add some more testcases
resolves#52893resolves#68295resolves#87750resolves#88071
All these issues have been fixed according to glacier. Just adding a test so it can be closed.
Can anybody tell me why the github keywords do not work? 🤔
Please edit this post if you can fix it.
Stabilize `const_panic`
Closes#51999
FCP completed in #89006
```@rustbot``` label +A-const-eval +A-const-fn +T-lang
cc ```@oli-obk``` for review (not `r?`'ing as not on lang team)
Constify ?-operator for Result and Option
Try to make `?`-operator usable in `const fn` with `Result` and `Option`, see #74935 . Note that the try-operator itself was constified in #87237.
TODO
* [x] Add tests for const T -> T conversions
* [x] cleanup commits
* [x] Remove `#![allow(incomplete_features)]`
* [?] Await decision in #86808 - I'm not sure
* [x] Await support for parsing `~const` in bootstrapping compiler
* [x] Tracking issue(s)? - #88674
Use larger span for adjustment THIR expressions
Currently, we use a relatively 'small' span for THIR
expressions generated by an 'adjustment' (e.g. an autoderef,
autoborrow, unsizing). As a result, if a borrow generated
by an adustment ends up causing a borrowcheck error, for example:
```rust
let mut my_var = String::new();
let my_ref = &my_var
my_var.push('a');
my_ref;
```
then the span for the mutable borrow may end up referring
to only the base expression (e.g. `my_var`), rather than
the method call which triggered the mutable borrow
(e.g. `my_var.push('a')`)
Due to a quirk of the MIR borrowck implementation,
this doesn't always get exposed in migration mode,
but it does in many cases.
This commit makes THIR building consistently use 'larger'
spans for adjustment expressions. These spans are recoded
when we first create the adjustment during typecheck. For
example, an autoref adjustment triggered by a method call
will record the span of the entire method call.
The intent of this change it make it clearer to users
when it's the specific way in which a variable is
used (for example, in a method call) that produdes
a borrowcheck error. For example, an error message
claiming that a 'mutable borrow occurs here' might
be confusing if it just points at a usage of a variable
(e.g. `my_var`), when no `&mut` is in sight. Pointing
at the entire expression should help to emphasize
that the method call itself is responsible for
the mutable borrow.
In several cases, this makes the `#![feature(nll)]` diagnostic
output match up exactly with the default (migration mode) output.
As a result, several `.nll.stderr` files end up getting removed
entirely.
Add an intermediate representation to exhaustiveness checking
The exhaustiveness checking algorithm keeps deconstructing patterns into a `Constructor` and some `Fields`, but does so a bit all over the place. This PR introduces a new representation for patterns that already has that information, so we only compute it once at the start.
I find this makes code easier to follow. In particular `DeconstructedPat::specialize` is a lot simpler than what happened before, and more closely matches the description of the algorithm. I'm also hoping this could help for the project of librarifying exhaustiveness for rust_analyzer since it decouples the algorithm from `rustc_middle::Pat`.
Currently, we use a relatively 'small' span for THIR
expressions generated by an 'adjustment' (e.g. an autoderef,
autoborrow, unsizing). As a result, if a borrow generated
by an adustment ends up causing a borrowcheck error, for example:
```rust
let mut my_var = String::new();
let my_ref = &my_var
my_var.push('a');
my_ref;
```
then the span for the mutable borrow may end up referring
to only the base expression (e.g. `my_var`), rather than
the method call which triggered the mutable borrow
(e.g. `my_var.push('a')`)
Due to a quirk of the MIR borrowck implementation,
this doesn't always get exposed in migration mode,
but it does in many cases.
This commit makes THIR building consistently use 'larger'
spans for adjustment expressions
The intent of this change it make it clearer to users
when it's the specific way in which a variable is
used (for example, in a method call) that produdes
a borrowcheck error. For example, an error message
claiming that a 'mutable borrow occurs here' might
be confusing if it just points at a usage of a variable
(e.g. `my_var`), when no `&mut` is in sight. Pointing
at the entire expression should help to emphasize
that the method call itself is responsible for
the mutable borrow.
In several cases, this makes the `#![feature(nll)]` diagnostic
output match up exactly with the default (migration mode) output.
As a result, several `.nll.stderr` files end up getting removed
entirely.
Add a separate error for `dyn Trait` in `const fn`
Previously "trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable" error was used for both trait bounds (`<T: Trait>`) and trait objects (`dyn Trait`). This was pretty confusing.
This PR adds a separate error for trait objects: "trait objects in const fn are unstable". The error for trait bounds is otherwise intact.
This is follow up to #88907
r? ``@estebank``
``@rustbot`` label: +A-diagnostics
Allow `panic!("{}", computed_str)` in const fn.
Special-case `panic!("{}", arg)` and translate it to `panic_display(&arg)`. `panic_display` will behave like `panic_any` in cosnt eval and behave like `panic!(format_args!("{}", arg))` in runtime.
This should bring Rust 2015 and 2021 to feature parity in terms of `const_panic`; and hopefully would unblock the stabilisation of #51999.
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-compiler +T-libs +A-const-eval +A-const-fn
r? `@oli-obk`
Previously "trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable"
error was used for both trait bounds (<T: Trait>) and trait objects (dyn Trait).
This was pretty confusing.
This patch adds a separeta error for trait objects: "trait objects in const fn
are unstable". The error for trait bounds is otherwise intact.
Currently, for the following code, the compiler produces the errors like the
following error:
```rust
struct Type<T>
impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
fn const f() {}
}
```
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
This can be confusing (especially to newcomers) since the error mentions
"const fn parameters", but highlights only the impl.
This commits adds function highlighting, changing the error to the following:
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
4 | pub const fn f() {}
| ---------------- function declared as const here
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
Fix drop handling for `if let` expressions
MIR lowering for `if let` expressions is now more complicated now that
`if let` exists in HIR. This PR adds a scope for the variables bound in
an `if let` expression and then uses an approach similar to how we
handle loops to ensure that we reliably drop the correct variables.
Closes#88307
cc `@flip1995` `@richkadel` `@c410-f3r`
MIR lowering for `if let` expressions is now more complicated now that
`if let` exists in HIR. This PR adds a scope for the variables bound in
an `if let` expression and then uses an approach similar to how we
handle loops to ensure that we reliably drop the correct variables.
- [x] Removed `?const` and change uses of `?const`
- [x] Added `~const` to the AST. It is gated behind const_trait_impl.
- [x] Validate `~const` in ast_validation.
- [ ] Add enum `BoundConstness` to the HIR. (With variants `NotConst` and
`ConstIfConst` allowing future extensions)
- [ ] Adjust trait selection and pre-existing code to use `BoundConstness`.
- [ ] Optional steps (*for this PR, obviously*)
- [ ] Fix#88155
- [ ] Do something with constness bounds in chalk
Fix debugger stepping behavior with `match` expressions
Previously, we would set up the source lines for `match` expressions so
that the code generated to perform the test of the scrutinee was matched
to the line of the arm that required the test and then jump from the arm
block to the "next" block was matched to all of the lines in the `match`
expression.
While that makes sense, it has the side effect of causing strange
stepping behavior in debuggers.
I've changed the source information so that all of the generated tests
are sourced to `match {scrutinee}` and the jumps are sourced to the last
line of the block they are inside. This resolves the weird stepping
behavior in all debuggers and resolves some instances of "ambiguous
symbol" errors in WinDbg preventing the user from setting breakpoints at
`match` expressions.
Before:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/831192/128577421-ee0c9c03-da28-4d16-997a-d57988a7bb7f.mp4
After:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/831192/128577433-2ceab04d-953e-4e31-9387-93f049c71ff3.mp4Fixes#87817
Previously, we would set up the source lines for `match` expressions so
that the code generated to perform the test of the scrutinee was matched
to the line of the arm that required the test and then jump from the arm
block to the "next" block was matched to all of the lines in the `match`
expression.
While that makes sense, it has the side effect of causing strange
stepping behavior in debuggers.
I've changed the source information so that all of the generated tests
are sourced to `match {scrutinee}` and the jumps are sourced to the last
line of the block they are inside. This resolves the weird stepping
behavior in all debuggers and resolves some instances of "ambiguous
symbol" errors in WinDbg preventing the user from setting breakpoints at
`match` expressions.
Try filtering out non-const impls when we expect const impls
**TL;DR**: Associated types on const impls are now bounded; we now disallow calling a const function with bounds when the specified type param only has a non-const impl.
r? `@oli-obk`
Move some UI tests to more suitable subdirs
The classifui result: https://gist.github.com/JohnTitor/c9e00840990b5e4a8fc562ec3571e427/e06c42226c6038da91e403c33b9947843420cf44
Some notes:
- backtrace-debuginfo.rs: previously I skipped this, I'm still not sure what the best dir is. Any ideas?
- estr-subtyping.rs: Seems a quite old test so removed, shouldn't?
- deref-suggestion.rs: moved to inference as `suggestions` is not an ideal dir.
- issue-43023.rs: a bit misclassified, moved to `derives`
cc #73494
r? `@petrochenkov`
* On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format
* When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline
* Color highlight modified span
