This way we are processing all of them in a single point, rather than separately for each syntax extension kind.
Also, the standard expected/found wording is used.
It either returns the indeterminacy error, or valid (but perhaps dummy) `SyntaxExtension`.
With this change enum `Determinacy` is no longer used in libsyntax and can be moved to resolve.
The regressions in diagnosics are fixed in the next commits.
Create real working and registered (even if dummy) `SyntaxExtension`s for them.
This improves error recovery and allows to avoid all special cases for proc macro stubs (except for the error on use, of course).
The introduced dummy `SyntaxExtension`s can be used for any other inappropriately resolved macros as well.
We have to deal with dummy spans anyway
Remove def-site span from expander interfaces.
It's not used by the expansion infra, only by specific expanders, which can keep it themselves if they want it.
It was used to choose whether to apply derive markers like `#[rustc_copy_clone_marker]` or not,
but it was called before all the data required for resolution is available, so it could work incorrectly in some corner cases (like user-defined derives name `Copy` or `Eq`).
Delay the decision about markers until the proper resolution results are available instead.
It's internal to resolve and always results in `Res::Err` outside of resolve.
Instead put `DefKind::Fn`s themselves into the macro namespace, it's ok.
Proc macro stubs are items placed into macro namespase for functions that define proc macros.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52383
The rustdoc test is changed because the old test didn't actually reproduce the ICE it was supposed to reproduce.
rustdoc: set cfg(doctest) when collecting doctests
Note: This PR builds on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61199; only the last commit is specific to this PR.
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61199, we want the ability to isolate items to only when rustdoc is collecting doctests, but we can't use `cfg(test)` because of libcore's `#![cfg(not(test))]`. This PR proposes a new cfg flag, `cfg(doctest)`, specific to this situation, rather than reusing an existing flag. I've isolated it behind a feature gate so that we can contain the effects to nightly only. (A stable workaround that can be used in lieu of `#[cfg(doctest)]` is `#[cfg(rustdoc)] #[doc(hidden)]`, at least once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61351 lands.)
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62210
Now that procedural macros no longer link transitively to libsyntax,
this shouldn't be needed any more! This commit is an experiment in
removing all dynamic libraries from rustc except for librustc_driver
itself. Let's see how far we can get with that!
Remove support for 1-token lookahead from the lexer
`StringReader` maintained `peek_token` and `peek_span_src_raw` for look ahead.
`peek_token` was used only by rustdoc syntax coloring. After moving peeking logic into highlighter, I was able to remove `peek_token` from the lexer. I tried to use `iter::Peekable`, but that wasn't as pretty as I hoped, due to buffered fatal errors. So I went with hand-rolled peeking.
After that I've noticed that the only peeking behavior left was for raw tokens to test tt jointness. I've rewritten it in terms of trivia tokens, and not just spans.
After that it became possible to simplify the awkward constructor of the lexer, which could return `Err` if the first peeked token contained error.
Implement another internal lints
cc #49509
This adds ~~two~~ one internal lint~~s~~:
1. LINT_PASS_IMPL_WITHOUT_MACRO: Make sure, that the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass` macro is used to implement lint passes. cc #59669
2. ~~USAGE_OF_TYCTXT_AND_SPAN_ARGS: item 2 on the list in #49509~~
~~With 2. I wasn't sure, if this lint should be applied everywhere. That means a careful review of 0955835 would be great. Also 73fb9b4 allows this lint on some functions. Should I also apply this lint there?~~
TODO (not directly relevant for review):
- [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59316#discussion_r280186517 (not sure yet, if this works or how to query for `rustc_private`, since it's not in [`Features`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/syntax/feature_gate/struct.Features.html) 🤔 cc @eddyb)
- [x] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61735#discussion_r292389870
- [x] Check explicitly for the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass!` macros
r? @oli-obk
Remove io::Result from syntax::print
Since we're now writing directly to the vector, there's no need to
thread results through the whole printing infrastructure
The reader itself doesn't need ability to peek tokens, so it's better
if clients implement this functionality.
This hopefully becomes especially easy once we use iterator interface
for lexer, but this is not too easy at the moment, because of buffered
errors.
rustc: use a separate copy of P for HIR than for AST.
Note: this currently includes/is based on top of #61987.
Like #61968, but goes one step further and uses a separate `P<...>` for the HIR, with no `Clone`, or the ability to mutate after allocation.
There is still `into_inner`/`into_iter`, but they're only exposed for `hir::lowering`, and they would take more work to untangle.
r? @petrochenkov cc @rust-lang/compiler
