Implementation of `fmt::FormattingOptions`
Tracking issue: #118117
Public API:
```rust
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct FormattingOptions { … }
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum Sign {
Plus,
Minus
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum DebugAsHex {
Lower,
Upper
}
impl FormattingOptions {
pub fn new() -> Self;
pub fn sign(&mut self, sign: Option<Sign>) -> &mut Self;
pub fn sign_aware_zero_pad(&mut self, sign_aware_zero_pad: bool) -> &mut Self;
pub fn alternate(&mut self, alternate: bool) -> &mut Self;
pub fn fill(&mut self, fill: char) -> &mut Self;
pub fn align(&mut self, alignment: Option<Alignment>) -> &mut Self;
pub fn width(&mut self, width: Option<usize>) -> &mut Self;
pub fn precision(&mut self, precision: Option<usize>) -> &mut Self;
pub fn debug_as_hex(&mut self, debug_as_hex: Option<DebugAsHex>) -> &mut Self;
pub fn get_sign(&self) -> Option<Sign>;
pub fn get_sign_aware_zero_pad(&self) -> bool;
pub fn get_alternate(&self) -> bool;
pub fn get_fill(&self) -> char;
pub fn get_align(&self) -> Option<Alignment>;
pub fn get_width(&self) -> Option<usize>;
pub fn get_precision(&self) -> Option<usize>;
pub fn get_debug_as_hex(&self) -> Option<DebugAsHex>;
pub fn create_formatter<'a>(self, write: &'a mut (dyn Write + 'a)) -> Formatter<'a>;
}
impl<'a> Formatter<'a> {
pub fn new(write: &'a mut (dyn Write + 'a), options: FormattingOptions) -> Self;
pub fn with_options<'b>(&'b mut self, options: FormattingOptions) -> Formatter<'b>;
pub fn sign(&self) -> Option<Sign>;
pub fn options(&self) -> FormattingOptions;
}
```
Relevant changes from the public API in the tracking issue (I'm leaving out some stuff I consider obvious mistakes, like missing `#[derive(..)]`s and `pub` specifiers):
- `enum DebugAsHex`/`FormattingOptions::debug_as_hex`/`FormattingOptions::get_debug_as_hex`: To support `{:x?}` as well as `{:X?}`. I had completely missed these options in the ACP. I'm open for any and all bikeshedding, not married to the name.
- `fill`/`get_fill` now takes/returns `char` instead of `Option<char>`. This simply mirrors what `Formatter::fill` returns (with default being `' '`).
- Changed `zero_pad`/`get_zero_pad` to `sign_aware_zero_pad`/`get_sign_aware_zero_pad`. This also mirrors `Formatter::sign_aware_zero_pad`. While I'm not a fan of this quite verbose name, I do believe that having the interface of `Formatter` and `FormattingOptions` be compatible is more important.
- For the same reason, renamed `alignment`/`get_alignment` to `aling`/`get_align`.
- Deviating from my initial idea, `Formatter::with_options` returns a `Formatter` which has the lifetime of the `self` reference as its generic lifetime parameter (in the original API spec, the generic lifetime of the returned `Formatter` was the generic lifetime used by `self` instead). Otherwise, one could construct two `Formatter`s that both mutably borrow the same underlying buffer, which would be unsound. This solution still has performance benefits over simply using `Formatter::new`, so I believe it is worthwhile to keep this method.
Stabilize noop_waker
Tracking Issue: #98286
This is a handy feature that's been used widely in tests and example async code and it'd be nice to make it available to users.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-async`
Fix missing newlines that rustfmt removed.
fix trailing whitespace
Fix duplicate word.
Reformat panic reasons into a list
remove trailing whitespace 2 electric boogaloo
Change verbe tense.
Integrate suggestions
Bump boostrap compiler to new beta
Currently failing due to something about the const stability checks and `panic!`. I'm not sure why though since I wasn't able to see any PRs merged in the past few days that would result in a `cfg(bootstrap)` that shouldn't be removed. cc `@RalfJung` #131349
Use consistent wording in docs, use is zero instead of is 0
In documentation, wording of _"`rhs` is zero"_ and _"`rhs` is 0"_ is intermixed. This is especially visible [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.usize.html#method.div_ceil).
This changes all occurrences to _"`rhs` is zero"_ for better readability.
This reduces code sizes and better respects programmer intent when
marking inline(never). Previously such a marking was essentially ignored
for generic functions, as we'd still inline them in remote crates.
btree: add `{Entry,VacantEntry}::insert_entry`
This matches the recently-stabilized methods on `HashMap` entries. I've
reused tracking issue #65225 for now, but we may want to split it.
btree: don't leak value if destructor of key panics
This PR fixes a regression from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84904.
The `BTreeMap` already attempts to handle panicking destructors of the key-value pairs by continuing to execute the remaining destructors after one destructor panicked. However, after #84904 the destructor of a value in a key-value pair gets skipped if the destructor of the key panics, only continuing with the next key-value pair. This PR reverts to the behavior before #84904 to also drop the corresponding value if the destructor of a key panics.
This avoids potential memory leaks and can fix the soundness of programs that rely on the destructors being executed (even though this should not be relied upon, because the std collections currently do not guarantee that the remaining elements are dropped after a panic in a destructor).
cc `@Amanieu` because you had opinions on panicking destructors
Use attributes for `dangling_pointers_from_temporaries` lint
Checking for dangling pointers by function name isn't ideal, and leaves out certain pointer-returning methods that don't follow the `as_ptr` naming convention. Using an attribute for this lint cleans things up and allows more thorough coverage of other methods, such as `UnsafeCell::get()`.
Add vec_deque::Iter::as_slices and friends
Add the following methods, that work similarly to VecDeque::as_slices:
- alloc::collections::vec_deque::Iter::as_slices
- alloc::collections::vec_deque::IterMut::into_slices
- alloc::collections::vec_deque::IterMut::as_slices
- alloc::collections::vec_deque::IterMut::as_mut_slices
Obtaining slices from a VecDeque iterator was not previously possible.
They are unusual methods. The docs don't really describe the cases when
they might be useful (as opposed to just `get`), and the examples don't
demonstrate the interesting cases at all.
This commit improves the docs and the examples.
btree: simplify the backdoor between set and map
The internal `btree::Recover` trait acted as a private API between
`BTreeSet` and `BTreeMap`, but we can use `pub(_)` restrictions these
days, and some of the methods don't need special handling anymore.
* `BTreeSet::get` can use `BTreeMap::get_key_value`
* `BTreeSet::take` can use `BTreeMap::remove_entry`
* `BTreeSet::replace` does need help, but this now uses a `pub(super)`
method on `BTreeMap` instead of the trait.
* `btree::Recover` is now removed.
The internal `btree::Recover` trait acted as a private API between
`BTreeSet` and `BTreeMap`, but we can use `pub(_)` restrictions these
days, and some of the methods don't need special handling anymore.
* `BTreeSet::get` can use `BTreeMap::get_key_value`
* `BTreeSet::take` can use `BTreeMap::remove_entry`
* `BTreeSet::replace` does need help, but this now uses a `pub(super)`
method on `BTreeMap` instead of the trait.
* `btree::Recover` is now removed.
split up the first paragraph of doc comments for better summaries
used `./x clippy -Aclippy::all '-Wclippy::too_long_first_doc_paragraph' library/core library/alloc` to find these issues.
Implement `From<&mut {slice}>` for `Box/Rc/Arc<{slice}>`
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/424
New API:
```rust
impl<T: Clone> From<&mut [T]> for Box<[T]>
impl From<&mut str> for Box<str>
impl From<&mut CStr> for Box<CStr>
impl From<&mut OsStr> for Box<OsStr>
impl From<&mut Path> for Box<Path>
impl<T: Clone> From<&mut [T]> for Rc<[T]>
impl From<&mut str> for Rc<str>
impl From<&mut CStr> for Rc<CStr>
impl From<&mut OsStr> for Rc<OsStr>
impl From<&mut Path> for Rc<Path>
impl<T: Clone> From<&mut [T]> for Arc<[T]>
impl From<&mut str> for Arc<str>
impl From<&mut CStr> for Arc<CStr>
impl From<&mut OsStr> for Arc<OsStr>
impl From<&mut Path> for Arc<Path>
```
Since they are trait implementations, I think these are insta-stable.
As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/424#issuecomment-2299415749, a crater run might be needed.
Rc/Arc: don't leak the allocation if drop panics
Currently, when the last `Rc<T>` or `Arc<T>` is dropped and the destructor of `T` panics, the allocation will be leaked. This leak is unnecessary since the data cannot be (safely) accessed again and `Box` already deallocates in this case, so let's do the same for `Rc` and `Arc`, too.
Const stability checks v2
The const stability system has served us well ever since `const fn` were first stabilized. It's main feature is that it enforces *recursive* validity -- a stable const fn cannot internally make use of unstable const features without an explicit marker in the form of `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]`. This is done to make sure that we don't accidentally expose unstable const features on stable in a way that would be hard to take back. As part of this, it is enforced that a `#[rustc_const_stable]` can only call `#[rustc_const_stable]` functions. However, some problems have been coming up with increased usage:
- It is baffling that we have to mark private or even unstable functions as `#[rustc_const_stable]` when they are used as helpers in regular stable `const fn`, and often people will rather add `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` instead which was not our intention.
- The system has several gaping holes: a private `const fn` without stability attributes whose inherited stability (walking up parent modules) is `#[stable]` is allowed to call *arbitrary* unstable const operations, but can itself be called from stable `const fn`. Similarly, `#[allow_internal_unstable]` on a macro completely bypasses the recursive nature of the check.
Fundamentally, the problem is that we have *three* disjoint categories of functions, and not enough attributes to distinguish them:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features
Functions in the first two categories cannot use unstable const features and they can only call functions from the first two categories.
This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.
Also, all the holes mentioned above have been closed. There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to be manually marked `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` to be sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special case so IMO it's fine.
The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked), it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or `#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply const-stability.
Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]` functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding `#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No other attributes are required.
Also see the updated dev-guide at https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/2098.
I think in the future we may want to tweak this further, so that in the hopefully common case where a public function's const-stability just exactly mirrors its regular stability, we never have to add any attribute. But right now, once the function is stable this requires `#[rustc_const_stable]`.
### Open question
There is one point I could see we might want to do differently, and that is putting `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions (but not intrinsics) in category 2 by default, and requiring an extra attribute for `#[rustc_const_not_exposed_on_stable]` or so. This would require a bunch of extra annotations, but would have the advantage that turning a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` into `#[rustc_const_stable]` will never change the way the function is const-checked. Currently, we often discover in the const stabilization PR that a function needs some other unstable const things, and then we rush to quickly deal with that. In this alternative universe, we'd work towards getting rid of the `rustc_const_not_exposed_on_stable` before stabilization, and once that is done stabilization becomes a trivial matter. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` would then only be used for intrinsics.
I think I like this idea, but might want to do it in a follow-up PR, as it will need a whole bunch of annotations in the standard library. Also, we probably want to convert all const intrinsics to the "new" form (`#[rustc_intrinsic]` instead of an `extern` block) before doing this to avoid having to deal with two different ways of declaring intrinsics.
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` `@rust-lang/libs-api`
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129815 (but not finished since this is not yet sufficient to safely let us expose `const fn` from hashbrown)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131073 by making it so that const-stable functions are always stable
try-job: test-various
