Stabilize some Option methods as const
Stabilize the following methods of `Option` as const:
- `is_some`
- `is_none`
- `as_ref`
These methods are currently const under the unstable feature `const_option` (tracking issue: #67441).
I believe these methods to be eligible for stabilization because of the stabilization of #49146 (Allow if and match in constants) and the trivial implementations, see also: [PR#75463](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75463).
Related: #76225
Let user see the full type of type-length limit error
Seeing the full type of the error is sometimes essential to diagnosing the problem, but the type itself is too long to be displayed in the terminal in a useful fashion. This change solves this dilemma by writing the full offending type name to a file, and displays this filename as a note.
> note: the full type name been written to '$TEST_BUILD_DIR/issues/issue-22638/issue-22638.long-type.txt'
Closes#76777
Remove MMX from Rust
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/890
This removes most of MMX from Rust (tests pass with small changes), keeping stable `is_x86_feature_detected!("mmx")` working.
De-couple Python and bootstrap slightly
This revises rustbuild's entry points from Python to rely less on magic environment variables, preferring to use Cargo-provided environment variables where feasible.
Notably, BUILD_DIR and BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG are *not* moved, because both more-or-less have some non-trivial discovery logic and replicating it in rustbuild seems unfortunate; if it moved to Cargo that would be a different story.
Best reviewed by-commit.
Stabilize the following methods of `Option` as const:
- `is_some`
- `is_none`
- `as_ref`
Possible because of stabilization of #49146 (Allow if and match in constants).
New MIR optimization pass to reduce branches on match of tuples of enums
Fixes#68867 by adding a new pass that turns something like
```rust
let x: Option<()>;
let y: Option<()>;
match (x,y) {
(Some(_), Some(_)) => {0},
_ => {1}
}
```
into something like
```rust
let x: Option<()>;
let y: Option<()>;
let discriminant_x = // get discriminant of x
let discriminant_y = // get discriminant of x
if discriminant_x != discriminant_y {1} else {0}
```
The opt-diffs still have the old basic blocks like
```
bb3: {
_8 = discriminant((*(_4.1: &ViewportPercentageLength))); // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:21:21: 21:30
switchInt(move _8) -> [1_isize: bb7, otherwise: bb2]; // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:21:21: 21:30
}
bb4: {
_9 = discriminant((*(_4.1: &ViewportPercentageLength))); // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:22:23: 22:34
switchInt(move _9) -> [2_isize: bb8, otherwise: bb2]; // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:22:23: 22:34
}
bb5: {
_10 = discriminant((*(_4.1: &ViewportPercentageLength))); // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:23:23: 23:34
switchInt(move _10) -> [3_isize: bb9, otherwise: bb2]; // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:23:23: 23:34
}
```
These do get removed on later passes. I'm not sure if I should include those passes in the test to make it clear?
Don't allow implementing trait directly on type-alias-impl-trait
This is specifically disallowed by the RFC, but we never added a check
for it.
Fixes#76202
Validate constants during `const_eval_raw`
This PR implements the groundwork for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72396
* constants are now validated during `const_eval_raw`
* to prevent cycle errors, we do not validate references to statics anymore beyond the fact that they are not dangling
* the `const_eval` query ICEs if used on `static` items
* as a side effect promoteds are now evaluated to `ConstValue::Scalar` again (since they are just a reference to the actual promoted allocation in most cases).
Some promotion cleanup
Based on top of both https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75502 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75585, this does some cleanup of the promotion code. The last 2 commits are new.
* Remove the remaining cases where `const fn` is treated different from `fn`. This means no longer promoting ptr-to-int casts, raw ptr operations, and union field accesses in `const fn` -- or anywhere, for that matter. These are all unstable in const-context so this should not break any stable code. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75586.
* ~~Promote references to statics even outside statics (i.e., in functions) for consistency.~~
* Promote `&mut []` everywhere, not just in non-`const` functions, for consistency.
* Explain why we do not promote deref's of statics outside statics. ~~(This is the only remaining direct user of `const_kind`.)~~
This can only land once the other two PRs land; I am mostly putting this up already because I couldn't wait ;) and to get some feedback from `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` .
shim: monomorphic `FnPtrShim`s during construction
Fixes#69925.
This PR adjusts MIR shim construction so that substitutions are applied to function pointer shims during construction, rather than during codegen (as determined by `substs_for_mir_body`).
r? `@eddyb`
Implement a generic Destination Propagation optimization on MIR
This takes the work that was originally started by `@eddyb` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47954, and then explored by me in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71003, and implements it in a general (ie. not limited to acyclic CFGs) and dataflow-driven way (so that no additional infrastructure in rustc is needed).
The pass is configured to run at `mir-opt-level=2` and higher only. To enable it by default, some followup work on it is still needed:
* Performance needs to be evaluated. I did some light optimization work and tested against `tuple-stress`, which caused trouble in my last attempt, but didn't go much in depth here.
* We can also enable the pass only at `opt-level=2` and higher, if it is too slow to run in debug mode, but fine when optimizations run anyways.
* Debuginfo needs to be fixed after locals are merged. I did not look into what is required for this.
* Live ranges of locals (aka `StorageLive` and `StorageDead`) are currently deleted. We either need to decide that this is fine, or if not, merge the variable's live ranges (or remove these statements entirely – https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68622).
Some benchmarks of the pass were done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72635.
give *even better* suggestion when matching a const range
notice that the err already has "constant defined here"
so this is now *exceedingly clear*
extension to #76222
r? @estebank
do not inline black_box when building for Miri
We cannot do the assembly trick in Miri, but let's at least make sure MIR inlining does not circumvent the black_box.
Also use black_box instead of local optimization barriers in a few const tests.
Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns
This adds a regression test for checking `or-patterns` in MIR as shown in #75439.
This doesn't introduce a fix as I'm not sure where it would go(I suspect maybe here: src/librustc_mir_build/build/matches/mod.rs), and I'm not particularly able to fix it.
cc: @lzutao
As a side effect, we now represent most promoteds as `ConstValue::Scalar` again. This is useful because all implict promoteds are just references anyway and most explicit promoteds are numeric arguments to `asm!` or SIMD instructions.
