Miri's pointer_offset_inbounds implementation has been moved into
librustc_mir as ptr_offset_inbounds (to avoid breaking miri on a
nightly update). The comments have been slightly reworked to better
match `offset`'s external documentation about what causes UB.
The intrinsic implementations are taken directly from miri.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Add common lint tools doc
This PR starts adding some documentation about linting tools.
`Retrieving all methods of a type` is not covered at this time.
fixes partially: #3843
changelog: none
option_option test case #4298
Adds regression test case for #4298.
The bug seems still present although rust Playground said otherwise.
changelog: none
new_without_default: do not suggest deriving
---
changelog: do not suggest deriving `Default` in `new_without_default`
This commit changes the behavior of the `new_without_default` lint to not suggest deriving `Default`. This suggestion is misleading if the `new` implementation does something different than what a derived `Default` implementation would do, because then the two methods would not be equivalent.
Instead, the `can_derive_default` check is removed, and we always suggest implementing `Default` in terms of `new()`.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #72153 (exhaustively check `ty::Kind` during structural match checking)
- #72308 (Emit a better diagnostic when function actually has a 'self' parameter)
- #72560 (Enable `glacier` command via triagebot)
- #72567 (Clean up E0608 explanation)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Clarify the documentation of the `unnecessary_mut_passed` lint
fixes#5433 by replacing "giving" with "passing"
changelog: Clarifies documentation for `unnecessary_mut_passed`
Emit a better diagnostic when function actually has a 'self' parameter
Fixes#66898
When we are unable to resolve a reference to `self`, we current assume
that the containing function doesn't have a `self` parameter, and
emit an error message accordingly.
However, if the reference to `self` was created by a macro invocation,
then resolution will correctly fail, due to hygiene. In this case, we
don't want to tell the user that the containing fuction doesn't have a
'self' paramter if it actually has one.
This PR checks for the precense of a 'self' parameter, and adjusts the
error message we emit accordingly.
TODO: The exact error message we emit could probably be improved. Should
we explicitly mention hygiene?
exhaustively check `ty::Kind` during structural match checking
This was prone to errors as we may forget new kinds in the future.
I am also not yet sure about some kinds.
`ty::GeneratorWitness(..) | ty::Infer(_) | ty::Placeholder(_) | ty::UnnormalizedProjection(..) | ty::Bound(..)` might be unreachable here.
We may want to forbid `ty::Projection`, similar to `ty::Param`.
`ty::Opaque` seems fine afaict, should not be possible in a match atm.
I believe `ty::Foreign` should not be structurally match, as I don't even know what
that would actually mean.
r? @pnkfelix cc @eddyb
Shebang handling was too agressive in stripping out the first line in cases where it is actually _not_ a shebang, but instead, valid rust (#70528). This is a second attempt at resolving this issue (the first attempt was flawed, for, among other reasons, causing an ICE in certain cases (#71372, #71471).
The behavior is now codified by a number of UI tests, but simply:
For the first line to be a shebang, the following must all be true:
1. The line must start with `#!`
2. The line must contain a non whitespace character after `#!`
3. The next character in the file, ignoring comments & whitespace must not be `[`
I believe this is a strict superset of what we used to allow, so perhaps a crater run is unnecessary, but probably not a terrible idea.
