2229: Consume IfLet expr
When using the IfLet guard feature, we can ICE when attempting to resolve PlaceBuilders.
For pattern matching, we currently don't consume the IfLet expression when "visiting" the arms leading us to not "read" all variables and hence not being able to resolve them.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88118
Re-write shadow lints
changelog: Move shadow_unrelated to restriction
changelog: The shadow lints find a lot more shadows and are not limited to certain patterns
Drastically simplifies the implementation. Catches a lot more cases.
I removed the "initialization happens here" note. It is not helpful IMO.
Closes#318Fixes#2890Fixes#6563Fixes#7588Fixes#7620
Previously this query depended on the global interning order of Symbols, which
meant that irrelevant changes could influence the query and cause
recompilations. This commit ensures that the return set is stable and will not
be affected by the global order by deterministically (in lexicographic order)
choosing a name to use if there are multiple names for a single DefId.
Avoid spurious "previous iteration of loop" errors
Only follow backwards edges during `get_moved_indexes` if the move path is definitely initialized at loop entry. Otherwise, the error occurred prior to the loop, so we ignore the backwards edges to avoid generating misleading "value moved here, in previous iteration of loop" errors.
This patch also slightly improves the analysis of inits, including `NonPanicPathOnly` initializations (which are ignored by `drop_flag_effects::for_location_inits`). This is required for the definite initialization analysis, but may also help find certain skipped reinits in rare cases.
Patch passes all non-ignored src/test/ui testcases.
Fixes#72649.
fix bug for large_enum_variants
Fix the discussion problem in the issue of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/7666#issuecomment-919654291
About the false positive problem of case:
```rust
enum LargeEnum6 {
A,
B([u8;255]),
C([u8;200]),
}
```
changelog: Fix largest_enum_variant wrongly identifying the second largest variant.
Constify ?-operator for Result and Option
Try to make `?`-operator usable in `const fn` with `Result` and `Option`, see #74935 . Note that the try-operator itself was constified in #87237.
TODO
* [x] Add tests for const T -> T conversions
* [x] cleanup commits
* [x] Remove `#![allow(incomplete_features)]`
* [?] Await decision in #86808 - I'm not sure
* [x] Await support for parsing `~const` in bootstrapping compiler
* [x] Tracking issue(s)? - #88674
Don't anonymize bound region names during typeck
Once this anonymization has performed, we have no
way of recovering the original names during NLL
borrow checking. Keeping the original names allows
error messages in full NLL mode to contain the original
bound region names.
As a result, the typeck results may contain types that
differ only in the names used for their bound regions. However,
anonimization of bound regions does not guarantee that
all distinct types are unqual (e.g. not subtypes of each other).
For example, `for<'a> fn(&'a u32, &'a u32)` and
`for<'b, 'c> fn(&'b u32, &'c u32)` are subtypes of each other,
as explained here:
63cc2bb3d0/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/nll_relate/mod.rs (L682-L690)
Therefore, any code handling types with higher-ranked regions already
needs to handle the case where two distinct `Ty`s are 'actually'
equal.
Update cargo
5 commits in 0121d66aa2ef5ffa9735f86c2b56f5fdc5a837a6..d56b42c549dbb7e7d0f712c51b39400260d114d4
2021-09-22 16:08:27 +0000 to 2021-09-27 13:44:18 +0000
- Allow `cargo update --precise` with metadata. (rust-lang/cargo#9945)
- Support path_in_vcs as part of cargo_vcs_metadata (rust-lang/cargo#9866)
- Doc about InstallTracker files and `install.root` (rust-lang/cargo#9948)
- Add some clarity on the license/license-file warning. (rust-lang/cargo#9941)
- Fix the problem that help cannot be displayed properly (rust-lang/cargo#9933)
rustdoc: Remove lazy_static dependency
The macro was used in only one place and there are equivalents in the std, so it seemed weird to keep it around...
I think running a perf check would be a good idea though, just in case.
r? ``@jyn514``
