Import `SourceFile`s from crate before decoding foreign `Span`
Fixes#92163Fixes#92014
When writing to the incremental cache, we encode all `Span`s
we encounter, regardless of whether or not their `SourceFile`
comes from the local crate, or from a foreign crate.
When we decode a `Span`, we use the `StableSourceFileId` we encoded
to locate the matching `SourceFile` in the current session. If this
id corresponds to a `SourceFile` from another crate, then we need to
have already imported that `SourceFile` into our current session.
This usually happens automatically during resolution / macro expansion,
when we try to resolve definitions from other crates. In certain cases,
however, we may try to load a `Span` from a transitive dependency
without having ever imported the `SourceFile`s from that crate, leading
to an ICE.
This PR fixes the issue by enconding the `SourceFile`'s `CrateNum`
when we encode a `Span`. During decoding, we call `imported_source_files()`
when we encounter a foreign `CrateNum`, which ensure that all
`SourceFile`s from that crate are imported into the current session.
Refactor variance diagnostics to work with more types
Instead of special-casing mutable pointers/references, we
now support general generic types (currently, we handle
`ty::Ref`, `ty::RawPtr`, and `ty::Adt`)
When a `ty::Adt` is involved, we show an additional note
explaining which of the type's generic parameters is
invariant (e.g. the `T` in `Cell<T>`). Currently, we don't
explain *why* a particular generic parameter ends up becoming
invariant. In the general case, this could require printing
a long 'backtrace' of types, so doing this would be
more suitable for a follow-up PR.
We still only handle the case where our variance switches
to `ty::Invariant`.
Instead of special-casing mutable pointers/references, we
now support general generic types (currently, we handle
`ty::Ref`, `ty::RawPtr`, and `ty::Adt`)
When a `ty::Adt` is involved, we show an additional note
explaining which of the type's generic parameters is
invariant (e.g. the `T` in `Cell<T>`). Currently, we don't
explain *why* a particular generic parameter ends up becoming
invariant. In the general case, this could require printing
a long 'backtrace' of types, so doing this would be
more suitable for a follow-up PR.
We still only handle the case where our variance switches
to `ty::Invariant`.
Add codegen option for branch protection and pointer authentication on AArch64
The branch-protection codegen option enables the use of hint-space pointer
authentication code for AArch64 targets.
Print space after formal generic params in fn type
Follow-up to #92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($ty:ty) => {
stringify!($ty)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(for<'a> fn(&'a u8)));
}
```
Before: `for<'a>fn(&'a u8)`
After: `for<'a> fn(&'a u8)`
The pretty printer's `print_formal_generic_params` already prints formal generic params correctly with a space, we just need to call it when printing BareFn types instead of reimplementing the printing incorrectly without a space.
83b15bfe1c/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state.rs (L1394-L1400)
Visit expressions in-order when resolving pattern bindings
[edited:] Visit the pattern's sub-expressions before defining any bindings.
Otherwise, we might get into a case where a Lit/Range expression in a pattern has a qpath pointing to a Ident pattern that is defined after it, causing an ICE when lowering to HIR. I have a more detailed explanation in the issue linked.
Fixes#92100
Parse and suggest moving where clauses after equals for type aliases
~Mostly the same as #90076, but doesn't make any syntax changes.~ Whether or not we want to land the syntax changes, we should parse the invalid where clause position and suggest moving.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@petrochenkov` you might have thoughts on implementation
This issue was fixed using a hacky recursion "fuel" argument, but the
issue was never minimized nor was a regression test added. The
underlying bug is still unfixed, so this test should help with fixing it
and removing the `recurse` hack.
Tighten span when suggesting lifetime on path
This is kind of a hack.
Really the issue here is that we want to suggest the segment's span if the path resolves to something defined outside of the macro, and the macro's span if it resolves to something defined within.. I'll look into seeing if we can do something like that.
Fixes#92324
r? `@cjgillot`
Add a test suite for stringify macro
This attempts to cover the behavior of `stringify!` on various interpolated syntax tree nodes.
The pretty printer has a history of unsightly whitespace (double spaces, missing spaces, spaces where there shouldn't be spaces) — #91437, #91562, #91568. There are several such issues left; the test cases that I consider to be currently behaving incorrectly are marked with `// FIXME` in the PR.
Add test cases for issue #26186Closes#26186
It seems that issue #26186 has been solved at some point since the issue has been last updated. I've merged together the examples that were supplied by `@Osspial,` `@Mark-Simulacrum,` `@Diggsey,` `@eefriedman` and `@shepmaster,` so that we can add this to the testing suite and prevent these issues from re-occurring.
Relax priv-in-pub lint on generic bounds and where clauses of trait impls.
The priv-in-pub lint is a legacy mechanism of the compiler, supplanted by a reachability-based [type privacy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2145-type-privacy.md) analysis. This PR does **not** relax type privacy; it only relaxes the lint (as proposed by the type privacy RFC) in the case of trait impls.
## Current Behavior
On public trait impls, it's currently an **error** to have a `where` bound constraining a private type with a trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
struct Priv {}
impl Trait for Priv {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Priv: Trait // ERROR
{}
```
...and it's a **warning** to have have a public type constrained by a private trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
pub struct Pub {}
trait Priv {}
impl Priv for Pub {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Pub: Priv // WARNING
{}
```
This lint applies to `where` clauses in other contexts, too; e.g. on free functions:
```rust
struct Priv<T>(T);
pub trait Pub {}
impl<T: Pub> Pub for Priv<T> {}
pub fn function<T>()
where
Priv<T>: Pub // WARNING
{}
```
**These constraints could be relaxed without issue.**
## New Behavior
This lint is relaxed for `where` clauses on trait impls, such that it's okay to have a `where` bound constraining a private type with a trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
struct Priv {}
impl Trait for Priv {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Priv: Trait // OK
{}
```
...and it's okay to have a public type constrained by a private trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
pub struct Pub {}
trait Priv {}
impl Priv for Pub {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Pub: Priv // OK
{}
```
## Rationale
While the priv-in-pub lint is not essential for soundness, it *can* help programmers avoid pitfalls that would make their libraries difficult to use by others. For instance, such a lint *is* useful for free functions; e.g. if a downstream crate tries to call the `function` in the previous snippet in a generic context:
```rust
fn callsite<T>()
where
Priv<T>: Pub // ERROR: omitting this bound is a compile error, but including it is too
{
function::<T>()
}
```
...it cannot do so without repeating `function`'s `where` bound, which we cannot do because `Priv` is out-of-scope. A lint for this case is arguably helpful.
However, this same reasoning **doesn't** hold for trait impls. To call an unconstrained method on a public trait impl with private bounds, you don't need to forward those private bounds, you can forward the public trait:
```rust
mod upstream {
pub trait Trait {
fn method(&self) {}
}
pub struct Type<T>(T);
pub struct Pub<T>(T);
trait Priv {}
impl<T: Priv> Priv for Pub<T> {}
impl<T> Trait for Type<T>
where
Pub<T>: Priv // WARNING
{}
}
mod downstream {
use super::upstream::*;
fn function<T>(value: Type<T>)
where
Type<T>: Trait // <- no private deets!
{
value.method();
}
}
```
**This PR only eliminates the lint on trait impls.** It leaves it intact for all other contexts, including trait definitions, inherent impls, and function definitions. It doesn't need to exist in those cases either, but I figured I'd first target a case where it's mostly pointless.
## Other Notes
- See discussion [on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/relax.20priv-in-pub.20lint.20for.20trait.20impl.20.60where.60.20bounds/near/222458397).
- This PR effectively reverts #79291.
CTFE eval_fn_call: use FnAbi to determine argument skipping and compatibility
This makes use of the `FnAbi` type in CTFE/Miri, which `@eddyb` has been saying for years is what we should do.^^ `FnAbi` is used to
- determine which arguments to skip (rather than the previous heuristic of skipping ZST arguments with the Rust ABI)
- impose further restrictions on whether caller and callee are consistent in how a given argument is passed
I was hoping it would also simplify the code, but that is not the case -- the previous type compatibility checks are still required (AFAIK), only the ZST skipping is gone and that took barely any code. We also need some hacks because `FnAbi` assumes a certain way of implementing `caller_location` (by passing extra arguments), but Miri can just read the caller location from the call stack so it doesn't need those arguments. (The fact that every backend has to separately implement support for these arguments seems suboptimal -- looks like this might have been better implemented on the MIR level.) To avoid having to implement those unnecessary arguments in Miri, we just compute *whether* the argument is present on the caller/callee side, but don't actually pass that argument around.
I have no idea if this looks the way `@eddyb` thinks it should look... but it makes Miri's test suite pass. ;)
One of rustc's tests fails unfortunately (`ui/const-generics/issues/issue-67739.rs`), some const generic code that is evaluated too early -- I think that should raise `TooGeneric` but instead it ICEs. My assumption is this is some FnAbi code that has not been properly tested on polymorphic code, but it might also be me calling that FnAbi code the wrong way.
r? `@oli-obk` `@eddyb`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56166
Miri PR at https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1928
Fixes#92163Fixes#92014
When writing to the incremental cache, we encode all `Span`s
we encounter, regardless of whether or not their `SourceFile`
comes from the local crate, or from a foreign crate.
When we decode a `Span`, we use the `StableSourceFileId` we encoded
to locate the matching `SourceFile` in the current session. If this
id corresponds to a `SourceFile` from another crate, then we need to
have already imported that `SourceFile` into our current session.
This usually happens automatically during resolution / macro expansion,
when we try to resolve definitions from other crates. In certain cases,
however, we may try to load a `Span` from a transitive dependency
without having ever imported the `SourceFile`s from that crate, leading
to an ICE.
This PR fixes the issue by calling `imported_source_files()`
when we encounter a `SourceFile` with a foreign `CrateNum`.
This ensures that all `SourceFile`s from that crate are imported
into the current session.
Use panic() instead of panic!() in some places in core.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92068 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92140.
This avoids the `panic!()` macro in a few potentially hot paths. This becomes more relevant when switching `core` to Rust 2021, as it'll avoid format_args!() and save some compilation time. (It doesn't make a huge difference, but still.) (Also the errors in const panic become slightly nicer.)
Fix duplicate derive clone suggestion
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91492
The addition of:
```rust
derives.sort();
derives.dedup();
```
is what actually solves the problem.
The rest is just cleanup.
I want to improve the diagnostic message to provide the suggestion as a proper diff but ran into some problems, so I'll attempt that again in a follow up PR.
