parse_ty() no longer takes a boolean parameter. quote_ty! implementation has not yet been modified accordingly.
As a matter of fact, quote_ty! was not covered by tests. One test (called qquotes) references it, but it has been ignored for nearly one year and now need heavy refactoring.
quote_token.rs seemed like a good place to test quote_ty!, many other quote_*! macros were asserted there.
Rewrite how the HRTB algorithm matches impls against obligations. Instead of impls providing higher-ranked trait-references, impls now once again only have early-bound regions. The skolemization checks are thus moved out into trait matching itself. This allows to implement "perfect forwarding" impls like those described in #19730. This PR builds on a previous PR that was already reviewed by @pnkfelix.
r? @pnkfelix
Fixes#19730
This PR substantially narrows the notion of a "runtime" in Rust, and allows calling into Rust code directly without any setup or teardown.
After this PR, the basic "runtime support" in Rust will consist of:
* Unwinding and backtrace support
* Stack guards
Other support, such as helper threads for timers or the notion of a "current thread" are initialized automatically upon first use.
When using Rust in an embedded context, it should now be possible to call a Rust function directly as a C function with absolutely no setup, though in that case panics will cause the process to abort. In this regard, the C/Rust interface will look much like the C/C++ interface.
In more detail, this PR:
* Merges `librustrt` back into `std::rt`, undoing the facade. While doing so, it removes a substantial amount of redundant functionality (such as mutexes defined in the `rt` module). Code using `librustrt` can now call into `std::rt` to e.g. start executing Rust code with unwinding support.
* Allows all runtime data to be initialized lazily, including the "current thread", the "at_exit" infrastructure, and the "args" storage.
* Deprecates and largely removes `std::task` along with the widespread requirement that there be a "current task" for many APIs in `std`. The entire task infrastructure is replaced with `std::thread`, which provides a more standard API for manipulating and creating native OS threads. In particular, it's possible to join on a created thread, and to get a handle to the currently-running thread. In addition, threads are equipped with some basic blocking support in the form of `park`/`unpark` operations (following a tradition in some OSes as well as the JVM). See the `std::thread` documentation for more details.
* Channels are refactored to use a new internal blocking infrastructure that itself sits on top of `park`/`unpark`.
One important change here is that a Rust program ends when its main thread does, following most threading models. On the other hand, threads will often be created with an RAII-style join handle that will re-institute blocking semantics naturally (and with finer control).
This is very much a:
[breaking-change]
Closes#18000
r? @alexcrichton
This commit is part of a series that introduces a `std::thread` API to
replace `std::task`.
In the new API, `spawn` returns a `JoinGuard`, which by default will
join the spawned thread when dropped. It can also be used to join
explicitly at any time, returning the thread's result. Alternatively,
the spawned thread can be explicitly detached (so no join takes place).
As part of this change, Rust processes now terminate when the main
thread exits, even if other detached threads are still running, moving
Rust closer to standard threading models. This new behavior may break code
that was relying on the previously implicit join-all.
In addition to the above, the new thread API also offers some built-in
support for building blocking abstractions in user space; see the module
doc for details.
Closes#18000
[breaking-change]
This commit merges the `rustrt` crate into `std`, undoing part of the
facade. This merger continues the paring down of the runtime system.
Code relying on the public API of `rustrt` will break; some of this API
is now available through `std::rt`, but is likely to change and/or be
removed very soon.
[breaking-change]
- The following operator traits now take their argument by value: `Neg`, `Not`. This breaks all existing implementations of these traits.
- The unary operation `OP a` now "desugars" to `OpTrait::op_method(a)` and consumes its argument.
[breaking-change]
---
r? @nikomatsakis This PR is very similar to the binops-by-value PR
cc @aturon
followed by a semicolon.
This allows code like `vec![1i, 2, 3].len();` to work.
This breaks code that uses macros as statements without putting
semicolons after them, such as:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b)
assert!(c == d)
println(...);
}
It also breaks code that uses macros as items without semicolons:
local_data_key!(foo)
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
Add semicolons to fix this code. Those two examples can be fixed as
follows:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b);
assert!(c == d);
println(...);
}
local_data_key!(foo);
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
RFC #378.
Closes#18635.
[breaking-change]
---
Rebased version of #18958
r? @alexcrichton
cc @pcwalton
followed by a semicolon.
This allows code like `vec![1i, 2, 3].len();` to work.
This breaks code that uses macros as statements without putting
semicolons after them, such as:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b)
assert!(c == d)
println(...);
}
It also breaks code that uses macros as items without semicolons:
local_data_key!(foo)
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
Add semicolons to fix this code. Those two examples can be fixed as
follows:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b);
assert!(c == d);
println(...);
}
local_data_key!(foo);
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
RFC #378.
Closes#18635.
[breaking-change]
This is to encourage the use of the sugary syntax instead of the `<>` syntax, which will not be usable post-1.0. Rustdoc [still uses the `<>` syntax](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19909), so if a rustdoc wizard is looking for something to do, it would be nice to use the parenthetical syntax there as well. (I tried to patch rustdoc as well, but failed…)
closes#12677 (cc @Valloric)
cc #15294
r? @aturon / @alexcrichton
(Because of #19358 I had to move the struct bounds from the `where` clause into the parameter list)
Normalize late-bound regions in bare functions, stack closures, and traits and include them in the generated hash.
Closes#19791
r? @nikomatsakis (does my normalization make sense?)
cc @alexcrichton
Part of #18469
[breaking-change]
A receiver will only ever get a single auto-reference. Previously arrays and strings would get two, e.g., [T] would be auto-ref'ed to &&[T]. This is usually apparent when a trait is implemented for `&[T]` and has a method takes self by reference. The usual solution is to implement the trait for `[T]` (the DST form).
r? @nikomatsakis (or anyone else, really)
per rfc 459
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19390
One question is: should we start by warning, and only switch to hard error later? I think we discussed something like this in the meeting.
r? @alexcrichton
Part of #18469
[breaking-change]
A receiver will only ever get a single auto-reference. Previously arrays and strings would get two, e.g., [T] would be auto-ref'ed to &&[T]. This is usually apparent when a trait is implemented for `&[T]` and has a method takes self by reference. The usual solution is to implement the trait for `[T]` (the DST form).
- The following operator traits now take their arguments by value: `Add`, `Sub`, `Mul`, `Div`, `Rem`, `BitAnd`, `BitOr`, `BitXor`, `Shl`, `Shr`. This breaks all existing implementations of these traits.
- The binary operation `a OP b` now "desugars" to `OpTrait::op_method(a, b)` and consumes both arguments.
- `String` and `Vec` addition have been changed to reuse the LHS owned value, and to avoid internal cloning. Only the following asymmetric operations are available: `String + &str` and `Vec<T> + &[T]`, which are now a short-hand for the "append" operation.
[breaking-change]
---
This passes `make check` locally. I haven't touch the unary operators in this PR, but converting them to by value should be very similar to this PR. I can work on them after this gets the thumbs up.
@nikomatsakis r? the compiler changes
@aturon r? the library changes. I think the only controversial bit is the semantic change of the `Vec`/`String` `Add` implementation.
cc #19148
This is not technically a [breaking-change], but it will be soon, so
you should update your code. Typically, shadowing is accidental, and
the shadowing lifetime can simply be removed. This frequently occurs
in constructor patterns:
```rust
// Old:
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> { fn new<'a>(..) -> SomeStruct<'a> { ... } }
// Should be:
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> { fn new(..) -> SomeStruct<'a> { ... } }
```
Otherwise, you should rename the inner lifetime to something
else. Note though that lifetime elision frequently applies:
```rust
// Old
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> {
fn get<'a>(x: &'a self) -> &'a T { &self.field }
}
// Should be:
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> {
fn get(x: &self) -> &T { &self.field }
}
``
On AArch64, libc::c_char is u8. There are some places in the code where i8 is assumed, which causes compilation errors.
(AArch64 is not officially supported yet, but this change does not hurt any other targets and makes the code future-proof.)
This is a revival of #19517 (per request of @alexcrichton) now that the new snapshots have landed. We can now remove the last feature gates for if_let, while_let, and tuple_indexing scattered throughout the test sources since these features have been added to Rust.
Closes#19473.
