Specifically, the method parameter cardinality mismatch or missing
method error message span now gets method itself exactly. It was the
whole expression.
Closes#9390Closes#13684Closes#13709
This patch removes the special auto-rooting for `@` from the borrow checker. With `@` moving into a library, it doesn't make sense to keep this code around anymore. It also simplifies `trans` by removing root checking from there
@nikomatsakis
Closes: #11586
Specifically, the method parameter cardinality mismatch or missing
method error message span now gets method itself exactly. It was the
whole expression.
Closes#9390Closes#13684Closes#13709
This allows the use of syntax extensions when cross-compiling (fixing #12102). It does this by encoding the target triple in the crate metadata and checking it when searching for files. Currently the crate triple must match the host triple when there is a macro_registrar_fn, it must match the target triple when linking, and can match either when only macro_rules! macros are used.
due to carelessness, this is pretty much a duplicate of https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/13450.
This adds the target triple to the crate metadata.
When searching for a crate the phase (link, syntax) is taken into account.
During link phase only crates matching the target triple are considered.
During syntax phase, either the target or host triple will be accepted, unless
the crate defines a macro_registrar, in which case only the host triple will
match.
This alters the borrow checker's requirements on invoking closures from
requiring an immutable borrow to requiring a unique immutable borrow. This means
that it is illegal to invoke a closure through a `&` pointer because there is no
guarantee that is not aliased. This does not mean that a closure is required to
be in a mutable location, but rather a location which can be proven to be
unique (often through a mutable pointer).
For example, the following code is unsound and is no longer allowed:
type Fn<'a> = ||:'a;
fn call(f: |Fn|) {
f(|| {
f(|| {})
});
}
fn main() {
call(|a| {
a();
});
}
There is no replacement for this pattern. For all closures which are stored in
structures, it was previously allowed to invoke the closure through `&self` but
it now requires invocation through `&mut self`.
The standard library has a good number of violations of this new rule, but the
fixes will be separated into multiple breaking change commits.
Closes#12224
This alters the borrow checker's requirements on invoking closures from
requiring an immutable borrow to requiring a unique immutable borrow. This means
that it is illegal to invoke a closure through a `&` pointer because there is no
guarantee that is not aliased. This does not mean that a closure is required to
be in a mutable location, but rather a location which can be proven to be
unique (often through a mutable pointer).
For example, the following code is unsound and is no longer allowed:
type Fn<'a> = ||:'a;
fn call(f: |Fn|) {
f(|| {
f(|| {})
});
}
fn main() {
call(|a| {
a();
});
}
There is no replacement for this pattern. For all closures which are stored in
structures, it was previously allowed to invoke the closure through `&self` but
it now requires invocation through `&mut self`.
The standard library has a good number of violations of this new rule, but the
fixes will be separated into multiple breaking change commits.
Closes#12224
[breaking-change]
When reporting "consider removing this semicolon" hint message, the
offending semicolon may come from macro call site instead of macro
itself. Using the more appropriate span makes the hint more helpful.
Closes#13428.
This gives a better NOTE error message when a privacy error is encountered with
a static method. Previously no note was emitted (due to lack of support), but
now a note is emitted indicating that the struct/enum itself is private.
Closes#13641
This gives a better NOTE error message when a privacy error is encountered with
a static method. Previously no note was emitted (due to lack of support), but
now a note is emitted indicating that the struct/enum itself is private.
Closes#13641
When reporting "consider removing this semicolon" hint message, the
offending semicolon may come from macro call site instead of macro
itself. Using the more appropriate span makes the hint more helpful.
Closes#13428.
This commit changes the way move errors are reported when some value is
captured by a PatIdent. First, we collect all of the "cannot move out
of" errors before reporting them, and those errors with the same "move
source" are reported together. If the move is caused by a PatIdent (that
binds by value), we add a note indicating where it is and suggest the
user to put `ref` if they don't want the value to move. This makes the
"cannot move out of" error in match expression nicer (though the extra
note may not feel that helpful in other places :P). For example, with
the following code snippet,
```rust
enum Foo {
Foo1(~u32, ~u32),
Foo2(~u32),
Foo3,
}
fn main() {
let f = &Foo1(~1u32, ~2u32);
match *f {
Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
Foo2(num) => (),
Foo3 => ()
}
}
```
Errors before the change:
```rust
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:11:9: 11:18 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~~~~~~~
```
After:
```rust
test.rs:9:11: 9:13 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:9 match *f {
^~
test.rs:10:14: 10:18 note: attempting to move value to here (to prevent the move, use `ref num1` or `ref mut num1` to capture value by reference)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:10:20: 10:24 note: and here (use `ref num2` or `ref mut num2`)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:11:14: 11:17 note: and here (use `ref num` or `ref mut num`)
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~
```
Close#8064
This removes the `priv` keyword from the language and removes private enum
variants as a result. The remaining use cases of private enum variants were all
updated to be a struct with one private field that is a private enum.
RFC: 0006-remove-priv
Closes#13535
This includes a change to the way lifetime names are generated. Say we
figure that `[#0, 'a, 'b]` have to be the same lifetimes, then instead
of just generating a new lifetime `'c` like before to replace them, we
would reuse `'a`. This is done so that when the lifetime name comes
from an impl, we don't give something that's completely off, and we
don't have to do much work to figure out where the name came from. For
example, for the following code snippet:
```rust
struct Baz<'x> {
bar: &'x int
}
impl<'x> Baz<'x> {
fn baz1(&self) -> &int {
self.bar
}
}
```
`[#1, 'x]` (where `#1` is BrAnon(1) and refers to lifetime of `&int`)
have to be marked the same lifetime. With the old method, we would
generate a new lifetime `'a` and suggest `fn baz1(&self) -> &'a int`
or `fn baz1<'a>(&self) -> &'a int`, both of which are wrong.
A mismatched type with more type parameters than the expected one causes
`typeck` looking up out of the bound of type parameter vector, which
leads to ICE.
Closes#13466
A mismatched type with more type parameters than the expected one causes
`typeck` looking up out of the bound of type parameter vector, which
leads to ICE.
Closes#13466
Previously, a private use statement would shadow a public use statement, all of
a sudden publicly exporting the privately used item. The correct behavior here
is to only shadow the use for the module in question, but for now it just
reverts the entire name to private so the pub use doesn't have much effect.
The behavior isn't exactly what we want, but this no longer has backwards
compatibility hazards.
Previously resolve was checking the "import resolution" for whether an import
had succeeded or not, but this was the same structure filled in by a previous
import if a name is shadowed. Instead, this alters resolve to consult the local
resolve state (as opposed to the shared one) to test whether an import succeeded
or not.
Closes#13404
Resolve is currently erroneously allowing imports through private `use`
statements in some circumstances, even across module boundaries. For example,
this code compiles successfully today:
use std::c_str;
mod test {
use c_str::CString;
}
This should not be allowed because it was explicitly decided that private `use`
statements are purely bringing local names into scope, they are not
participating further in name resolution.
As a consequence of this patch, this code, while valid today, is now invalid:
mod test {
use std::c_str;
unsafe fn foo() {
::test::c_str::CString::new(0 as *u8, false);
}
}
While plausibly acceptable, I found it to be more consistent if private imports
were only considered candidates to resolve the first component in a path, and no
others.
Closes#12612
I think that the test case from this issue has become out of date with resolve
changes in the past 9 months, and it's not entirely clear to me what the
original bug was.
Regardless, it seems like tricky resolve behavior, so tests were added to make
sure things resolved correctly and warnings were correctly reported.
Closes#7663
This commit changes the way move errors are reported when some value is
captured by a PatIdent. First, we collect all of the "cannot move out
of" errors before reporting them, and those errors with the same "move
source" are reported together. If the move is caused by a PatIdent (that
binds by value), we add a note indicating where it is and suggest the
user to put `ref` if they don't want the value to move. This makes the
"cannot move out of" error in match expression nicer (though the extra
note may not feel that helpful in other places :P). For example, with
the following code snippet,
```rust
enum Foo {
Foo1(~u32, ~u32),
Foo2(~u32),
Foo3,
}
fn main() {
let f = &Foo1(~1u32, ~2u32);
match *f {
Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
Foo2(num) => (),
Foo3 => ()
}
}
```
Errors before the change:
```rust
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:11:9: 11:18 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~~~~~~~
```
After:
```rust
test.rs:9:11: 9:13 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:9 match *f {
^~
test.rs:10:14: 10:18 note: attempting to move value to here (to prevent the move, you can use `ref num1` to capture value by reference)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:10:20: 10:24 note: and here (use `ref num2`)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:11:14: 11:17 note: and here (use `ref num`)
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~
```
Close#8064
