atomic_load intrinsic: use const generic parameter for ordering
We have a gazillion intrinsics for the atomics because we encode the ordering into the intrinsic name rather than making it a parameter. This is particularly bad for those operations that take two orderings. Let's fix that!
This PR only converts `load`, to see if there's any feedback that would fundamentally change the strategy we pursue for the const generic intrinsics.
The first two commits are preparation and could be a separate PR if you prefer.
`@BoxyUwU` -- I hope this is a use of const generics that is unlikely to explode? All we need is a const generic of enum type. We could funnel it through an integer if we had to but an enum is obviously nicer...
`@bjorn3` it seems like the cranelift backend entirely ignores the ordering?
Report text_direction_codepoint_in_literal when parsing
The lint is now reported in code that gets removed/modified/duplicated by macro expansion, and spans are more accurate so we don't get ICEs from trying to split a span in the middle of a character.
This removes support for lint level attributes for `text_direction_codepoint_in_literal` except at the crate level, I don't think that there's an easy way around this when the lint can be reported on code that's removed by `cfg` or that is only in the input of a macro.
Fixes#140281
Add eslint as part of `tidy` run
Rustdoc uses `eslint` to run lints on the JS files. Currently you need to run it by hand since it's not part of any `x.py` command. This PR makes it part of `test tidy`. However, to prevent having all rust developers to install `npm` and `eslint`, I made it optional: if `eslint` is not installed, then the check is simply skipped (but will tell that it is being skipped).
The second commit removes the manual checks from the docker file since `eslint` is run as part of tidy.
cc `@lolbinarycat,` [#t-rustdoc > eslint seems to only be run in CI](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/eslint.20seems.20to.20only.20be.20run.20in.20CI/with/520761477)
Stabilize `repr128`
## Stabilisation report
The `repr128` feature ([tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56071)) allows the use of `#[repr(u128)]` and `#[repr(i128)]` on enums in the same way that other primitive representations such as `#[repr(u64)]` can be used. For example:
```rust
#[repr(u128)]
enum Foo {
One = 1,
Two,
Big = u128::MAX,
}
#[repr(i128)]
enum Bar {
HasThing(u16) = 42,
HasSomethingElse(i64) = u64::MAX as i128 + 1,
HasNothing,
}
```
This is the final part of adding 128-bit integers to Rust ([RFC 1504](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1504-int128.html)); all other parts of 128-bit integer support were stabilised in #49101 back in 2018.
From a design perspective, `#[repr(u128)]`/`#[repr(i128)]` function like `#[repr(u64)]`/`#[repr(i64)]` but for 128-bit integers instead of 64-bit integers. The only differences are:
- FFI safety: as `u128`/`i128` are not currently considered FFI safe, neither are `#[repr(u128)]`/`#[repr(i128)]` enums (I discovered this wasn't the case while drafting this stabilisation report, so I have submitted #138282 to fix this).
- Debug info: while none of the major debuggers currently support 128-bit integers, as of LLVM 20 `rustc` will emit valid debuginfo for both DWARF and PDB (PDB makes use of the same natvis that is also used for all enums with fields, whereas DWARF has native support).
Tests for `#[repr(u128)]`/`#[repr(i128)]` enums include:
- [ui/enum-discriminant/repr128.rs](385970f0c1/tests/ui/enum-discriminant/repr128.rs): checks that 128-bit enum discriminants have the correct values.
- [debuginfo/msvc-pretty-enums.rs](385970f0c1/tests/debuginfo/msvc-pretty-enums.rs): checks the PDB debuginfo is correct.
- [run-make/repr128-dwarf](385970f0c1/tests/run-make/repr128-dwarf/rmake.rs): checks the DWARF debuginfo is correct.
Stabilising this feature does not require any changes to the Rust Reference as [the documentation on primitive representations](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/type-layout.html#r-layout.repr.primitive.intro) already includes `u128` and `i128`.
Closes#56071
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues/1368
r? lang
```@rustbot``` label +I-lang-nominated +T-lang
Reorder `ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union}` fields.
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
<-><----> <------------>
/ | \
ident generics variant_data
```
r? `@fee1-dead`
This does not fully fix things, but it introduces a function that can be used to fix occurences.
When using `to_def` functionality, the input node needs to come from the macro expanded include, not the real file that was included.
This does unfortunately add more caller burden, but there is not really a way around it.
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
<-><----> <------------>
/ | \
ident generics variant_data
```
`concat_idents!` was deprecated in [1] and will be removed in the near
future. rust-analyzer's support is independent of rustc's, so drop RA
support now to make syncing easier.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653
Add some track_caller info to precondition panics
Currently, when you encounter a precondition check, you'll always get the caller location of the implementation of the precondition checks. But with this PR, you'll be told the location of the invalid call. Which is useful.
I thought of this while looking at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129642#issuecomment-2311703898.
The changes to `tests/ui/const*` happen because the const-eval interpreter skips `#[track_caller]` frames in its backtraces.
The perf implications of this are:
* Increased debug binary sizes. The caller_location implementation requires that the additional data we want to display here be stored in const allocations, which are deduplicated but not across crates. There is no impact on optimized build sizes. The panic path and the caller location data get optimized out.
* The compile time hit to opt-incr-patched bitmaps happens because the patch changes the line number of some function calls with precondition checks, causing us to go from 0 dirty CGUs to 1 dirty CGU.
* The other compile time hits are marginal but real, and due to doing a handful of new queries. Adding more useful data isn't completely free.
Rename `{GenericArg,Term}::unpack()` to `kind()`
A well-deserved rename IMO.
r? `@oli-obk` or `@lcnr` (or anyone)
cc `@rust-lang/types,` but I'd be surprised if this is controversial.
interpret: add allocation parameters to `AllocBytes`
Necessary for a better implementation of [rust-lang/miri#4343](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/4343). Also included here is the code from that PR, adapted to this new interface for the sake of example and so that CI can run on them; the Miri changes can be reverted and merged separately, though.
r? `@RalfJung`
Properly analyze captures from unsafe binders
We need to represent the unsafe binder unwrap as an adjustment in HIR. Pretty straightforward b/c we already represent it as a projection elem in MIR.
Fixes#141418Fixes#141417
r? oli-obk
interpret: do not force_allocate all return places
A while ago I cleaned up our `PlaceTy` a little, but as a side-effect of that, return places had to always be force-allocated. That turns out to cause quite a few extra allocations, and for a project we are doing where we marry Miri with a model checker, that means a lot of extra work -- local variables are just so much easier to reason about than allocations.
So, this PR brings back the ability to have the return place be just a local of the caller. To make this work cleanly I had to rework stack pop handling a bit, which also changes the output of Miri in some cases as the span for errors occurring during a particular phase of stack pop changed.
With these changes, a no-std binary with a function of functions that just take and return scalar types and that uses no pointers now does not move *any* local variables into memory. :)
r? `@oli-obk`
