detects redundant imports that can be eliminated.
for #117772 :
In order to facilitate review and modification, split the checking code and
removing redundant imports code into two PR.
Re-draft Deref docs
Make general advice more explicit and note the difference between
generic and specific implementations.
Re-draft DerefMut docs in-line with Deref
Fix Deref docs typos
Fix broken links
Clarify advice for specific-over-generic impls
Add comment addressing Issue #73682
x fmt
Copy faillibility warning to DerefMut
This makes it so that all the matchers that match against paths use the
definition path instead of the export path. This removes all duplication
around `std`/`alloc`/`core`.
This is not necessarily optimal because we now depend on internal
implementation details like `core::ops::control_flow::ControlFlow`,
which is not very nice and probably not acceptable for a stable
`on_unimplemented`.
An alternative would be to just string-replace normalize away
`alloc`/`core` to `std` as a special case, keeping the export paths but
making it so that we're still fully standard library flavor agnostic.
To avoid link time dependency between core and compiler-builtins, when
using opt-level that implicitly enables -Zshare-generics.
While compiler-builtins should be compiled with -Zshare-generics
disabled, the -Zbuild-std does not ensure this at the moment.
Change the parameter name of From::from to `value`
The `From` trait is currently defined as:
```rust
pub trait From<T>: Sized {
fn from(_: T) -> Self;
}
```
The name of the argument is `_`. I am proposing to change it to `value`, ie.
```rust
pub trait From<T>: Sized {
fn from(value: T) -> Self;
}
```
This would be more consistent with the `TryFrom`, which looks like this:
```rust
pub trait TryFrom<T>: Sized {
type Error;
fn try_from(value: T) -> Result<Self, Self::Error>;
}
```
The reason for this proposal is twofold:
1. Consistency with the rest of the standard library. The `TryFrom` trait uses `value`, and no `From` implementation uses the default name (as it is quite useless).
2. When generating trait implementations with rust-analyzer/IntelliJ, the parameter name is copied, and it always has to be changed.
Optionally, another name like `x` could be used. I only propose `value` for consistency with `TryFrom`.
Changing parameter names is not a breaking change.
Note: this was originally posted as an internals thread [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/change-the-argument-name-of-from-from/17480)
docs: Improve AsRef / AsMut docs on blanket impls
There are several issues with the current state of `AsRef` and `AsMut` as [discussed here on IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/semantics-of-asref/17016). See also #39397, #45742, #73390, #98905, and the FIXMEs [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.62.0/library/core/src/convert/mod.rs#L509-L515) and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.62.0/library/core/src/convert/mod.rs#L530-L536). These issues are difficult to fix. This PR aims to update the documentation to better reflect the status-quo and to give advice on how `AsRef` and `AsMut` should be used.
In particular:
- Explicitly mention that `AsRef` and `AsMut` do not auto-dereference generally for all dereferencable types (but only if inner type is a shared and/or mutable reference)
- Give advice to not use `AsRef` or `AsMut` for the sole purpose of dereferencing
- Suggest providing a transitive `AsRef` or `AsMut` implementation for types which implement `Deref`
- Add new section "Reflexivity" in documentation comments for `AsRef` and `AsMut`
- Provide better example for `AsMut`
- Added heading "Relation to `Borrow`" in `AsRef`'s docs to improve structure
I noticed in the MIR for <https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=67097e0494363ee27421a4e3bdfaf513> that it's inlined most stuff
```
scope 5 (inlined <Result<i32, u32> as Try>::branch)
```
```
scope 8 (inlined <Result<i32, u32> as Try>::from_output)
```
But yet the do-nothing `from` call was still there:
```
_17 = <u32 as From<u32>>::from(move _18) -> bb9;
```
So let's give this a try and see what perf has to say.
Changed wording in sections on "Reflexivity":
replaced "that is there is" with "i.e. there would be" and removed comma
before "with"
Reason: "there is" somewhat contradicted the "would be" hypothetical.
A slightly redundant wording has now been chosen for better clarity.
The comma seemed to be superfluous.
