prevent opaque types from appearing in impl headers
cc `@lqd`
opaque types are not distinguishable from their hidden type at the codegen stage. So we could either end up with cases where the hidden type doesn't implement the trait (which will thus ICE) or where the hidden type does implement the trait (so we'd be using its impl instead of the one written for the opaque type). This can even lead to unsound behaviour without unsafe code.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86411.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84660.
rebase of #87382 plus some diagnostic tweaks
Fix suggestions in case of `T:` bounds
This PR fixes a corner case in `suggest_constraining_type_params` that was causing incorrect suggestions.
For the following functions:
```rust
fn a<T:>(t: T) { [t, t]; }
fn b<T>(t: T) where T: { [t, t]; }
```
We previously suggested the following:
```text
...
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
1 | fn a<T: Copy:>(t: T) { [t, t]; }
| ++++++
...
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
2 | fn b<T>(t: T) where T: + Copy { [t, t]; }
| ++++++
```
Note that neither `T: Copy:` not `where T: + Copy` is a correct bound.
With this commit the suggestions are correct:
```text
...
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
1 | fn a<T: Copy>(t: T) { [t, t]; }
| ++++
...
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
2 | fn b<T>(t: T) where T: Copy { [t, t]; }
| ++++
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
I've tried fixing #95898 here too, but got too confused with how `suggest_traits_to_import` works and what it does 😅
use `Span::find_ancestor_inside` to get right span in CastCheck
This is a quick fix. This bad suggestion likely lives in other places... but thought it would be useful to fix all of the CastCheck ones first.
Let me know if reviewer would prefer I add more tests for each of the diagnostics in CastCheck, or would like to do a more thorough review of other suggestions that use spans in typeck. I would also be open to further suggestions on how to better expose an API that gives us the "best" span for a diagnostic suggestion.
Fixed#95919
Fix crate_type attribute to not warn on duplicates
In #88681 I accidentally marked the `crate_type` attribute as only allowing a single attribute. However, multiple attributes are allowed (they are joined together [here](027a232755/compiler/rustc_interface/src/util.rs (L530-L542))). This fixes it to not report a warning if duplicates are found.
Closes#95902
[`let_chains`] Forbid `let` inside parentheses
Parenthesizes are mostly a no-op in let chains, in other words, they are mostly ignored.
```rust
let opt = Some(Some(1i32));
if (let Some(a) = opt && (let Some(b) = a)) && b == 1 {
println!("`b` is declared inside but used outside");
}
```
As seen above, such behavior can lead to confusion.
A proper fix or nested encapsulation would probably require research, time and a modified MIR graph so in this PR I simply denied any `let` inside parentheses. Non-let stuff are still allowed.
```rust
fn main() {
let fun = || true;
if let true = (true && fun()) && (true) {
println!("Allowed");
}
}
```
It is worth noting that `let ...` is not an expression and the RFC did not mention this specific situation.
cc `@matthewjasper`
Only suggest removing semicolon when expression is compatible with `impl Trait`
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54771#issuecomment-476423690
> It still needs checking that the last statement's expr can actually conform to the trait, but the naïve behavior is there.
Only suggest removing a semicolon when the type behind the semicolon actually implements the trait in an RPIT `-> impl Trait`. Also upgrade the label that suggests removing the semicolon to a suggestion (should it be verbose?).
cc #54771
Better error for `for<...>` on associated type bound
With GATs just around the corner, we'll probably see more people trying out `Trait<for<'a> Assoc<'a> = ..>`.
This PR improves the syntax error slightly, and also makes it slightly easier to make this into real syntax in the future.
Feel free to push back if the reviewer thinks this should have a suggestion on how to fix it (i.e. push the `for<'a>` outside of the angle brackets), but that can also be handled in a follow-up PR.
`s/compiler-flags/compile-flags` in compiletest
Also make compiletest panic so this doesn't happen in the future! I literally always forget which it's called, so I wanted to make my life easier in the future.
Also open to the possibility of parsing both.
Suggest replacing `typeof(...)` with an actual type
This PR adds suggestion to replace `typeof(...)` with an actual type of `...`, for example in case of `typeof(1)` we suggest replacing it with `i32`.
If the expression
1. Is not const (`{ let a = 1; let _: typeof(a); }`)
2. Can't be found (`let _: typeof(this_variable_does_not_exist)`)
3. Or has non-suggestable type (closure, generator, error, etc)
we don't suggest anything.
The 1 one is sad, but it's not clear how to support non-consts expressions for `typeof`.
_This PR is inspired by [this tweet]._
[this tweet]: https://twitter.com/compiler_errors/status/1511945354752638976
Make def names and HIR names consistent.
The name in the `DefKey` is interned to create the `DefId`, so it does not
require any query to access. This can be leveraged to avoid a few useless
HIR accesses for names.
~In order to achieve that, generic parameters created from universal
impl-trait are given the pretty-printed ast as a name, instead of
`{{opaque}}`.~
~Drive-by: the `TyCtxt::opt_item_name` used a dummy span for non-local
definitions. We have access to `def_ident_span`, so we use it.~
expand: Remove `ParseSess::missing_fragment_specifiers`
It was used for deduplicating some errors for legacy code which are mostly deduplicated even without that, but at cost of global mutable state, which is not a good tradeoff.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95747#issuecomment-1091619403
r? ``@nnethercote``
Make non-power-of-two alignments a validity error in `Layout`
Inspired by the zulip conversation about how `Layout` should better enforce `size <= isize::MAX as usize`, this uses an N-variant enum on N-bit platforms to require at the validity level that the existing invariant of "must be a power of two" is upheld.
This was MIRI can catch it, and means there's a more-specific type for `Layout` to store than just `NonZeroUsize`.
It's left as `pub(crate)` here; a future PR could consider giving it a tracking issue for non-internal usage.
It was used for deduplicating some errors for legacy code which are mostly deduplicated even without that, but at cost of global mutable state, which is not a good tradeoff.
[macro_metavar_expr] Add tests to ensure the feature requirement
These tests should have been added in the initial implementation they were unintentionally forgotten
cc #83527
r? ````@petrochenkov````
Strict provenance lints
See #95488.
This PR introduces two unstable (allow by default) lints to which lint on int2ptr and ptr2int casts, as the former is not possible in the strict provenance model and the latter can be written nicer using the `.addr()` API.
Based on an initial version of the lint by ```@Gankra``` in #95199.
assert_uninit_valid: ensure we detect at least arrays of uninhabited types
We can't easily extend this check to *all* arrays (Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87041), but it turns out the existing check already catches arrays of uninhabited types. So let's make sure it stays that way by adding them to the test.
Inspired by the zulip conversation about how `Layout` should better enforce `size < isize::MAX as usize`, this uses an N-variant enum on N-bit platforms to require at the validity level that the existing invariant of "must be a power of two" is upheld.
This was MIRI can catch it, and means there's a more-specific type for `Layout` to store than just `NonZeroUsize`.
Enforce well formedness for type alias impl trait's hidden type
fixes#84657
This was not an issue with return-position-impl-trait because the generic bounds of the function are the same as those of the opaque type, and the hidden type must already be well formed within the function.
With type-alias-impl-trait the hidden type could be defined in a function that has *more* lifetime bounds than the type alias. This is fine, but the hidden type must still be well formed without those additional bounds.
