rustfix coverage: Skip UI tests with non-json error-format
When using the `rustfix-coverage` flag, some tests currently fail
because they define a different error-format than `json`.
The current implementation crashes when encountering those tests. Since
we don't care about non-json test output when collecting the coverage
data, we handle those tests by returning an empty `Vec` instead.
r? @oli-obk
When using the `rustfix-coverage` flag, some tests currently fail
because they define a different error-format than `json`.
The current implementation crashes when encountering those tests. Since
we don't care about non-json test output when collecting the coverage
data, we handle those tests by returning an empty `Vec` instead.
This commit adds the Armv8-M Baseline and Armv8-M Mainline with
FPU targets in the list of targets that
get their dist components built. It also update the build-manifest
so that this target gets also its dist components uploaded.
manifest: only include miri on the nightly channel
miri needs to build std with xargo, which doesn't allow stable/beta:
<https://github.com/japaric/xargo/pull/204#issuecomment-374888868>
Therefore, at this time there's no point in making miri available on any
but the nightly channel. If we get a stable way to build `std`, like
[RFC 2663], then we can re-evaluate whether to start including miri,
perhaps still as `miri-preview`.
[RFC 2663]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2663
miri needs to build std with xargo, which doesn't allow stable/beta:
<https://github.com/japaric/xargo/pull/204#issuecomment-374888868>
Therefore, at this time there's no point in making miri available on any
but the nightly channel. If we get a stable way to build `std`, like
[RFC 2663], then we can re-evaluate whether to start including miri,
perhaps still as `miri-preview`.
[RFC 2663]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2663
This commit adds a new wasm32-based target distributed through rustup,
supported in the standard library, and implemented in the compiler. The
`wasm32-unknown-wasi` target is intended to be a WebAssembly target
which matches the [WASI proposal recently announced.][LINK]. In summary
the WASI target is an effort to define a standard set of syscalls for
WebAssembly modules, allowing WebAssembly modules to not only be
portable across architectures but also be portable across environments
implementing this standard set of system calls.
The wasi target in libstd is still somewhat bare bones. This PR does not
fill out the filesystem, networking, threads, etc. Instead it only
provides the most basic of integration with the wasi syscalls, enabling
features like:
* `Instant::now` and `SystemTime::now` work
* `env::args` is hooked up
* `env::vars` will look up environment variables
* `println!` will print to standard out
* `process::{exit, abort}` should be hooked up appropriately
None of these APIs can work natively on the `wasm32-unknown-unknown`
target, but with the assumption of the WASI set of syscalls we're able
to provide implementations of these syscalls that engines can implement.
Currently the primary engine implementing wasi is [wasmtime], but more
will surely emerge!
In terms of future development of libstd, I think this is something
we'll probably want to discuss. The purpose of the WASI target is to
provide a standardized set of syscalls, but it's *also* to provide a
standard C sysroot for compiling C/C++ programs. This means it's
intended that functions like `read` and `write` are implemented for this
target with a relatively standard definition and implementation. It's
unclear, therefore, how we want to expose file descriptors and how we'll
want to implement system primitives. For example should `std::fs::File`
have a libc-based file descriptor underneath it? The raw wasi file
descriptor? We'll see! Currently these details are all intentionally
hidden and things we can change over time.
A `WasiFd` sample struct was added to the standard library as part of
this commit, but it's not currently used. It shows how all the wasi
syscalls could be ergonomically bound in Rust, and they offer a possible
implementation of primitives like `std::fs::File` if we bind wasi file
descriptors exactly.
Apart from the standard library, there's also the matter of how this
target is integrated with respect to its C standard library. The
reference sysroot, for example, provides managment of standard unix file
descriptors and also standard APIs like `open` (as opposed to the
relative `openat` inspiration for the wasi ssycalls). Currently the
standard library relies on the C sysroot symbols for operations such as
environment management, process exit, and `read`/`write` of stdio fds.
We want these operations in Rust to be interoperable with C if they're
used in the same process. Put another way, if Rust and C are linked into
the same WebAssembly binary they should work together, but that requires
that the same C standard library is used.
We also, however, want the `wasm32-unknown-wasi` target to be
usable-by-default with the Rust compiler without requiring a separate
toolchain to get downloaded and configured. With that in mind, there's
two modes of operation for the `wasm32-unknown-wasi` target:
1. By default the C standard library is statically provided inside of
`liblibc.rlib` distributed as part of the sysroot. This means that
you can `rustc foo.wasm --target wasm32-unknown-unknown` and you're
good to go, a fully workable wasi binary pops out. This is
incompatible with linking in C code, however, which may be compiled
against a different sysroot than the Rust code was previously
compiled against. In this mode the default of `rust-lld` is used to
link binaries.
2. For linking with C code, the `-C target-feature=-crt-static` flag
needs to be passed. This takes inspiration from the musl target for
this flag, but the idea is that you're no longer using the provided
static C runtime, but rather one will be provided externally. This
flag is intended to also get coupled with an external `clang`
compiler configured with its own sysroot. Therefore you'll typically
use this flag with `-C linker=/path/to/clang-script-wrapper`. Using
this mode the Rust code will continue to reference standard C
symbols, but the definition will be pulled in by the linker configured.
Alright so that's all the current state of this PR. I suspect we'll
definitely want to discuss this before landing of course! This PR is
coupled with libc changes as well which I'll be posting shortly.
[LINK]:
[wasmtime]:
Update rustfmt to 1.2.0
This release includes bug fixes and performance improvements from 1.1.0. Also it adds a new rustfmt tool attribute `#[rustfmt::skip::macros]`, which lets you skip formatting macro calls of your choice.
cc @nrc @Centril @Xanewok
Add a way to track Rustfix UI test coverage
This came out of the first Rustfix WG meeting.
One of the goals is to enable Rustfix tests for all UI tests that
trigger lints with `MachineApplicable` suggestions. In order to do that
we first want to create a tracking issue that lists all files with
missing `// run-rustfix` headers.
This PR adds a `--rustfix-coverage` flag to `./x.py` and compiletest to
list the files with the missing headers in `/tmp/rustfix_missing_coverage.txt`.
From that file we can create the tracking issue and at some point also
enforce the `// run-rustfix` flag on UI tests with `MachineApplicable`
lints.
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #57987 (Fix some AArch64 typos)
- #58581 (Refactor generic parameter encoder functions)
- #58803 (fs::copy() unix: set file mode early)
- #58848 (Prevent cache issues on version updates)
- #59198 (Do not complain about unmentioned fields in recovered patterns)
- #59351 (Include llvm-ar with llvm-tools component)
- #59413 (HirIdify hir::ItemId)
- #59441 (Remove the block on natvis for lld-link.)
- #59448 (Use consistent phrasing for all macro summaries)
- #59456 (Add documentation about `for` used as higher ranked trait bounds)
- #59472 (Document that `std::io::BufReader` discards contents on drop)
- #59474 (Fix link capitalization in documentation of std::io::BufWriter.)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Moves test::black_box to core::hint and fix black_box on wasm32 and asm.js
This changes removes a cyclic dependency between the "test" and "libtest"
crates, where "libtest" depends on "test" for "black_box", but "test" depends on
"libtest" for everything else.
I've chosen the "hint" module because there seems to be enough consensus in the
discussion of RFC2360 that this module is where such an intrinsic would belong,
but this PR does not implement that RFC! If that RFC ever gets merged, the API, docs,
etc. of this API will need to change. This PR just move the implementation of the
already existing API.
For backwards compatibility reasons I've chosen to also keep the "test" feature
gate for these instead of adding a new feature gate. If we change the feature
gate, we'll potentially all benchmarks, and while that's something that we could
do, it seems unnecessary to do that now - if RFC2360 gets merged, we'll need to
do that anyways. Backwards compatibility is also why we continue to re-export
"black_box" from the "test" crate.
This PR also fixes black_box on the wasm32 target, which now supports inline assembly, and uses volatile loads on the asm.js target.
r? @Amanieu (cc @rust-lang/libs)
SGX target: fix std unit tests
This fixes some tests and some code in the SGX sys implementation to make the `std` unit test suite pass.
#59009 must be merged first.
This came out of the first Rustfix WG meeting.
One of the goals is to enable Rustfix tests for all UI tests that
trigger lints with `MachineApplicable` suggestions. In order to do that
we first want to create a tracking issue that lists all files with
missing `// run-rustfix` headers.
This PR adds a `--rustfix-coverage` flag to `./x.py` and compiletest to
list the files with the missing headers in `/tmp/rustfix_missing_coverage.txt`.
From that file we can create the tracking issue and at some point also
enforce the `// run-rustfix` flag on UI tests with `MachineApplicable`
lints.
Refactor tools/build-mainfest
I saw some duplication in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58990 and got an itch... Will likely need to be rebased when that lands. Hopefully the PR should have zero semantic changes...
r? @alexcrichton
Introduce assembly tests suite
The change introduces a new test suite - **Assembly** tests. The motivation behind this is an ability to perform end-to-end codegen testing with LLVM backend. Turned out, NVPTX backend sometimes missing common Rust features (`i128` and libcalls in the past, and still full atomics support) due to different reasons.
Prior to this change, basic NVPTX assembly tests were implemented within `run-make` suite. Now, it's easier to write additional and maintain existing tests for the target.
cc @gnzlbg @peterhj
cc @eddyb I adjusted mangling scheme expectation, so there is no need to change the tests for #57967
Track embedded-book in the toolstate
The embedded book was tested in the tools job but the test result was never published. This PR adds maintainer information of embedded-book. This PR also requires the next update to embedded-book to pass the all tests, currently its state is test-fail.
rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate#10 should be merged before this PR.
Filter ui revision tests
Updates UI test output filtering to also filter away test annotations for revisions:
Previously filtered: //~ ERROR [XXXX]
Now also filters: //[revision]~ ERROR [XXXX]
I reckon, if we have the one, we should have the other for consistency, its lack was probably an oversight (the existence of revision testing is not really well documented...)
