After PR #19766 added implicit coersions `*mut T -> *const T`, the explicit casts can be removed.
(The number of such casts turned out to be relatively small).
Two errors in `std::sync` are currently missing implementations of the standard error trait because they contain types which aren't `Send`.
This PR therefore requires #21312.
As discussed with @aturon, this PR removes the `Send` bound from `std::error::Error`, allowing us to implement `Error` for error types containing non-`Send` types. Current examples include `PoisonError` and `TryLockError` from `std::sync` which contain a Guard that we don't want sent between tasks.
[breaking-change]
There are a large number of places that incorrectly refer
to deriving in comments, instead of derives.
If someone could look at src/etc/generate-deriving-span-tests.py,
I'm not sure how those tests were passing before/if they were.
This is a [breaking-change] since `std::dynamic_lib::dl` is now
private.
When `LoadLibraryW()` fails, original code called `errno()` to get error
code. However, there was local allocation of `Vec` before
`LoadLibraryW()`, and it drops before `errno()`, and the drop
(deallocation) changed `errno`! Therefore `dynamic_lib::open()` thought
it always succeeded.
This commit fixes the issue.
This commit also sets Windows error mode during `LoadLibrary()` to
prevent "dll load failed" dialog.
Previous wording wasn’t clear about its actual behaviour. It could be
interpreted as answering either:
* Can current thread panic?
* Is current thread unwinding because of panic?
In accordance with [collections reform part 2][rfc] this macro has been moved to
an external [bitflags crate][crate] which is [available though
crates.io][cratesio]. Inside the standard distribution the macro has been moved
to a crate called `rustc_bitflags` for current users to continue using.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0509-collections-reform-part-2.md
[crate]: https://github.com/rust-lang/bitflags
[cratesio]: http://crates.io/crates/bitflags
The major user of `bitflags!` in terms of a public-facing possibly-stable API
today is the `FilePermissions` structure inside of `std::io`. This user,
however, will likely no longer use `bitflags!` after I/O reform has landed. To
prevent breaking APIs today, this structure remains as-is.
Current users of the `bitflags!` macro should add this to their `Cargo.toml`:
bitflags = "0.1"
and this to their crate root:
#[macro_use] extern crate bitflags;
Due to the removal of a public macro, this is a:
[breaking-change]
I searched for times when we were hiding functions with # in the documentation,
and fixed them to not use it unless neccesary.
I also made random improvements whenever I changed something. For example,
I changed Example to Examples, for consistency.
Fixes#13423
**The implementation is a direct adaptation of libcxx's condition_variable implementation.**
I also added a wait_timeout_with method, which matches the second overload in C++'s condition_variable. The implementation right now is kind of dumb but it works. There is an outstanding issue with it: as is it doesn't support the use case where a user doesn't care about poisoning and wants to continue through poison.
r? @alexcrichton @aturon
**The implementation is a direct adaptation of libcxx's
condition_variable implementation.**
pthread_cond_timedwait uses the non-monotonic system clock. It's
possible to change the clock to a monotonic via pthread_cond_attr, but
this is incompatible with static initialization. To deal with this, we
calculate the timeout using the system clock, and maintain a separate
record of the start and end times with a monotonic clock to be used for
calculation of the return value.
This PR adds rules for negative implementations. It follows pretty much what the [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0019-opt-in-builtin-traits.md) says with 1 main difference:
Instead of positive implementations override negative implementations, this have been implemented in a way that a negative implementation of `Trait` for `T` will overlap with a positive implementation, causing a coherence error.
@nikomatsakis r?
cc #13231
[breaking-change]
Originally, this was going to be discussed and revisted, however I've been working on this for months, and a rebase on top of master was about 1 flight's worth of work so I just went ahead and did it.
This gets you as far as being able to target powerpc with, eg:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/ x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc -C linker=powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc --target powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu hello.rs
Would really love to get this out before 1.0. r? @alexcrichton
It's passed to the underlying reader, so uninitialized memory == sad
times.
We might want to shrink the default buffer size as well. 64k is pretty
huge. Java uses 8k by default, and Go uses 4k for reference.
r? @alexcrichton
Also adjusted some of the FFI definitions because apparently they don't use the long pointer prefix.
Gives a free performance boost because `SRWLock` is several times faster than `CriticalRegion` on every Windows system tested.
Fixes#19962
It's passed to the underlying reader, so uninitialized memory == sad
times.
We might want to shrink the default buffer size as well. 64k is pretty
huge. Java uses 8k by default, and Go uses 4k for reference.
