Reduce maximum repr(align(N)) to 2^29
The current maximum `repr(align(N))` alignment is larger than the maximum alignment accepted by LLVM, which can cause issues for huge values of `N`, as seen in #49492. Fixes#49492.
r? @rkruppe
Fix an unresolved import issue with enabled `use_extern_macros`
This is a kinda ugly special-purpose solution that will break if we suddenly add a fourth namespace, but I hope to come up with something more general if I get to import resolution refactoring this summer.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50187 thus removing a blocker for stabilization of `use_extern_macros`
Correct initial field alignment for repr(C)/repr(int)
Fixes#50098 following https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50098#issuecomment-385497333.
(I wasn't sure which kind of test was best suited here — I picked run-pass simply because that was convenient, but if codegen is more appropriate, let me know and I'll change it.)
r? @eddyb
Treat generators as if they have an arbitrary destructor
Conservatively assume dropping a generator touches its upvars, via locals' destructors.
Fix#49918
Module experiments: Add one more prelude layer for extern crate names passed with `--extern`
Implements one item from https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/the-great-module-adventure-continues/6678/183
When some name is looked up in lexical scope (`name`, i.e. not module-relative scope `some_mod::name` or `::name`), it's searched roughly in the next order:
- local variables
- items in unnamed blocks
- items in the current module
- ✨ NEW! ✨ crate names passed with `--extern` ("extern prelude")
- standard library prelude (`Vec`, `drop`)
- language prelude (built-in types like `u8`, `str`, etc)
The last two layers contain a limited set of names controlled by us and not arbitrary user-defined names like upper layers. We want to be able to add new names into these two layers without breaking user code, so "extern prelude" names have higher priority than std prelude and built-in types.
This is a one-time breaking change, that's why it would be nice to run this through crater.
Practical impact is expected to be minimal though due to stylistic reasons (there are not many `Uppercase` crates) and due to the way how primitive types are resolved (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32131).
This reworks the force-frame-pointer PR to explicitly only consider the
value of the flag if it is provided, and use a target default otherwise.
Something that was tried but not kept was renaming the flag to
`frame-pointer`, because for flag `frame-pointer=no`, there is no
guarante, that LLVM will elide *all* the frame pointers; oposite of what
the literal reading of the flag would suggest.
We apparently used to generate bad/incomplete debug info causing
debuggers not to find symbols of stack allocated variables. This was
somehow worked around by having frame pointers.
With the current codegen, this seems no longer necessary, so we can
remove the code that force-enables frame pointers whenever debug info
is requested.
Since certain situations, like profiling code profit from having frame
pointers, we add a -Cforce-frame-pointers flag to always enable frame
pointers.
Fixes#11906
check that #[used] is used only on statics
this attribute has no effect on other items. This makes the implementation match what's described in the RFC.
cc #40289
r? @nagisa
Make `Vec::new` a `const fn`
`RawVec::empty/_in` are a hack. They're there because `if size_of::<T> == 0 { !0 } else { 0 }` is not allowed in `const` yet. However, because `RawVec` is unstable, the `empty/empty_in` constructors can be removed when #49146 is done...
