The `println!();` statement's span doesn't include the `;`, and the modified suggestions where trying to get the `;` by getting the differenece between the statement's and the expression's spans, which was an empty suggestion.
Fix#133833, fix#133834.
Bail on more errors in dyn ty lowering
If we have more than one principal trait, or if we have a principal trait with errors in it, then bail with `TyKind::Error` rather than attempting lowering. Lowering a dyn trait with more than one principal just arbitrarily chooses the first one and drops the subsequent ones, and lowering a dyn trait path with errors in it is just kinda useless.
This suppresses unnecessary errors which I think is net-good, but also is important to make sure that we don't end up leaking `{type error}` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133388 error messaging :)
r? types
Fix closure arg extraction in `extract_callable_info`, generalize it to async closures
* Fix argument extraction in `extract_callable_info`
* FIx `extract_callable_info` to work for async closures
* Remove redundant `is_fn_ty` which is just a less general `extract_callable_info`
* More precisely name what is being called (i.e. call it a "closure" not a "function")
Review this without whitespace -- I ended up reformatting `extract_callable_info` because some pesky `//` comments were keeping the let-chains from being formatted.
After:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | const PAT: u32 = 0;
| -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
...
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^
| |
| pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
| help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```
Before:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^
| |
| pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
| missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
| help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```
Suggest fixing typos and let bindings at the same time
Fixes#132483
Currently, a suggestion for adding a let binding won't be shown if we suggest fixing a typo. This changes that behavior to always show both, if possible. Essentially, this turns the suggestion from
```rust
error[E0425]: cannot find value `x2` in this scope
--> src/main.rs:4:5
|
4 | x2 = 2;
| ^^ help: a local variable with a similar name exists: `x1`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
```
to
```rust
error[E0425]: cannot find value `x2` in this scope
--> src/main.rs:4:5
|
4 | x2 = 2;
| ^^
|
help: a local variable with a similar name exists
|
4 | x1 = 2;
| ~~
help: you might have meant to introduce a new binding
|
4 | let x2 = 2;
| +++
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
```
for the following code:
```rust
fn main() {
let x1 = 1;
x2 = 2;
}
```
The original behavior only shows the suggestion for a let binding if a typo suggestion wasn't already displayed. However, this falls apart in the cases like the one above where we have multiple similar variables. I don't think it makes sense to hide this suggestion if there's a similar variable, since that defeats the purpose of this suggestion in that case (it's meant to help those coming from languages like Python).
When a trait is not implemented for a type, but there *is* an `impl`
for another type or different trait params, we format the output to
use highlighting in the same way that E0308 does for types.
The logic accounts for 3 cases:
- When both the type and trait in the expected predicate and the candidate are different
- When only the types are different
- When only the trait generic params are different
For each case, we use slightly different formatting and wording.
Remove the "which is required by `{root_obligation}`" post-script in
"the trait `X` is not implemented for `Y`" explanation in E0277. This
information is already conveyed in the notes explaining requirements,
making it redundant while making the text (particularly in labels)
harder to read.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
vs the prior
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`, which is required by `Option<NotCopy>: Copy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
Stop inverting expectation in normalization errors
We have some funky special case logic to invert the expectation and actual type for normalization errors depending on their cause code. IMO most of the error messages get better, except for `try {}` blocks' type expectations. I think that these need to be special cased in some other way, rather than via this hack.
Fixes#131763
On implicit `Sized` bound on fn argument, point at type instead of pattern
Instead of
```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `(dyn ThriftService<(), AssocType = _> + 'static)` cannot be known at compilation time
--> $DIR/issue-59324.rs:23:20
|
LL | fn with_factory<H>(factory: dyn ThriftService<()>) {}
| ^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
```
output
```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `(dyn ThriftService<(), AssocType = _> + 'static)` cannot be known at compilation time
--> $DIR/issue-59324.rs:23:29
|
LL | fn with_factory<H>(factory: dyn ThriftService<()>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
```
Instead of
```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `(dyn ThriftService<(), AssocType = _> + 'static)` cannot be known at compilation time
--> $DIR/issue-59324.rs:23:20
|
LL | fn with_factory<H>(factory: dyn ThriftService<()>) {}
| ^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
```
output
```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `(dyn ThriftService<(), AssocType = _> + 'static)` cannot be known at compilation time
--> $DIR/issue-59324.rs:23:29
|
LL | fn with_factory<H>(factory: dyn ThriftService<()>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
```
This changes the remaining span for the cast, because the new `Cast`
category has a higher priority (lower `Ord`) than the old `Coercion`
category, so we no longer report the region error for the "unsizing"
coercion from `*const Trait` to itself.
Don't call `ty::Const::normalize` in error reporting
We do this to ensure that trait refs with unevaluated consts have those consts simplified to their evaluated forms. Instead, use `try_normalize_erasing_regions`.
**NOTE:** This has the side-effect of erasing regions from all of our trait refs. If this is too much to review or you think it's too opinionated of a diagnostics change, then I could split out the effective change (i.e. erasing regions from this impl suggestion) into another PR and have someone else review it.
Add str.as_str() for easy Deref to string slices
Working with `Box<str>` is cumbersome, because in places like `iter.filter()` it can end up being `&Box<str>` or even `&&Box<str>`, and such type doesn't always get auto-dereferenced as expected.
Dereferencing such box to `&str` requires ugly syntax like `&**boxed_str` or `&***boxed_str`, with the exact amount of `*`s.
`Box<str>` is [not easily comparable with other string types](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129852) via `PartialEq`. `Box<str>` won't work for lookups in types like `HashSet<String>`, because `Borrow<String>` won't take types like `&Box<str>`. OTOH `set.contains(s.as_str())` works nicely regardless of levels of indirection.
`String` has a simple solution for this: the `as_str()` method, and `Box<str>` should too.
Add `NonNull` convenience methods to `Box` and `Vec`
Implements the ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/418.
The docs for the added methods are mostly copied from the existing methods that use raw pointers instead of `NonNull`.
I'm new to this "contributing to rustc" thing, so I'm sorry if I did something wrong. In particular, I don't know what the process is for creating a new unstable feature. Please advise me if I should do something. Thank you.
Suggest the correct pattern syntax on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant
Closes#126243
I add a suggestion on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant.
