Detect if-else chains with a missing final else in type errors
```
error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
--> $DIR/if-else-chain-missing-else.rs:12:12
|
LL | let x = if let Ok(x) = res {
| ______________-
LL | | x
| | - expected because of this
LL | | } else if let Err(e) = res {
| | ____________^
LL | || return Err(e);
LL | || };
| || ^
| ||_____|
| |_____`if` and `else` have incompatible types
| expected `i32`, found `()`
|
= note: `if` expressions without `else` evaluate to `()`
= note: consider adding an `else` block that evaluates to the expected type
```
We probably want a longer explanation and fewer spans on this case.
Partially address #133316.
Add gpu-kernel calling convention
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit f6b21e90d1 (#120495 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16463) due to inactivity in the amdgpu target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to `ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust compiles for.
Tracking issue: #135467
amdgpu target tracking issue: #135024
Use trait definition cycle detection for trait alias definitions, too
fixes#133901
In general doing this for `All` is not right, but this code path is specifically for traits and trait aliases, and there we only ever use `All` for trait aliases.
Fix overflows in the implementation of `overflowing_literals` lint's help
This PR fixes two overflow problems that cause the `overflowing_literals` lint to behave incorrectly in some edge cases.
1. When an integer literal is between `i128::MAX` and `u128::MAX`, an overflowing `as` cast can cause the suggested type to be overly small. It's fixed by using checked type conversion and returning `u128` when it's the only choice. (Fixes#135248)
2. When an integer literal is `i128::MIN` but is of a smaller type, an overflowing negation cause the compiler to panic in debug build. Fixed by checking the number size beforehand and `wrapping_neg`. (Fixes#131849)
Edit: extracted the type conversion part into a standalone function to separate the concern of overflowing.
```
error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
--> $DIR/if-else-chain-missing-else.rs:12:12
|
LL | let x = if let Ok(x) = res {
| ______________-
LL | | x
| | - expected because of this
LL | | } else if let Err(e) = res {
| | ____________^
LL | || return Err(e);
LL | || };
| || ^
| ||_____|
| |_____`if` and `else` have incompatible types
| expected `i32`, found `()`
|
= note: `if` expressions without `else` evaluate to `()`
= note: consider adding an `else` block that evaluates to the expected type
```
We probably want a longer explanation and fewer spans on this case.
Partially address #133316.
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit
f6b21e90d1 due to inactivity in the amdgpu
target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to
`ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust
compiles for.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135497 (fix typo in typenames of pin documentation)
- #135522 (add incremental test for issue 135514)
- #135523 (const traits: remove some known-bug that do not seem to make sense)
- #135535 (Add GUI test for #135499)
- #135541 (Methods of const traits are const)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
const traits: remove some known-bug that do not seem to make sense
These tests were made to point to #103507 in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114134; I think that was a mistake: that issue is about a rather specific problem, and most tests marked as known-bug in that PR are pointing at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110395 which makes more sense.
Of the 4 tests that still point to #103507:
- One is [the original test](2088260852/tests/ui/impl-trait/normalize-tait-in-const.rs). It still fails to compile, though currently for unrelated reasons (`~const Fn` is not valid as that is not a const trait). I made it point at #110395 like all the other tests that were disabled when the previous const trait impl was removed.
- One is being fixed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135423
- The other two are fixed in this PR
The errors we are getting here are not great but they do look correct?
FWIW there are still a whole lot of tests mentioning #110395 despite that issue being closed... I hope someone is tracking that.^^
r? `@compiler-errors`
Prefer lower `TraitUpcasting` candidates in selection
Fixes#135463. The underlying cause is this ambiguity, but it's more clear (and manifests as a coercion error, rather than a MIR validation error) when it's written the way I did in the UI test.
Sorry this is cursed r? lcnr
deprecate `std::intrinsics::transmute` etc, use `std::mem::*` instead
The `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` attribute lets users call `std::mem::transmute` as `std::intrinsics::transmute`. The former is a reexport of the latter, and for a long time we didn't properly check stability for reexports, so making this a hard error now would be a breaking change for little gain. But at the same time, `std::intrinsics::transmute` is not the intended path for this function, so I think it is a good idea to show a deprecation warning when that path is used. This PR implements that, for all the functions in `std::intrinsics` that carry the attribute.
I assume this will need ``@rust-lang/libs-api`` FCP.
Treat safe target_feature functions as unsafe by default [less invasive variant]
This unblocks
* #134090
As I stated in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134090#issuecomment-2541332415 I think the previous impl was too easy to get wrong, as by default it treated safe target feature functions as safe and had to add additional checks for when they weren't. Now the logic is inverted. By default they are unsafe and you have to explicitly handle safe target feature functions.
This is the less (imo) invasive variant of #134317, as it doesn't require changing the Safety enum, so it only affects FnDefs and nothing else, as it should.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132397 (Make missing_abi lint warn-by-default.)
- #133807 (ci: Enable opt-dist for dist-aarch64-linux builds)
- #134143 (Convert `struct FromBytesWithNulError` into enum)
- #134338 (Use a C-safe return type for `__rust_[ui]128_*` overflowing intrinsics)
- #134678 (Update `ReadDir::next` in `std::sys::pal::unix::fs` to use `&raw const (*p).field` instead of `p.byte_offset().cast()`)
- #135424 (Detect unstable lint docs that dont enable their feature)
- #135520 (Make sure we actually use the right trivial lifetime substs when eagerly monomorphizing drop for ADTs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not consider traits that have unsatisfied const conditions to be conditionally const
This will improve error messages as we continue to constify traits, since we don't want to start calling things "conditionally const" if they aren't implemented with a const impl anyways.
The only case that this affects today is `Deref` since that's one of the only constified traits in the standard library :)
r? RalfJung
Enforce syntactical stability of const traits in HIR
This PR enforces what I'm calling *syntactical* const stability of traits. In other words, it enforces the ability to name `~const`/`const` traits in trait bounds in various syntax positions in HIR (including in the trait of an impl header). This functionality is analogous to the *regular* item stability checker, which is concerned with making sure that you cannot refer to unstable items by name, and is implemented as an extension of that pass.
This is separate from enforcing the *recursive* const stability of const trait methods, which is implemented in MIR and runs on MIR bodies. That will require adding a new `NonConstOp` to the const checker and probably adjusting some logic to deduplicate redundant errors.
However, this check is separate and necessary for making sure that users don't add `~const`/`const` bounds to items when the trait is not const-stable in the first place. I chose to separate enforcing recursive const stability out of this PR to make it easier to review. I'll probably open a follow-up following this one, blocked on this PR.
r? `@RalfJung` cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits`
Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts
I forgot about `ty::ConstKind::Value` in #134771.
The error message here could use some work -- both in the new trait solver and the old trait solver. But unrelated to the issue here.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135361 -- this was only ICEing in coherence because coherence uses the new trait solver, but I don't think the minimization is worth committing compared to the test I added.
r? ```@lcnr``` or ```@BoxyUwU```
Improve `DispatchFromDyn` and `CoerceUnsized` impl validation
* Disallow arbitrary 1-ZST fields in `DispatchFromDyn` -- only `PhantomData`, and 1-ZSTs that mention no params (which is needed to support, e.g., the `Global` alloctor in `Box<T, U = Global>`).
* Don't allow coercing between non-ZSTs to ZSTs (since the previous check wasn't actually checking the field tys were the same before checking the layout...)
* Normalize the field before checking it's `PhantomData`.
Fixes#135215Fixes#135214Fixes#135220
r? ```@BoxyUwU``` or reassign
Make sure to scrape region constraints from deeply normalizing type outlives assumptions in borrowck
Otherwise we're just randomly registering these region relations into the infcx which isn't good
r? lcnr
