Remove drop order twist of && and || and make them associative
Previously a short circuiting binop chain (chain of && or ||s) would drop the temporaries created by the first element after all the other elements, and otherwise follow evaluation order. So `f(1).g() && f(2).g() && f(3).g() && f(4).g()` would drop the temporaries in the order `2,3,4,1`. This made `&&` and `||` non-associative regarding drop order. In other words, adding ()'s to the expression would change drop order: `f(1).g() && (f(2).g() && f(3).g()) && f(4).g()` for example would drop in the order `3,2,4,1`.
As, except for the bool result, there is no data returned by the sub-expressions of the short circuiting binops, we can safely discard of any temporaries created by the sub-expr. Previously, code was already putting the rhs's into terminating scopes, but missed it for the lhs's.
This commit addresses this "twist". We now also put the lhs into a terminating scope. The drop order of the above expressions becomes `1,2,3,4`.
There might be code relying on the current order, and therefore I'd recommend doing a crater run to gauge the impact. I'd argue that such code is already quite wonky as it is one `foo() &&` addition away from breaking. ~~For the impact, I don't expect any *build* failures, as the compiler gets strictly more tolerant: shortening the lifetime of temporaries only expands the list of programs the compiler accepts as valid. There might be *runtime* failures caused by this change however.~~ Edit: both build and runtime failures are possible, e.g. see the example provided by dtolnay [below](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103293#issuecomment-1285341113). Edit2: the crater run has finished and [results](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103293#issuecomment-1292275203) are that there is only one build failure which is easy to fix with a +/- 1 line diff.
I've included a testcase that now compiles thanks to this patch.
The breakage is also limited to drop order relative to conditionals in the && chain: that is, in code like this:
```Rust
let hello = foo().hi() && bar().world();
println!("hi");
```
we already drop the temporaries of `foo().hi()` before we reach "hi".
I'd ideally have this PR merged before let chains are stabilized. If this PR is taking too long, I'd love to have a more restricted version of this change limited to `&&`'s in let chains: the `&&`'s of such chains are quite special anyways as they accept `let` bindings, in there the `&&` is therefore more a part of the "if let chain" construct than a construct of its own.
Fixes#103107
Status: waiting on [this accepted FCP](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103293#issuecomment-1293411354) finishing.
Fix passing MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to the linker
I messed up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103929 when merging the two base files together and as a result, started ignoring `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` at the linker level. This ended up being the cause of nighty builds not running on older macOS versions.
My original hope with the previous PR was that CI would have caught something like that but there were only tests checking the compiler target definitions in codegen tests. Because of how badly this sucks to break, I put together a new test via `run-make` that actually confirms the deployment target set makes it to the linker instead of just LLVM.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104570 (for real this time)
This avoids creation of a terminating scope in
chains that contain both && and ||, because
also there we know that a terminating scope is
not neccessary: all the chain members are already
in such terminating scopes.
Also add a mixed && / || test.
Previously a short circuiting && chain would drop the
first element after all the other elements, and otherwise
follow evaluation order, so code like:
f(1).g() && f(2).g() && f(3).g() && f(4).g()
would drop the temporaries in the order 2,3,4,1. This made
&& and || non-associative regarding drop order, so
adding ()'s to the expression would change drop order:
f(1).g() && (f(2).g() && f(3).g()) && f(4).g()
for example would drop in the order 3,2,4,1.
As, except for the bool result, there is no data returned
by the sub-expressions of the short circuiting binops,
we can safely discard of any temporaries created by the
sub-expr. Previously, code was already putting the rhs's
into terminating scopes, but missed it for the lhs's.
This commit addresses this "twist". In the expression,
we now also put the lhs into a terminating scope.
The drop order for the above expressions is 1,2,3,4
now.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104199 (Keep track of the start of the argument block of a closure)
- #105050 (Remove useless borrows and derefs)
- #105153 (Create a hacky fail-fast mode that stops tests at the first failure)
- #105164 (Restore `use` suggestion for `dyn` method call requiring `Sized`)
- #105193 (Disable coverage instrumentation for naked functions)
- #105200 (Remove useless filter in unused extern crate check.)
- #105201 (Do not call fn_sig on non-functions.)
- #105208 (Add AmbiguityError for inconsistent resolution for an import)
- #105214 (update Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Restore `use` suggestion for `dyn` method call requiring `Sized`
Add the suggestion back that I accidentally removed in 88f2140d87 because I didn't understand that suggestion was actually useful...
Fixes#105159
Remove useless borrows and derefs
They are nothing more than noise.
<sub>These are not all of them, but my clippy started crashing (stack overflow), so rip :(</sub>
Don't elide type information when printing E0308 with `-Zverbose`
When we pass `-Zverbose`, we kinda expect for all `_` to be replaced with more descriptive information, for example --
```
= note: expected fn pointer `fn(_, u32)`
found fn item `fn(_, i32) {foo}`
```
Where `_` is the "identical" part of the fn signatures, now gets rendered as:
```
= note: expected fn pointer `fn(i32, u32)`
found fn item `fn(i32, i32) {foo}`
```
Check lifetime param count in `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys`
We checked the type and const generics count, but not the lifetimes, which were handled in a different function.
Fixes#105154
Add `type_ascribe!` macro as placeholder syntax for type ascription
This makes it still possible to test the internal semantics of type ascription even once the `:`-syntax is removed from the parser. The macro now gets used in a bunch of UI tests that test the semantics and not syntax of type ascription.
I might have forgotten a few tests but this should hopefully be most of them. The remaining ones will certainly be found once type ascription is removed from the parser altogether.
Part of #101728
rustc_ast_lowering: Stop lowering imports into multiple items
Lower them into a single item with multiple resolutions instead.
This also allows to remove additional `NodId`s and `DefId`s related to those additional items.
This avoids calling `early_lint_node` twice.
Note: one `early_lint_node` call had `!pre_expansion` for the second
argument and the other had `false`. The new single call just has
`!pre_expansion`. This results in a reduction of duplicate error
messages in some `ui-fulldeps` tests. The order of some `ui-fulldeps`
output also changes, but that doesn't matter.
