use structured suggestion for "missing mut" label
Fixes#54133 for both NLL and non-NLL.
r? @estebank
I'm not super happy with the existing wording here, since it's now a suggestion. I wonder if the message would work better as something like "help: make binding mutable: `mut foo`"?
Also, are the `HELP` and `SUGGESTION` comments necessary?
resolve: Introduce two sub-namespaces in macro namespace
Two sub-namespaces are introduced in the macro namespace - one for bang macros and one for attribute-like macros (attributes, derives).
"Sub-namespace" means this is not a newly introduced full namespace, the single macro namespace is still in place.
I.e. you still can't define/import two macros with the same name in a single module, `use` imports still import only one name in macro namespace (from any sub-namespace) and not possibly two.
However, when we are searching for a name used in a `!` macro call context (`my_macro!()`) we skip attribute names in scope, and when we are searching for a name used in attribute context (`#[my_macro]`/`#[derive(my_macro)]`) we are skipping bang macro names in scope.
In other words, bang macros cannot shadow attribute macros and vice versa.
For a non-macro analogy, we could e.g. skip non-traits when searching for `MyTrait` in `impl MyTrait for Type { ... }`.
However we do not do it in non-macro namespaces because we don't have practical issues with e.g. non-traits shadowing traits with the same name, but with macros we do, especially after macro modularization.
For `#[test]` and `#[bench]` we have a hack in the compiler right now preventing their shadowing by `macro_rules! test` and similar things. This hack was introduced after making `#[test]`/`#[bench]` built-in macros instead of built-in attributes (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53410), something that needed to be done from the start since they are "active" attributes transforming their inputs.
Now they are passed through normal name resolution and can be shadowed, but that's a breaking change, so we have a special hack basically applying this PR for `#[test]` and `#[bench]` only.
Soon all potentially built-in attributes will be passed through normal name resolution (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53913) and that uncovers even more cases where the strict "macro namespace is a single namespace" rule needs to be broken.
For example, with strict rules, built-in macro `cfg!(...)` would shadow built-in attribute `#[cfg]` (they are different things), standard library macro `thread_local!(...)` would shadow built-in attribute `#[thread_local]` - both of these cases are covered by special hacks in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53913 as well.
Crater run uncovered more cases of attributes being shadowed by user-defined macros (`warn`, `doc`, `main`, even `deprecated`), we cannot add exceptions in the compiler for all of them.
Regressions with user-defined attributes like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53583 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53898 also appeared after enabling macro modularization.
People are also usually confused (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53205#issuecomment-411552763, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53583#issuecomment-415447800) when they see conflicts between attributes and non-attribute macros for the first time.
So my proposed solution is to solve this issue by introducing two sub-namespaces and thus skipping resolutions of the wrong kind and preventing more error-causing cases of shadowing.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53583
[NLL] Suggest let binding
Closes#49821
Also adds an alternative to `explain_why_borrow_contains_point` that allows changing error messages based on the reason that will be given. This will also be useful for #51026, #51169 and maybe further changes to does not live long enough messages.
Rollup of 17 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53299 (Updated core/macros.rs to note it works in a no_std environment.)
- #53376 (Cross reference io::copy and fs::copy in docs.)
- #53455 (Individual docs for {from,to}_*_bytes)
- #53550 (librustc_lint: In recursion warning, change 'recurring' to 'recursing')
- #53860 (Migrate (some) of run-pass/ to ui)
- #53874 (Implement Unpin for Box, Rc, and Arc)
- #53895 (tidy: Cleanups and clippy warning fixes)
- #53946 (Clarify `ManuallyDrop` docs)
- #53948 (Minimized clippy test from when NLL disabled two-phase borrows)
- #53959 (Add .git extension to submodule paths missing it)
- #53966 (A few cleanups and minor improvements to mir/dataflow)
- #53967 (propagate build.python into cmake)
- #53979 (Remove `#[repr(transparent)]` from atomics)
- #53991 (Add unchecked_shl/shr check for intrinsics to fix miri's test suit)
- #53992 (migrate run-pass/borrowck to ui/run-pass)
- #53994 (migrate run-pass/*/ to ui/run-pass)
- #54023 (update clippy submodule)
librustc_lint: In recursion warning, change 'recurring' to 'recursing'
The existing wording seems incorrect.
Aside: This warning, 'function cannot return without recursing' is not perfectly clear - it implies that the function _can_ return, it's just got to recurse. But really the fn cannot return period. Clearer wording: 'function recurses infinitely; it cannot return'; or 'function is infinitely self-recursive; it cannot return, and this is probably an error'. I like that.
Various small diagnostic and code clean up
- Point at def span on incorrect `panic` or `oom` function
- Use structured suggestion instead of note for `+=` that can be performed on a dereference of the left binding
- Small code formatting cleanup
Fix#53525 - Unify E0243, E0244, E0087, E0088, E0089, and E0090 into E0107
Fix#53525
This pr merges all errors related to too many or too few generic arguments in types and functions. E0243, E0244, E0087, E0088, E0089, E0090 errors will no longer be emitted and E0107 will be used instead.
Rollup of 17 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53030 (Updated RELEASES.md for 1.29.0)
- #53104 (expand the documentation on the `Unpin` trait)
- #53213 (Stabilize IP associated constants)
- #53296 (When closure with no arguments was expected, suggest wrapping)
- #53329 (Replace usages of ptr::offset with ptr::{add,sub}.)
- #53363 (add individual docs to `core::num::NonZero*`)
- #53370 (Stabilize macro_vis_matcher)
- #53393 (Mark libserialize functions as inline)
- #53405 (restore the page title after escaping out of a search)
- #53452 (Change target triple used to check for lldb in build-manifest)
- #53462 (Document Box::into_raw returns non-null ptr)
- #53465 (Remove LinkMeta struct)
- #53492 (update lld submodule to include RISCV patch)
- #53496 (Fix typos found by codespell.)
- #53521 (syntax: Optimize some literal parsing)
- #53540 (Moved issue-53157.rs into src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/)
- #53551 (Avoid some Place clones.)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
[NLL] Returns are interesting for free regions
Based on #53088 - creating now to get feedback.
Closes#51175
* Make assigning to the return type interesting.
* Use "returning this value" instead of "return" in error messages.
* Prefer one of the explanations that we have a name for to a generic interesting cause in some cases.
* Treat causes that involve the destination of a call like assignments.
