Add a travis builder for wasm32-unknown-emscripten
This commits add an entry to travis matrix that will execute wasm32-unknown-emscripten tests suites.
- Emscripten for asmjs was updated to sdk-1.37.13-64bit
- The tests are run with node 8.0.0 (it can execute wasm)
- A wrapper script is used to run each test from the directory where it is (workaround for https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/issues/4542)
- Some tests are ignore, see #42629 and #42630
LLVM currently doesn't remove the "bypass if argument is zero" assembly inside branches where the value is known to be non-zero, pessimizing code that uses uN::leading_zeros
rustc: T: 'empty always holds for all types.
Fixes#42467 by special-casing `ReEmpty` to always hold, even for parameters.
The reason this is the case is that `ReEmpty` is the result of inferring a region variable with no constraints attached to it, so there is no lifetime a type would contain which would be strictly shorter.
r? @nikomatsakis
rustc_typeck: do not overlap a borrow of TypeckTables with method lookup.
If trait selection is reached, it could potentially request a closure signature, which will have to borrow the `TypeckTables` of the current function, and so those tables *should not* be mutably borrowed.
Fixes#42463.
r? @nikomatsakis
`Stdio` now implements `From<ChildStdin>`, `From<ChildStdout>`,
`From<ChildStderr>`, and `From<File>`.
The `Command::stdin`/`stdout`/`stderr` methods now take any type that
implements `Into<Stdio>`.
This makes it much easier to write shell-like command chains, piping to
one another and redirecting to and from files. Otherwise one would need
to use the unsafe and OS-specific `from_raw_fd` or `from_raw_handle`.
add playbot jokes to run-pass test
Some funny expressions that people pull out on IRC, that might actually be useful to test pathological parser behavior.
Change for-loop desugar to not borrow the iterator during the loop
This is enables the use of suspend points inside for-loops in movable generators. This is illegal in the current desugaring as `iter` is borrowed across the body.
The 'run-pass' header cause a 'ui' test to execute the result. It is used
to test the lint output, at the same time ensure those lints won't cause
the source code to become compile-fail.
12 run-pass/run-pass-fulldeps tests gained the header and are moved to
ui/ui-fulldeps. After this move, no run-pass/run-pass-fulldeps tests should
rely on the compiler's JSON message. This allows us to stop passing
`--error-format json` in run-pass tests, thus fixing #36516.
Translate array drop glue using MIR
I was a bit lazy here and used a usize-based index instead of a pointer iteration. Do you think this is important @eddyb?
r? @eddyb
This fixes leakage on panic with arrays & slices. I am using a C-style
for-loop instead of a pointer-based loop because that would be ugly-er
to implement.
extend `struct_tail` to operate over tuples
Not 100% sure why this got exposed when it wasn't before, but this struct definitely seems wrong.
Fixes#42110
r? @eddyb
add thiscall calling convention support
This support is needed for bindgen to work well on 32-bit Windows, and also enables people to begin experimenting with C++ FFI support on that platform.
Fixes#42044.
Initial implementation of declarative macros 2.0
Implement declarative macros 2.0 (rust-lang/rfcs#1584) behind `#![feature(decl_macro)]`.
Differences from `macro_rules!` include:
- new syntax: `macro m(..) { .. }` instead of `macro_rules! m { (..) => { .. } }`
- declarative macros are items:
```rust
// crate A:
pub mod foo {
m!(); // use before definition; declaration order is irrelevant
pub macro m() {} // `pub`, `pub(super)`, etc. work
}
fn main() {
foo::m!(); // named like other items
{ use foo::m as n; n!(); } // imported like other items
}
pub use foo::m; // re-exported like other items
// crate B:
extern crate A; // no need for `#[macro_use]`
A::foo::m!(); A::m!();
```
- Racket-like hygiene for items, imports, methods, fields, type parameters, privacy, etc.
- Intuitively, names in a macro definition are resolved in the macro definition's scope, not the scope in which the macro is used.
- This [explaination](http://beautifulracket.com/explainer/hygiene.html) of hygiene for Racket applies here (except for the "Breaking Hygiene" section). I wrote a similar [explanation](https://github.com/jseyfried/rfcs/blob/hygiene/text/0000-hygiene.md) for Rust.
- Generally speaking, if `fn f() { <body> }` resolves, `pub macro m() { <body> } ... m!()` also resolves, even if `m!()` is in a separate crate.
- `::foo::bar` in a `macro` behaves like `$crate::foo::bar` in a `macro_rules!`, except it can access everything visible from the `macro` (thus more permissive).
- See [`src/test/{run-pass, compile-fail}/hygiene`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/40847/commits/afe7d89858fd72b983e24727d6f4058293153c19) for examples. Small example:
```rust
mod foo {
fn f() { println!("hello world"); }
pub macro m() { f(); }
}
fn main() { foo::m!(); }
```
Limitations:
- This does not address planned changes to matchers (`expr`,`ty`, etc.), c.f. #26361.
- Lints (including stability and deprecation) and `unsafe` are not hygienic.
- adding hygiene here will be mostly or entirely backwards compatible
- Nested macro definitions (a `macro` inside another `macro`) don't always work correctly when invoked from external crates.
- pending improvements in how we encode macro definitions in crate metadata
- There is no way to "escape" hygiene without using a procedural macro.
r? @nrc
Refactor: Move the mutable parts out of LintStore. Fix#42007.
* #42007 happens because the `Session` `LintStore` is emptied when linting.
* The `Session` `LintStore` is emptied because the checker (`Early`/`LateContext`) wants ownership.
* The checker wants ownership because it wants to mutate the pass objects and lint levels.
The ownership of the whole store is not essential, only the lint levels and pass objects need to be owned. Therefore, these parts are extracted out of the `LintStore` into a separate structure `LintSession`. The "check crates" methods can operate on `&mut LintSession` instead of `&mut LintStore`.
This is a minor *breaking change* for lint writers since the `LintContext` trait is changed: the `mut_lints` and `level_stack` methods are removed. But no one outside of `librustc/lint/context.rs` is using these functions, so it should be safe.
Make RangeInclusive just a two-field struct
Not being an enum improves ergonomics and consistency, especially since NonEmpty variant wasn't prevented from being empty. It can still be iterable without an extra "done" bit by making the range have !(start <= end), which is even possible without changing the Step trait.
Implements merged https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1980; tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28237.
This is definitely a breaking change to anything consuming `RangeInclusive` directly (not as an Iterator) or constructing it without using the sugar. Is there some change that would make sense before this so compilation failures could be compatibly fixed ahead of time?
r? @aturon (as FCP proposer on the RFC)
This support is needed for bindgen to work well on 32-bit Windows, and
also enables people to begin experimenting with C++ FFI support on that
platform.
Fixes#42044.
Remove interior mutability from TraitDef by turning fields into queries
This PR gets rid of anything `std::cell` in `TraitDef` by
- moving the global list of trait impls from `TraitDef` into a query,
- moving the list of trait impls relevent for some self-type from `TraitDef` into a query
- moving the specialization graph of trait impls into a query, and
- moving `TraitDef::object_safety` into a query.
I really like how querifying things not only helps with incremental compilation and on-demand, but also just plain makes the code cleaner `:)`
There are also some smaller fixes in the PR. Commits can be reviewed separately.
r? @eddyb or @nikomatsakis
