Add initial implementation of HIR-based WF checking for diagnostics
During well-formed checking, we walk through all types 'nested' in
generic arguments. For example, WF-checking `Option<MyStruct<u8>>`
will cause us to check `MyStruct<u8>` and `u8`. However, this is done
on a `rustc_middle::ty::Ty`, which has no span information. As a result,
any errors that occur will have a very general span (e.g. the
definintion of an associated item).
This becomes a problem when macros are involved. In general, an
associated type like `type MyType = Option<MyStruct<u8>>;` may
have completely different spans for each nested type in the HIR. Using
the span of the entire associated item might end up pointing to a macro
invocation, even though a user-provided span is available in one of the
nested types.
This PR adds a framework for HIR-based well formed checking. This check
is only run during error reporting, and is used to obtain a more precise
span for an existing error. This is accomplished by individually
checking each 'nested' type in the HIR for the type, allowing us to
find the most-specific type (and span) that produces a given error.
The majority of the changes are to the error-reporting code. However,
some of the general trait code is modified to pass through more
information.
Since this has no soundness implications, I've implemented a minimal
version to begin with, which can be extended over time. In particular,
this only works for HIR items with a corresponding `DefId` (e.g. it will
not work for WF-checking performed within function bodies).
During well-formed checking, we walk through all types 'nested' in
generic arguments. For example, WF-checking `Option<MyStruct<u8>>`
will cause us to check `MyStruct<u8>` and `u8`. However, this is done
on a `rustc_middle::ty::Ty`, which has no span information. As a result,
any errors that occur will have a very general span (e.g. the
definintion of an associated item).
This becomes a problem when macros are involved. In general, an
associated type like `type MyType = Option<MyStruct<u8>>;` may
have completely different spans for each nested type in the HIR. Using
the span of the entire associated item might end up pointing to a macro
invocation, even though a user-provided span is available in one of the
nested types.
This PR adds a framework for HIR-based well formed checking. This check
is only run during error reporting, and is used to obtain a more precise
span for an existing error. This is accomplished by individually
checking each 'nested' type in the HIR for the type, allowing us to
find the most-specific type (and span) that produces a given error.
The majority of the changes are to the error-reporting code. However,
some of the general trait code is modified to pass through more
information.
Since this has no soundness implications, I've implemented a minimal
version to begin with, which can be extended over time. In particular,
this only works for HIR items with a corresponding `DefId` (e.g. it will
not work for WF-checking performed within function bodies).
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87107 (Loop over all opaque types instead of looking at just the first one with the same DefId)
- #87158 (Suggest full enum variant for local modules)
- #87174 (Stabilize `[T; N]::map()`)
- #87179 (Mark `const_trait_impl` as active)
- #87180 (feat(rustdoc): open sidebar menu when links inside it are focused)
- #87188 (Add GUI test for auto-hide-trait-implementations setting)
- #87200 (TAIT: Infer all inference variables in opaque type substitutions via InferCx)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
TAIT: Infer all inference variables in opaque type substitutions via InferCx
The previous algorithm was correct for the example given in its
documentation, but when the TAIT was declared as a free item
instead of an associated item, the generic parameters were the
wrong ones.
cc `@spastorino`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Loop over all opaque types instead of looking at just the first one with the same DefId
This exposed a bug in VecMap and is needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86410 anyway
r? ``@spastorino``
cc ``@nikomatsakis``
The previous algorithm was correct for the example given in its
documentation, but when the TAIT was declared as a free item
instead of an associated item, the generic parameters were the
wrong ones.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86983 (Add or improve natvis definitions for common standard library types)
- #87069 (ExprUseVisitor: Treat ByValue use of Copy types as ImmBorrow)
- #87138 (Correct invariant documentation for `steps_between`)
- #87145 (Make --cap-lints and related options leave crate hash alone)
- #87161 (RFC2229: Use the correct place type)
- #87162 (Fix type decl layout "overflow")
- #87167 (Fix sidebar display on small devices)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix sidebar display on small devices
Part of #87059.
Instead of hiding the sidebar on small devices, we instead move it out of the viewport so that it remains "visible" to our text only users.
Could you confirm it works for you `@ahicks92` and `@DataTriny` please? You can give it a try at [this URL](https://guillaume-gomez.fr/rustdoc-test/test_docs/index.html).
r? `@notriddle`
RFC2229: Use the correct place type
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87097
The ICE occurred because instead of looking at the type of the place after all the projections are applied, we instead looked at the `base_ty` of the Place to decide whether a discriminant should be read of not. This lead to two issues:
1. the kind of the type is not necessarily `Adt` since we only look at the `base_ty`, it could be instead `Ref` for example
2. if the kind of the type is `Adt` you could still be looking at the wrong variant to make a decision on whether the discriminant should be read or not
r? `@nikomatsakis`
fix dead link for method in trait of blanket impl from third party crate
fix#86620
* changes `href` method to raise the actual error it had instead of an `Option`
* set the href link correctly in case of an error
I did not manage to make a small reproducer, I think it happens in a situation where
* crate A expose a trait with a blanket impl
* crate B use the trait from crate A
* crate C use types from crate B
* building docs for crate C without dependencies
r? `@jyn514`
Replace associated item bound vars with placeholders when projecting
Fixes#76407Fixes#76826
Similar, but more limited, to #85499. This allows us to handle things like `for<'a> <T as Trait>::Assoc<'a>` but not `for<'a> <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc`, unblocking GATs.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Add -Zfuture-incompat-test to assist with testing future-incompat reports.
This adds a `-Zfuture-incompat-test` cli flag to assist with testing future-incompatible reports. This flag causes all lints to be treated as a future-incompatible lint, and will emit a report for them. This is being added so that Cargo's testsuite can reliably test the reporting infrastructure. Right now, Cargo relies on using array_into_iter as a test subject. Since the breaking "future incompatible" lints are never intended to last forever, this means Cargo's testsuite would always need to keep changing to choose different lints (for example, #86330 proposed dropping that moniker for array_into_iter). With this flag, Cargo's tests can trigger any lint and check for the report.
Reuse CrateNum for proc-macro crates even when cross-compiling
Proc-macros are always compiled for the host, so this should be the same
in every way as recompiling the crate.
I am not sure why the previous code special-cased the target, since the
compiler properly gives an error when trying to load a crate for a
different host:
```
error[E0461]: couldn't find crate `dependency` with expected target triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--> /home/joshua/rustc4/src/test/ui/cfg-dependent.rs:8:2
|
LL | dependency::is_64();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `dependency`, target triple i686-unknown-linux-gnu: /home/joshua/rustc4/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/cfg-dependent/auxiliary/libdependency.so
```
I think another possible fix is to remove the check altogether. But I'm
not sure, and this fix works, so I'm not making the larger change here.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56935.
r? `@petrochenkov` cc `@alexcrichton`
Proc-macros are always compiled for the host, so this should be the same
in every way as recompiling the crate.
I am not sure why the previous code special-cased the target, since the
compiler properly gives an error when trying to load a crate for a
different host:
```
error[E0461]: couldn't find crate `dependency` with expected target triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--> /home/joshua/rustc4/src/test/ui/cfg-dependent.rs:8:2
|
LL | dependency::is_64();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `dependency`, target triple i686-unknown-linux-gnu: /home/joshua/rustc4/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/cfg-dependent/auxiliary/libdependency.so
```
I think another possible fix is to remove the check altogether. But I'm
not sure, and this fix works, so I'm not making the larger change here.
Fix codeblocks overflow
Fixes#87043.
Instead of completely relying on `pulldown-cmark` (and its potential changes), I decided to move the generation of codeblocks HTML directly in rustdoc so we can unify the DOM and the CSS classes.
r? `@Nemo157`
expand: Support helper attributes for built-in derive macros
This is needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86735 (derive macro `Default` should have a helper attribute `default`).
With this PR we can specify helper attributes for built-in derives using syntax `#[rustc_builtin_macro(MacroName, attributes(attr1, attr2, ...))]` which mirrors equivalent syntax for proc macros `#[proc_macro_derive(MacroName, attributes(attr1, attr2, ...))]`.
Otherwise expansion infra was already ready for this.
The attribute parsing code is shared between proc macro derives and built-in macros (`fn parse_macro_name_and_helper_attrs`).
