- Use `syntax::util::parser::expr_precedence` to determine wether
parenthesis are needed around the casting target.
- Update message to not incorrectly mention rounding on `.into()`
suggestions, as those types that do have that implemented will never
round.
When a ui-fulldeps comparison fails it suggests running
update-references.sh:
```
src/test/ui-fulldeps/update-references.sh 'rust/build/x86_64-apple-darwin/test/ui-fulldeps' 'resolve-error.rs'
```
This does not work as update-references.sh isn't executable. The other
update-references.sh in the ui directory is already executable so this looks
like an oversight.
Properly parse impls for the never type `!`
Recover from missing `for` in `impl Trait for Type`
Prohibit inherent default impls and default impls of auto traits
Change wording in more diagnostics to use "auto traits"
Some minor code cleanups in the parser
Use correct line offsets for doctests
Not yet tested.
This doesn't handle char positions. It could if I collected a map of char offsets and lines, but this is a bit more work and requires hooking into the parser much more (unsure if it's possible).
r? @QuietMisdreavus
(fixes#45868)
rustc: Tweak `#[target_feature]` syntax
This is an implementation of the `#[target_feature]` syntax-related changes of
[RFC 2045][rfc]. Notably two changes have been implemented:
* The new syntax is `#[target_feature(enable = "..")]` instead of
`#[target_feature = "+.."]`. The `enable` key is necessary instead of the `+`
to indicate that a feature is being enabled, and a sub-list is used for
possible expansion in the future. Additionally within this syntax the feature
names being enabled are now whitelisted against a known set of target feature
names that we know about.
* The `#[target_feature]` attribute can only be applied to unsafe functions. It
was decided in the RFC that invoking an instruction possibly not defined for
the current processor is undefined behavior, so to enable this feature for now
it requires an `unsafe` intervention.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2045-target-feature.md
the match-checking code used to use TyErr for signaling "unknown,
inhabited" types for a long time. It had been switched to using the
exact type in #38069, to handle uninhabited types.
However, in #39980, we discovered that we still needed the "unknown
inhabited" logic, but I used `()` instead of `TyErr` to handle that.
Revert to using `TyErr` to fix that problem.
This is an implementation of the `#[target_feature]` syntax-related changes of
[RFC 2045][rfc]. Notably two changes have been implemented:
* The new syntax is `#[target_feature(enable = "..")]` instead of
`#[target_feature = "+.."]`. The `enable` key is necessary instead of the `+`
to indicate that a feature is being enabled, and a sub-list is used for
possible expansion in the future. Additionally within this syntax the feature
names being enabled are now whitelisted against a known set of target feature
names that we know about.
* The `#[target_feature]` attribute can only be applied to unsafe functions. It
was decided in the RFC that invoking an instruction possibly not defined for
the current processor is undefined behavior, so to enable this feature for now
it requires an `unsafe` intervention.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2045-target-feature.md
No longer parse it.
Remove AutoTrait variant from AST and HIR.
Remove backwards compatibility lint.
Remove coherence checks, they make no sense for the new syntax.
Remove from rustdoc.
Remove deprecated unstable attribute #[simd]
The `#[simd]` attribute has been deprecated since c8b6d5b23c back in 2015. Any nightly crates using it have had ample time to switch to `#[repr(simd)]`, and if they didn't they're likely broken by now anyway.
r? @eddyb
`struct` pattern parsing and diagnostic tweaks
- Recover from struct parse error on match and point out missing match
body.
- Point at struct when finding non-identifier while parsing its fields.
- Add label to "expected identifier, found {}" error.
Fix#15980.
type error method suggestions use whitelisted identity-like conversions
Previously, on a type mismatch (and if this wasn't preëmpted by a
higher-priority suggestion), we would look for argumentless methods
returning the expected type, and list them in a `help` note. This had two
major shortcomings: firstly, a lot of the suggestions didn't really make
sense (if you used a &str where a String was expected,
`.to_ascii_uppercase()` is probably not the solution you were hoping
for). Secondly, we weren't generating suggestions from the most useful
traits! We address the first problem with an internal
`#[rustc_conversion_suggestion]` attribute meant to mark methods that keep
the "same value" in the relevant sense, just converting the type. We
address the second problem by making `FnCtxt.probe_for_return_type` pass
the `ProbeScope::AllTraits` to `probe_op`: this would seem to be safe
because grep reveals no other callers of `probe_for_return_type`.
Also, structured suggestions are pretty and good for RLS and friends.
Unfortunately, the trait probing is still not all one would hope for: at a
minimum, we don't know how to rule out `into()` in cases where it wouldn't
actually work, and we don't know how to rule in `.to_owned()` where it
would. Issues #46459 and #46460 have been filed and are ref'd in a FIXME.
This is hoped to resolve#42929, #44672, and #45777.
Treat #[path] files as mod.rs files
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46936, cc @briansmith, @SergioBenitez, @nikomatsakis.
This (insta-stable) change treats files included via `#[path = "bla.rs"] mod foo;` as though they were `mod.rs` files. Namely, it allows them to include `mod` statements and looks for the child modules in sibling directories, rather than in relative `modname/childmodule.rs` files as happens for non-`mod.rs` files.
This change makes the `non_modrs_mods` feature backwards compatible with the existing usage in https://github.com/briansmith/ring, several versions of which are currently broken in beta. If we decide to merge, this change should be backported to beta.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37872
r? @jseyfried
Skip linker-output-non-utf8 test on Apple
This test fails on APFS filesystems with the following error:
```shell
mkdir: /Users/ryan/Code/rust/build/x86_64-apple-darwin/test/run-make/linker-output-non-utf8.stage2-x86_64-apple-darwin/zzz�: Illegal byte sequence
```
The mkdir does succeed on an HFS+ volume mounted on the same system:
```shell
$ mkdir zzz$$'\xff'
$ ls
zzz47432\xff
```
This is due to APFS now requiring that all paths are valid UTF-8. As APFS will be the default filesystem for all new Darwin-based systems the most straightforward fix is to skip this test on Darwin as well as Windows.
macros: improve 1.0/2.0 interaction
This PR supports using unhygienic macros from hygienic macros without breaking the latter's hygiene.
```rust
// crate A:
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! m1 { () => {
f(); // unhygienic: this macro needs `f` in its environment
fn g() {} // (1) unhygienic: `g` is usable outside the macro definition
} }
// crate B:
#![feature(decl_macro)]
extern crate A;
use A::m1;
macro m2() {
fn f() {} // (2)
m1!(); // After this PR, `f()` in the expansion resolves to (2), not (3)
g(); // After this PR, this resolves to `fn g() {}` from the above expansion.
// Today, it is a resolution error.
}
fn test() {
fn f() {} // (3)
m2!(); // Today, `m2!()` can see (3) even though it should be hygienic.
fn g() {} // Today, this conflicts with `fn g() {}` from the expansion, even though it should be hygienic.
}
```
Once this PR lands, you can make an existing unhygienic macro hygienic by wrapping it in a hygienic macro. There is an [example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46551/commits/b766fa887dc0e4b923a38751fe4d570e35a75710) of this in the tests.
r? @nrc
These impls are useful when working with combinator
methods that expect an option or a result, but you
have a Result<Option<T>, E> instead of an Option<Result<T, E>>
or vice versa.
