T: Trait<A = Ty>
Fix #75829
2020-10-09 14:44:24 -07:00
Esteban Küber
e89ce461d3 Suggest removing bounds even when potential typo 2020-10-09 14:44:24 -07:00
Esteban Küber
5217007a20 Tweak output and add test cases 2020-10-09 14:44:24 -07:00
Esteban Küber
711760c8ec Point out why a trait is expected on Struct + 'lt 2020-10-09 14:44:24 -07:00
Matthew Jasper
022c148fcd Fix tests from rebase 2020-10-06 11:19:33 +01:00
Matthew Jasper
e42c97919c Don't require lifetime super-bounds on traits apply to trait objects of that trait 2020-10-06 11:19:32 +01:00
Matthew Jasper
596d6c4b3b Avoid cycle with projections from object types
Normalizing `<dyn Iterator<Item = ()> as Iterator>::Item` no longer
requires selecting `dyn Iterator<Item = ()>: Iterator`. This was
previously worked around by using a special type-folder to normalize
things.
2020-10-06 11:19:31 +01:00
Matthew Jasper
f52b2d8890 Avoid cycle in nested obligations for object candidate
Bounds of the form `type Future: Future<Result=Self::Result>` exist in
some ecosystem crates. To validate these bounds for trait objects we
need to normalize `Self::Result` in a way that doesn't cause a cycle.
2020-10-06 11:19:31 +01:00
Matthew Jasper
042464f75a Fix tests and bootstrap 2020-10-06 11:19:30 +01:00
Matthew Jasper
2bdf723da7 Ensure that associated types for trait objects satisfy their bounds 2020-10-06 11:19:30 +01:00
Matthew Jasper
f958e6c246 Separate bounds and predicates for associated/opaque types 2020-10-06 11:19:29 +01:00
Dylan DPC
5fa978fa1b
Rollup merge of #75928 - JulianKnodt:non_utf8, r=estebank
Remove trait_selection error message in specific case

In the case that a trait is not implemented for an ADT with type errors, cancel the error.

Fixes #75627
2020-10-05 02:29:25 +02:00
Dan Aloni
51742be6d8 specialization_graph: avoid trimmed paths for OverlapError 2020-09-03 14:09:50 +03:00
Dan Aloni
07e7823c01 pretty: trim paths of unique symbols
If a symbol name can only be imported from one place for a type, and
as long as it was not glob-imported anywhere in the current crate, we
can trim its printed path and print only the name.

This has wide implications on error messages with types, for example,
shortening `std::vec::Vec` to just `Vec`, as long as there is no other
`Vec` importable anywhere.

This adds a new '-Z trim-diagnostic-paths=false' option to control this
feature.

On the good path, with no diagnosis printed, we should try to avoid
issuing this query, so we need to prevent trimmed_def_paths query on
several cases.

This change also relies on a previous commit that differentiates
between `Debug` and `Display` on various rustc types, where the latter
is trimmed and presented to the user and the former is not.
2020-09-02 22:26:37 +03:00
kadmin
8894b366fd Remove error message in specific case
In the case that a trait is not implemented for an ADT with type errors, cancel the error.
2020-08-30 19:39:51 +00:00
Aaron Hill
e3cd43eb00
Use smaller def span for functions
Currently, the def span of a funtion encompasses the entire function
signature and body. However, this is usually unnecessarily verbose - when we are
pointing at an entire function in a diagnostic, we almost always want to
point at the signature. The actual contents of the body tends to be
irrelevant to the diagnostic we are emitting, and just takes up
additional screen space.

This commit changes the `def_span` of all function items (freestanding
functions, `impl`-block methods, and `trait`-block methods) to be the
span of the signature. For example, the function

```rust
pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T { val }
```

now has a `def_span` corresponding to `pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T`
(everything before the opening curly brace).

Trait methods without a body have a `def_span` which includes the
trailing semicolon. For example:

```rust
trait Foo {
    fn bar();
}```

the function definition `Foo::bar` has a `def_span` of `fn bar();`

This makes our diagnostic output much shorter, and emphasizes
information that is relevant to whatever diagnostic we are reporting.

We continue to use the full span (including the body) in a few of
places:

* MIR building uses the full span when building source scopes.
* 'Outlives suggestions' use the full span to sort the diagnostics being
  emitted.
* The `#[rustc_on_unimplemented(enclosing_scope="in this scope")]`
attribute points the entire scope body.
* The 'unconditional recursion' lint uses the full span to show
  additional context for the recursive call.

All of these cases work only with local items, so we don't need to
add anything extra to crate metadata.
2020-08-22 18:41:49 -04:00
Esteban Küber
0afb9c28bb Tweak output of E0225
When encountering multiple non-auto trait bounds suggest creating a new
trait and explain what auto-traits are.
2020-08-14 12:08:49 -07:00
mark
2c31b45ae8 mv std libs to library/ 2020-07-27 19:51:13 -05:00
Yuki Okushi
a11024f4f3
Fix debug assertion in typeck 2020-07-18 12:20:51 +09:00
Esteban Küber
c38b127d84 Remove redundant explanatory note for type parameters 2020-07-14 12:19:44 -07:00
Esteban Küber
d989796b47 Suggest borrowing in more unsized fn param cases 2020-07-14 10:50:24 -07:00
Esteban Küber
b7db6bb5af Remove Sized on_unimplemented note 2020-07-14 10:50:24 -07:00
Esteban Küber
28e6f1f5b9 Suggest boxing or borrowing unsized fields 2020-07-14 10:50:24 -07:00
Esteban Küber
a15bda4036 Point at type on E0275 instead of whole field 2020-07-14 10:50:24 -07:00
Manish Goregaokar
7fb7765cda
Rollup merge of #73674 - estebank:op-trait-bound-suggestion, r=davidtwco
Tweak binop errors

* Suggest potentially missing binop trait bound (fix #73416)
* Use structured suggestion for dereference in binop
2020-06-25 18:00:23 -07:00
Esteban Küber
8f40dae93b Suggest type param trait bound for binop only when appropriate
Verify that the binop trait *is* implemented for the types *if* all the
involved type parameters are replaced with fresh inferred types. When
this is the case, it means that the type parameter was indeed missing a
trait bound. If this is not the case, provide a generic `note` refering
to the type that doesn't implement the expected trait.
2020-06-24 16:17:04 -07:00
Esteban Küber
5aab1a9a88 Tweak binop errors
* Suggest potentially missing binop trait bound (fix #73416)
* Use structured suggestion for dereference in binop
2020-06-23 17:32:06 -07:00
Manish Goregaokar
a1404a93f9
Rollup merge of #72456 - ldm0:dereftrait, r=estebank
Try to suggest dereferences on trait selection failed

Fixes #39029 Fixes #62530
This PR consists of two parts:
1. Decouple `Autoderef` with `FnCtxt` and move `Autoderef` to `librustc_trait_selection`.
2. Try to suggest dereferences when trait selection failed.

The first is needed because:
1. For suggesting dereferences, the struct `Autoderef` should be used. But before this PR, it is placed in `librustc_typeck`, which depends on `librustc_trait_selection`. But trait selection error emitting happens in `librustc_trait_selection`, if we want to use `Autoderef` in it, dependency loop is inevitable. So I moved the `Autoderef` to `librustc_trait_selection`.
2. Before this PR, `FnCtxt` is coupled to `Autoderef`, and `FnCtxt` only exists in `librustc_typeck`. So decoupling is needed.

After this PR, we can get suggestion like this:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&Baz: Happy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/trait-suggest-deferences-multiple.rs:34:9
   |
LL | fn foo<T>(_: T) where T: Happy {}
   |                          ----- required by this bound in `foo`
...
LL |     foo(&baz);
   |         ^^^^
   |         |
   |         the trait `Happy` is not implemented for `&Baz`
   |         help: consider adding dereference here: `&***baz`

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
```

r? @estebank
2020-06-20 14:44:50 -07:00
Donough Liu
f1e07103d3 Prevent incorrect help message for dereference suggestion 2020-06-20 20:00:36 +08:00
Donough Liu
ef68bf3929 Try to suggest dereferences when trait selection failed. 2020-06-20 18:53:59 +08:00
Manish Goregaokar
61f8c3ef27
Rollup merge of #73452 - matthewjasper:auto-rec, r=nikomatsakis
Unify region variables when projecting associated types

This is required to avoid cycles when evaluating auto trait predicates.
Notably, this is required to be able add Chalk types to `CtxtInterners` for `cfg(parallel_compiler)`.

r? @nikomatsakis
2020-06-19 19:43:07 -07:00
Manish Goregaokar
203305d095
Rollup merge of #71420 - RalfJung:specialization-incomplete, r=matthewjasper
Specialization is unsound

As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31844#issuecomment-617013949, it might be a good idea to warn users of specialization that the feature they are using is unsound.

I also expanded the "incomplete feature" warning to link the user to the tracking issue.
2020-06-19 19:42:43 -07:00
matthewjasper
ba2ef58ae6 Unify region variables when projecting associated types
This is required to avoid cycles when evaluating auto trait
predicates.
2020-06-17 19:46:15 +01:00
Ralf Jung
5fbef22a44 warn against 'specialization' feature 2020-06-16 09:39:34 +02:00
Aaron Hill
8956a7f581
Only display other method receiver candidates if they actually apply
Previously, we would suggest `Box<Self>` as a valid receiver, even if
method resolution only succeeded due to an autoderef (e.g. to `&self`)
2020-06-15 15:15:35 -04:00