This PR adds a suggestion to replace an inexisting field for an
unmentioned field. Given the following code:
```rust
enum Foo {
Bar { alpha: u8, bravo: u8, charlie: u8 },
}
fn foo(foo: Foo) {
match foo {
Foo::Bar {
alpha,
beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here.
charlie,
} => todo!(),
}
}
```
the compiler now emits the error messages below.
```text
error[E0026]: variant `Foo::Bar` does not have a field named `beta`
--> src/lib.rs:9:13
|
9 | beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here.
| ^^^^
| |
| variant `Foo::Bar` does not have this field
| help: `Foo::Bar` has a field named `bravo`: `bravo`
```
Note that this suggestion is available iff the number of inexisting
fields and unmentioned fields are both 1.
For two reasons:
1. Now that the suggestion span has been corrected, the output is a bit
cluttered and hard to read. Putting the suggestion its own window
creates more space.
2. It's easier to see what's being suggested, since now the version
after the suggestion is applied is shown.
(And same for tuple variants.)
Previously, the span was just for the constructor name, which meant it
would result in syntactically-invalid code when applied. Now, the span
is for the entire expression.
* On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format
* When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline
* Color highlight modified span
And tuple variant syntax, but that didn't fit in the subject :)
Now the fact that these are suggestions is exposed both to the layout
engine and to IDEs and rustfix for automatic application.
re https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72380#discussion_r438289385
Given the toy code
```rust
fn is_positive(n: usize) {
n > -1_isize;
}
```
We currently get a type mismatch error like the following:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:2:9
|
2 | n > -1_isize;
| ^^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found `isize`
|
help: you can convert an `isize` to `usize` and panic if the converted value wouldn't fit
|
2 | n > (-1_isize).try_into().unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
But clearly, `-1` can never fit into a `usize`, so the suggestion will
always panic. A more useful message would tell the user that the value
can never fit in the expected type:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> test.rs:2:9
|
2 | n > -1_isize;
| ^^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found `isize`
|
note: `-1_isize` can never fit into `usize`
--> test.rs:2:9
|
2 | n > -1_isize;
| ^^^^^^^^
```
Which is what this commit implements.
I only added this check for negative literals because
- Currently we can only perform such a check for literals (constant
value propagation is outside the scope of the typechecker at this
point)
- A lint error for out-of-range numeric literals is already emitted
IMO it makes more sense to put this check in librustc_lint, but as far
as I can tell the typecheck pass happens before the lint pass, so I've
added it here.
r? @estebank
Given a code
```rust
fn foo(x: u8, y: u32) -> bool {
x > y
}
fn main() {}
```
it could be more helpful to provide a suggestion to do "u32::from(x)"
rather than "y.try_into().unwrap()", since the latter may panic.
We do this by passing the LHS of a binary expression up the stack into
the coercion checker.
Closes#73145
