Unsized tuple coercions
Part of #18469. Fixes#32702.
#37685 and #34451 might also be related.
This PR does the following:
- Introduce explicit `Sized` constraints on tuple initializers, similar to that of record-struct initializers. Not much relevant to the main contribution but I noticed this when making tests for unsized tuple coercions.
- Implement `(.., T): Unsize<(.., U)>` where `T: Unsize<U>`.
- Assume `(.., T)` is MaybeUnsizedUnivariant.
- Modify `src/librustc/ty/util.rs` and `src/librustc_trans/glue.rs` so that tuples and structs are uniformly traversed when translating.
std: Fix implementation of `Alloc::alloc_one`
This had an accidental `u8 as *mut T` where it was intended to have just a
normal pointer-to-pointer cast.
Closes#42827
add `allow_fail` test attribute
This change allows the user to add an `#[allow_fail]` attribute to
tests that will cause the test to compile & run, but if the test fails
it will not cause the entire test run to fail. The test output will
show the failure, but in yellow instead of red, and also indicate that
it was an allowed failure.
Here is an example of the output: http://imgur.com/a/wt7ga
Detect missing `;` on methods with return type `()`
- Point out the origin of a type requirement when it is the return type
of a method
- Point out possibly missing semicolon when the return type is `()` and
the implicit return makes sense as a statement
- Suggest changing the return type of methods with default return type
- Don't suggest changing the return type on `fn main()`
- Don't suggest changing the return type on impl fn
- Suggest removal of semicolon (instead of being help)
re-add the call to `super_statement` in EraseRegions
The move gathering code is sensitive to type-equality - that is rather
un-robust and I plan to fix it eventually, but that's a more invasive
change. And we want to fix the visitor anyway.
Fixes#42903.
r? @eddyb
The move gathering code is sensitive to type-equality - that is rather
un-robust and I plan to fix it eventually, but that's a more invasive
change. And we want to fix the visitor anyway.
Fixes#42903.
only set "overruled by outer forbid" once for lint groups, by group name
Previously, conflicting forbid/allow attributes for a lint group would
result in a separate "allow(L) overruled by outer forbid(L)" error for
every lint L in the group. This was needlessly and annoyingly verbose;
we prefer to just have one error pointing out the conflicting
attributes.
(Also, while we're touching context.rs, clean up some unused arguments.)
Resolves#42873.
