Allow parenthesis around inferred array lengths
In #135272 it was noticed that we weren't handling `Vec<(((((_)))))>` correctly under the new desugaring for `generic_arg_infer`, this had to be fixed in order to not regress stable code for types that should continue working. This has the side effect of *also* allowing the following to work:
```rust
#![feature(generic_arg_infer)]
struct Bar<const N: usize>;
fn main() {
let a: Bar<((_))> = Bar::<10>;
}
```
However I did not make the same change for array lengths resulting in the following not compiling:
```rust
#![feature(generic_arg_infer)]
fn main() {
let a: [u8; (((_)))] = [2; 2];
let a: [u8; 2] = [2; (((((_)))))];
}
```
This is rather inconsistent as parenthesis around `_` *are* supported for const args to non-arrays, and type args. This PR fixes this allowing the above example to compile. No stable impact.
r? compiler-errors
Deeply normalize obligations in `BestObligation` folder
Built on #139513.
This establishes a somewhat rough invariant that the `Obligation`'s predicate is always deeply normalized in the folder; when we construct a new obligation we normalize it.
Putting this up for discussion since it does affect some goals.
r? lcnr
Allow drivers to supply a list of extra symbols to intern
Allows adding new symbols as `const`s in external drivers, desirable in Clippy so we can use them in patterns to replace code like 75530e9f72/src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/casts/cast_ptr_alignment.rs (L66)
The Clippy change adds a couple symbols as a demo, the exact `clippy_utils` API and replacing other usages can be done on the Clippy side to minimise sync conflicts
---
try-job: aarch64-gnu
add `core::intrinsics::simd::{simd_extract_dyn, simd_insert_dyn}`
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137372
adds `core::intrinsics::simd::{simd_extract_dyn, simd_insert_dyn}`, which contrary to their non-dyn counterparts allow a non-const index. Many platforms (but notably not x86_64 or aarch64) have dedicated instructions for this operation, which stdarch can emit with this change.
Future work is to also make the `Index` operation on the `Simd` type emit this operation, but the intrinsic can't be used directly. We'll need some MIR shenanigans for that.
r? `@ghost`
Reuse the index from promoted nodes when coloring executed tasks
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138824 did not correctly handle the case where a dep node was promoted green, but later or concurrently executed. It resulted in multiple dep nodes being allocated to it. This fixes that by checking that the node was not previously green in the encoder lock.
This also fixes a race when forcing diagnostic nodes introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138824.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138824 should get reverted on beta.
This should fix#139110.
r? `@oli-obk`
Rename some `name` variables as `ident`.
It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called `ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.
This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of `Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
r? `@fee1-dead`
fix "still mutable" ice while metrics are enabled
Resolves "still mutable" ICE discovered by `@matthiaskrgr` here: [#t-docs-rs > metrics intitiative @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/356853-t-docs-rs/topic/metrics.20intitiative/near/510490790)
This was caused by invoking `crate_hash` before the `definitions` struct was frozen here: e643f59f6d/compiler/rustc_interface/src/passes.rs (L951)
resolved by moving metrics dumping to occur after `analysis` freezes the definitions
I'm guessing we didn't discover this in CI because the problem only occurs when you try to calculate the crash hash with incremental compilation enabled when it tries to freeze the definitions here: e643f59f6d/compiler/rustc_middle/src/hir/map.rs (L1172)
my understanding is that this causes us to freeze the definitions too early in compilation, then we subsequently try to mutate them, likely during `analysis`, and this causes the ICE.
r? `@bjorn3`
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138167 (Small code improvement in rustdoc hidden stripper)
- #138605 (Clean up librustdoc::html::render to be better encapsulated)
- #139423 (Suppress missing field error when autoderef bottoms out in infer)
- #139449 (match ergonomics: replace `peel_off_references` with a recursive call)
- #139507 (compiletest: Trim whitespace from environment variable names)
- #139530 (Remove some dead or leftover code related to rustc-intrinsic abi removal)
- #139560 (fix title of offset_of_enum feature)
- #139563 (emit a better error message for using the macro incorrectly)
- #139568 (Don't use empty trait names)
- #139580 (Temporarily leave the review rotation)
- #139589 (saethlin is back from vacation)
- #139592 (rustdoc: Enable Markdown extensions when looking for doctests)
- #139599 (Tracking issue template: fine-grained information on style update status)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
emit a better error message for using the macro incorrectly
fixing: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rust/issues/185
I feel like it's not a perfect message either, so I'm open to suggestions.
But at the end of the day users will need to read the docs anyway, and emitting
multi-line errors each time this gets triggered can probably become annoying?
r? ``@jieyouxu`` since you've reviewed my frontend work back in the days.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
match ergonomics: replace `peel_off_references` with a recursive call
This makes it imo quite a bit easier to follow how the binding mode gets calculated.
cc ```@dianne```
Suppress missing field error when autoderef bottoms out in infer
I see this error repeatedly when doing refactorings, and it's pretty misleading b/c it's not the source of the error.
Rigidly project missing item due to guaranteed impossible sized predicate
This is a somewhat involved change, but it amounts to treating missing impl items due to guaranteed impossible where clauses (dyn/str/slice sized, cc #135480) as *rigid projections* rather than projecting to an error term, since that was preventing either reporting a proper error (in an empty param env) *or* successfully type checking the code (in the presence of trivially false where clauses).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138970
r? `@lcnr` `@oli-obk`
It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to
silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called
`ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.
This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of
`Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
report call site of inlined scopes for large assignment lints
Addressed issue: #121672
Tracking issue: #83518
r? `@oli-obk`
I tried to follow your comment about what to do [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121672#issuecomment-1972783675). However, I'm totally unfamiliar with the code so far (this is my first contribution touching compiler code), so I apologize in advance if I did something stupid 😅
In particular, I'm not sure I use the _correct_ source scope to look for inline data, as there is a whole `IndexVec` of them. My changes definitely did something, as can be seen by the added ui test. However, the result is not as anticipated in the issue:
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ value moved from here
```
instead of
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^ value moved from here
```
raising my suspicion that maybe I got the wrong source scope.
Report higher-ranked trait error when higher-ranked projection goal fails in new solver
~~See HACK comment inline. Not actually sure if it should be marked as a *HACK*, b/c~~ it's kinda a legitimate case we want to care about unless we're going to make the proof tree visitor *smarter* about the leak check than the actual trait solver itself.
Encountered this while battling with `NiceRegionError`s in the old solver b/c I wondered what this code ended up giving us in the *new* solver as a comparison:
```rust
trait Foo {}
impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
fn main() {
baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
}
```
On master it's pretty bad:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<fn(&()) as FnOnce<(&(),)>>::Output == ()`
--> <source>:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ types differ
|
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> <source>:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```
After this PR it's much better:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `fn(&'static ()): Foo` is not satisfied
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `for<'a> FnOnce(&'a ())` is not implemented for `fn(&'static ())`
|
= note: expected a closure with arguments `(&'static (),)`
found a closure with arguments `(&(),)`
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
note: required by a bound in `baz`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:5:11
|
5 | fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
| ^^^ required by this bound in `baz`
```
r? lcnr
Don't call `Span::with_parent` on the good path in `has_stashed_diagnostic`
More unnecessary incurred span tracking avoided by not calling `span.with_parent(None)`. This is useless on its own but makes it much easier to fix other "span tracking on the good path" issues in the future.
r? oli-obk
Make the compiler suggest actual paths instead of visible paths if the visible paths are through any doc hidden path.
close#127011
Currently, when emitting a diagnostic about a valid trait, the compiler suggestes using visible paths of the trait even if they are through a doc hidden path. This PR updates the compiler to suggest actual paths in these cases.
Allow GVN to produce places and not just locals.
That may be too big of a hammer, as we may introduce new deref projections (possible UB footgun + probably not good for perf).
The second commit opts out of introducing projections that don't have a stable offset, which is probably what we want. Hence no new Deref and no new Index projections.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138936
cc `@scottmcm` `@dianqk`
Currently in case of a Trait object in closure parameter, the compiler
suggests either to use a reference, which is correct or to use an
`impl Trait` which is not. Do not emit this suggestion when the parameter
is part of a closure.
`resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope` checks for an empty name. Why is this
necessary? Because `parse_item_impl` can produce an `impl` block with an
empty trait name in some cases. This is pretty gross and very
non-obvious.
This commit avoids the use of the empty trait name. In one case the
trait name is instead pulled from `TyKind::ImplTrait`, which prevents
the output for `tests/ui/impl-trait/extra-impl-in-trait-impl.rs` from
changing. In the other case we just fail the parse and don't try to
recover. I think losing error recovery in this obscure case is worth
the code cleanup.
This change affects `tests/ui/parser/impl-parsing.rs`, which is split in
two, and the obsolete `..` syntax cases are removed (they are tested
elsewhere).
