incr-comp: hash and serialize span end line/column
Hash both the length and the end location (line/column) of a span. If we
hash only the length, for example, then two otherwise equal spans with
different end locations will have the same hash. This can cause a
problem during incremental compilation wherein a previous result for a
query that depends on the end location of a span will be incorrectly
reused when the end location of the span it depends on has changed. A
similar analysis applies if some query depends specifically on the
length of the span, but we only hash the end location. So hash both.
Fix#46744, fix#59954, fix#63161, fix#73640, fix#73967, fix#74890, fix#75900
---
See #74890 for a more in-depth analysis.
I haven't thought about what other problems this root cause could be responsible for. Please let me know if anything springs to mind. I believe the issue has existed since the inception of incremental compilation.
This commit grepped for LLVM_VERSION_GE, LLVM_VERSION_LT, get_major_version and
min-llvm-version and statically evaluated every expression possible
(and sensible) assuming that the LLVM version is >=9 now
Test default values for const parameters.
The last topic on #78433
I originally intended to place these tests in a single file, however, due to them being parser errors that are fatal, they must be in separate files to be detected.
Thanks, ``@lcnr`` for mentoring me on this PR.
r? ``@lcnr``
extend const generics test suite
should implement most of #78433, especially all parts of [the hackmd](https://hackmd.io/WnFmN4MjRCqAjGmYfYcu2A?view) which I did not explicitly mention in that issue.
r? ``@varkor``
Note, in the coverage-reports test, the comment about MacOS was wrong.
The setting is based on config.toml llvm `optimize` setting. There
doesn't appear to be any environment variable I can check, and I
don't think we should add one. Testing the binary itself is a more
reliable way to check anyway.
For the coverage-spanview test, I removed the dependency on sed
altogether, which is much less ugly than trying to work around the
MacOS sed differences.
I tested these changes on Linux, Windows, and Mac.
Do not collect tokens for doc comments
Doc comment is a single token and AST has all the information to re-create it precisely.
Doc comments are also responsible for majority of calls to `collect_tokens` (with `num_calls == 1` and `num_calls == 0`, cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78736).
(I also moved token collection into `fn parse_attribute` to deduplicate code a bit.)
r? `@Aaron1011`
Support inlining diverging function calls
The existing heuristic does penalize diverging calls to some degree, but since
it never inlined them previously it might need some further modifications.
Additionally introduce storage markers for all temporaries created by
the inliner. The temporary introduced for destination rebrorrow, didn't
use them previously.
Add flags customizing behaviour of MIR inlining
* `-Zinline-mir-threshold` to change the default threshold.
* `-Zinline-mir-hint-threshold` to change the threshold used by
functions with inline hint.
Having those as configurable flags makes it possible to experiment with with
different inlining thresholds and substantially increase test coverage of MIR
inlining when used with increased thresholds (for example, necessary to test
#78844).
look at assoc ct, check the type of nodes
an example where types matter are function objects, see the added test which previously passed.
Now does a shallow comparison of unevaluated constants.
r? ```@oli-obk```
It was only ever used with Vec<u8> anyway. This simplifies some things.
- It no longer needs to be flushed, because that's a no-op anyway for
a Vec<u8>.
- Writing to a Vec<u8> never fails.
- No #[cfg(test)] code is needed anymore to use `realstd` instead of
`std`, because Vec comes from alloc, not std (like Write).
(rustdoc) [src] link for types defined by macros shows invocation, not defintion
Previously the [src] link on types defined by a macro pointed to the macro definition.
This pr makes the Clean-Implementation for Spans aware of macro defined types, so that the link points to the invocation instead.
I'm not totally sure if it's okay to add the 'macro awareness' in the Clean-Implementation, because it erases that knowledge for all following code. Maybe it would be more sensible to add the check only for the link generation at 25f6938da4/src/librustdoc/html/render/mod.rs (L1619)Closes#39726.
Add missing newline to error message of the default OOM hook
Currently the default OOM hook in libstd does not end the error message with a newline:
```
memory allocation of 4 bytes failedtimeout: the monitored command dumped core
/playground/tools/entrypoint.sh: line 11: 7 Aborted timeout --signal=KILL ${timeout} "$`@"`
```
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=030d8223eb57dfe47ef157709aa26542
This is because the `fmt::Arguments` passed to `dumb_print()` does not end with a newline. All other calls to `dumb_print()` in libstd pass a `\n`-ended `fmt::Arguments` to `dumb_print()`. For example:
25f6938da4/library/std/src/sys_common/util.rs (L18)
I think the `\n` was forgotten in #51264.
This PR appends `\n` to the error string.
~~Note that I didn't add a test, because I didn't find tests for functions in ` library/std/src/alloc.rs` or a test that is similar to the test of this change would be.~~ *Edit: CI told me there is an existing test. Sorry.*
Use check-pass instead of build-pass in some consts ui test suits
Helps with #62277
Changed tests modified by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57175 because of the stabilization `#![feature(const_let)]`.
They should be compile-fail because the feature gate checking disallow the feature before stabilization. So the feature gate checking have nothing to do with codegen according to https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-gate-ck.html.
Make it more clear what an about async fn's returns when referring to what it returns
see #76547
This is *likely* not the ONLY place that this happens to be unclear, but we can move this fn to rustc_middle or something like that and reuse it if need be, to apply it to more diagnostics
One outstanding question I have is, if the fn returns (), should I make the message more clear (what about `fn f()` vs `fn f() -> ()`, can you tell those apart in the hir?)
R? `@tmandry`
`@rustbot` modify labels +A-diagnostics +T-compiler
