Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91668 (Remove the match on `ErrorKind::Other`)
- #91678 (Add tests fixed by #90023)
- #91679 (Move core/stream/stream/mod.rs to core/stream/stream.rs)
- #91681 (fix typo in `intrinsics::raw_eq` docs)
- #91686 (Fix `Vec::reserve_exact` documentation)
- #91697 (Delete Utf8Lossy::from_str)
- #91706 (Add unstable book entries for parts of asm that are not being stabilized)
- #91709 (Replace iterator-based set construction by *Set::From<[T; N]>)
- #91716 (Improve x.py logging and defaults a bit more)
- #91747 (Add pierwill to .mailmap)
- #91755 (Fix since attribute for const_linked_list_new feature)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Replace iterator-based set construction by *Set::From<[T; N]>
This uses the array-based construction for `BtreeSet`s and `HashSet`s instead of first creating an iterator. I could also replace the `let mut a = Set::new(); a.insert(...);` fragments if desired.
Delete Utf8Lossy::from_str
This whole type is marked as being for str internals only, but this constructor is never used by str internals. If you had a &str already and wanted to lossy display it or iterate its lossy utf8 chunks, you would simply not use Utf8Lossy because the whole &str is known to be one contiguous valid utf8 chunk.
If code really does need to obtain a value of type &Utf8Lossy somewhere, and has only a &str, `Utf8Lossy::from_bytes(s.as_bytes())` remains available. As currently implemented, there is no performance penalty relative to `from_str` i.e. the Utf8Lossy does not "remember" that it was constructed using `from_str` to bypass later utf8 decoding.
Fix `Vec::reserve_exact` documentation
The documentation previously said the new capacity cannot overflow `usize`, but in fact it cannot exceed `isize::MAX`.
Update documentation to use `from()` to initialize `HashMap`s and `BTreeMap`s
As of Rust 1.56, `HashMap` and `BTreeMap` both have associated `from()` functions. I think using these in the documentation cleans things up a bit. It allows us to remove some of the `mut`s and avoids the Initialize-Then-Modify anti-pattern.
adjust const_eval_select documentation
"The Rust compiler assumes" indicates that this is language UB, but [I don't think that is a good idea](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/const_eval_select.20assumptions). This UB would be very hard to test for and looks like a way-too-big footgun. ``@oli-obk`` suggested this is meant to be more like "library UB", so I tried to adjust the docs accordingly.
I also removed all references to "referential transparency". That is a rather vague concept used to mean many different things, and I honestly have no idea what exactly is meant by it in this specific instance. But I assume ``@fee1-dead`` had in their mind a property that all `const fn` code upholds, so by demanding that the runtime code and the const-time code are *observably equivalent*, whatever that property is would also be enforced here.
Cc ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval``
Fix incorrect stability attributes
These two instances were caught in #90356, but that PR isn't going to be merged. I've extracted these to ensure it's still correct.
``@rustbot`` label: +A-stability +C-cleanup +S-waiting-on-review
replace vec::Drain drop loops with drop_in_place
The `Drain::drop` implementation came up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82185#issuecomment-789584796 as potentially interfering with other optimization work due its widespread use somewhere in `println!`
`@rustbot` label T-libs-impl
Implement most of RFC 2930, providing the ReadBuf abstraction
This replaces the `Initializer` abstraction for permitting reading into uninitialized buffers, closing #42788.
This leaves several APIs described in the RFC out of scope for the initial implementation:
* read_buf_vectored
* `ReadBufs`
Closes#42788, by removing the relevant APIs.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87599 (Implement concat_bytes!)
- #89999 (Update std::env::temp_dir to use GetTempPath2 on Windows when available.)
- #90796 (Remove the reg_thumb register class for asm! on ARM)
- #91042 (Use Vec extend instead of repeated pushes on several places)
- #91634 (Do not attempt to suggest help for overly malformed struct/function call)
- #91685 (Install llvm tools to sysroot when assembling local toolchain)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Update std::env::temp_dir to use GetTempPath2 on Windows when available.
As a security measure, Windows 11 introduces a new temporary directory API, GetTempPath2.
When the calling process is running as SYSTEM, a separate temporary directory
will be returned inaccessible to non-SYSTEM processes. For non-SYSTEM processes
the behavior will be the same as before.
This can help mitigate against attacks such as this one:
https://medium.com/csis-techblog/cve-2020-1088-yet-another-arbitrary-delete-eop-a00b97d8c3e2
Compatibility risk: Software which relies on temporary files to communicate between SYSTEM and non-SYSTEM
processes may be affected by this change. In many cases, such patterns may be vulnerable to the very
attacks the new API was introduced to harden against.
I'm unclear on the Rust project's tolerance for such change-of-behavior in the standard library. If anything,
this PR is meant to raise awareness of the issue and hopefully start the conversation.
How tested: Taking the example code from the documentation and running it through psexec (from SysInternals) on
Win10 and Win11.
On Win10:
C:\test>psexec -s C:\test\main.exe
<...>
Temporary directory: C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\
On Win11:
C:\test>psexec -s C:\test\main.exe
<...>
Temporary directory: C:\Windows\SystemTemp\
Implement concat_bytes!
This implements the unstable `concat_bytes!` macro, which has tracking issue #87555. It can be used like:
```rust
#![feature(concat_bytes)]
fn main() {
assert_eq!(concat_bytes!(), &[]);
assert_eq!(concat_bytes!(b'A', b"BC", [68, b'E', 70]), b"ABCDEF");
}
```
If strings or characters are used where byte strings or byte characters are required, it suggests adding a `b` prefix. If a number is used outside of an array it suggests arrayifying it. If a boolean is used it suggests replacing it with the numeric value of that number. Doubly nested arrays of bytes are disallowed.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #83744 (Deprecate crate_type and crate_name nested inside #![cfg_attr])
- #90550 (Update certificates in some Ubuntu 16 images.)
- #91272 (Print a suggestion when comparing references to primitive types in `const fn`)
- #91467 (Emphasise that an OsStr[ing] is not necessarily a platform string)
- #91531 (Do not add `;` to expected tokens list when it's wrong)
- #91577 (Address some FIXMEs left over from #91475)
- #91638 (Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_mir_transform`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Emphasise that an OsStr[ing] is not necessarily a platform string
Fixes#53261
Since that issue was filed, #56141 added a further clarification to the `OsString` docs. However the ffi docs may still leave the impression that an `OsStr` is in the platform native form. This PR aims to further emphasise that an `OsStr` is not necessarily a platform string.
Sync portable-simd to remove autosplats
This PR syncs portable-simd in up to a8385522ad in order to address the type inference breakages documented on nightly in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90904 by removing the vector + scalar binary operations (called "autosplats", "broadcasting", or "rank promotion", depending on who you ask) that allow `{scalar} + &'_ {scalar}` to fail in some cases, because it becomes possible the programmer may have meant `{scalar} + &'_ {vector}`.
A few quality-of-life improvements make their way in as well:
- Lane counts can now go to 64, as LLVM seems to have fixed their miscompilation for those.
- `{i,u}8x64` to `__m512i` is now available.
- a bunch of `#[must_use]` notes appear throughout the module.
- Some implementations, mostly instances of `impl core::ops::{Op}<Simd> for Simd` that aren't `{vector} + {vector}` (e.g. `{vector} + &'_ {vector}`), leverage some generics and `where` bounds now to make them easier to understand by reducing a dozen implementations into one (and make it possible for people to open the docs on less burly devices).
- And some internal-only improvements.
None of these changes should affect a beta backport, only actual users of `core::simd` (and most aren't even visible in the programmatic sense), though I can extract an even more minimal changeset for beta if necessary. It seemed simpler to just keep moving forward.
Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact
During developing #91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
`array::IntoIter` has a bunch of really handy logic for dealing with partial arrays, but it's currently hamstrung by only being creatable from a fully-initialized array.
This PR adds two new constructors:
- a safe & const `empty`, since `[].into_iter()` gives `<T, 0>`, not `<T, N>`.
- an unsafe `from_raw_parts`, to allow experimentation with new uses.
(Slice & vec iterators don't need `from_raw_parts` because you `from_raw_parts` the slice or vec instead, but there's no useful way to made a `<[T; N]>::from_raw_parts`, so I think this is a reasonable place to have one.)
Add support for riscv64gc-unknown-freebsd
For https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/target-tier-policy.html#tier-3-target-policy:
* A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
For all Rust targets on FreeBSD, it's [rust@FreeBSD.org](mailto:rust@FreeBSD.org).
* Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
Done.
* Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
Done
* Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
Done.
* The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
Done.
* Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Fine with me.
* The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
Done.
* If the target supports building host tools (such as rustc or cargo), those host tools must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries, other than ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other binaries built for the target. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
Done.
* Targets should not require proprietary (non-FOSS) components to link a functional binary or library.
Done.
* "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
Fine with me.
* Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
Ok.
* This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Ok.
* Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
std is implemented.
* The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Building is possible the same way as other Rust on FreeBSD targets.
* Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
Ok.
* Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Ok.
* Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
Ok.
* In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
Ok.
