- Check privacy sanity in all blocks, not only function bodies
- Check all fields, not only named
- Check all impl items, not only methods
- Check default impls
- Move the sanity check in the beginning of privacy checking, so others could rely on it
Technically it's a [breaking-change], but I expect no breakage because, well, it's *sane* privacy visitor, if code is broken it must be insane by definition!
Quite a bit of cruft in the valgrind suppressions. I started from a clean slate and found a few unique failures; this commit also moves the tests "fixed" by these suppressions into run-pass-valgrind.
This commit replaces the in-tree liblibc with the [external clone](https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/libc) which has no evolved beyond the in-tree version in light of its [recent redesign](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1291).
The primary changes here are:
* `src/liblibc/lib.rs` was deleted
* `src/liblibc` is now a submodule pointing at the external repository
* `src/libstd/sys/unix/{c.rs,sync.rs}` were both deleted having all bindings folded into the external liblibc.
* Many ad-hoc `extern` blocks in the standard library were removed in favor of bindings now being in the external liblibc.
* Many functions/types were added to `src/libstd/sys/windows/c.rs`, and the scattered definitions throughout the standard library were consolidated here.
At the API level this commit is **not a breaking change**, although it is only very lightly tested on the *BSD variants and is probably going to break almost all of their builds! Follow-up commits to liblibc should in theory be all that's necessary to get the build working on the *BSDs again.
* Delete `sys::unix::{c, sync}` as these are now all folded into libc itself
* Update all references to use `libc` as a result.
* Update all references to the new flat namespace.
* Moves all windows bindings into sys::c
* Store the native representation directly in the `ExitStatus` structure instead
of a "parsed version" (mostly for Unix).
* On Windows, be more robust against processes exiting with the status of 259.
Unfortunately this exit code corresponds to `STILL_ACTIVE`, causing libstd to
think the process was still alive, causing an infinite loop. Instead the loop
is removed altogether and `WaitForSingleObject` is used to wait for the
process to exit.
* Store the native representation directly in the `ExitStatus` structure instead
of a "parsed version" (mostly for Unix).
* On Windows, be more robust against processes exiting with the status of 259.
Unfortunately this exit code corresponds to `STILL_ACTIVE`, causing libstd to
think the process was still alive, causing an infinite loop. Instead the loop
is removed altogether and `WaitForSingleObject` is used to wait for the
process to exit.
Handle them in `middle::reachable` instead (no optimizations so far, just drop all trait impl items into the reachable set, as before). Addresses the concerns from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/29291#discussion_r43672413
\+ In `middle::reachable` don't treat impls of `Drop` specially, they are subsumed by the general impl treatment.
\+ Add some tests checking reachability of trait methods written in UFCS form
\+ Minor refactoring in the second commit
r? @alexcrichton
Currently if a print happens while a thread is being torn down it may cause a
panic if the LOCAL_STDOUT TLS slot has been destroyed by that point. This adds a
guard to check and prints to the process stdout if that's the case (as we do for
if the slot is already borrowed).
Closes#29488
If you try to put something that's bigger than a char into a char
literal, you get an error:
fn main() {
let c = 'ஶ்ரீ';
}
error: unterminated character constant:
This is a very compiler-centric message. Yes, it's technically
'unterminated', but that's not what you, the user did wrong.
Instead, this commit changes it to
error: character literal that's larger than a char:
As this actually tells you what went wrong.
Fixes#28851
If you try to put something that's bigger than a char into a char
literal, you get an error:
fn main() {
let c = 'ஶ்ரீ';
}
error: unterminated character constant:
This is a very compiler-centric message. Yes, it's technically
'unterminated', but that's not what you, the user did wrong.
Instead, this commit changes it to
error: character literal may only contain one codepoint
As this actually tells you what went wrong.
Fixes#28851
The "m" memory constraint in inline assembly is broken (generates incorrect code or triggers LLVM asserts) and should not be used. Instead, indirect memory operands should be used with "\*m", "=\*m" and "+\*m".
Clang does this transparently by transforming "m" constraints into "\*m" indirect constraints, but for now just being able to use "\*m" directly is enough since asm! isn't stable.
While "\*m" works fine as an input operand, "=\*m" and "+\*m" need to be specified as input operands because they take a pointer value as an input. This PR relaxes the constraint checker to allow constraints starting with "=" or "+" if the constraint string contains a "\*", which indicates an indirect operand.
This (indirectly) fixes these issues: #29382, #16383 and #13366. The code will need to be changed to use "\*m" instead of "m".
Function arguments that are small aggregates get passed as integer types
instead. To correctly handle that, we need to use store_ty instead of
plain Store.
This branch implements a variant of trans that is based on MIR. It is very incomplete (intentionally), and had only the goal of laying out enough work to enable more incremental follow-on patches. Currently, only fns tagged with `#[rustc_mir]` use the new trans code. I plan to build up a meta-issue as well that tracks the various "not-yet-implemented" points. The only fn that has been tested so far is this amazingly complex "spike" fn:
```rust
#[rustc_mir]
fn sum(x: i32, y: i32) -> i32 {
x + y
}
```
In general, the most interesting commit is the last one. There are some points on which I would like feedback from @rust-lang/compiler:
- I did not use `Datum`. Originally, I thought that maybe just a `ValueRef` would be enough but I wound up with two very simple structures, `LvalueRef` and `OperandRef`, that just package up a `ValueRef` and a type. Because of MIR's structure, you don't wind up mixing by-ref and by-value so much, and I tend to think that a thinner abstraction layer is better here, but I'm not sure.
- Related to the above, I expect that sooner or later we will analyze temps (and maybe variables too) to find those whose address is never taken and which are word-sized and which perhaps meet a few other criteria. For those, we'll probably want to avoid the alloca, just because it means prettier code.
- I generally tried to re-use data structures from elsewhere in trans, though I'm sure we can trim these down.
- I didn't do any debuginfo primarily because it seems to want node-ids and we have only spans. I haven't really read into that code so I don't know what's going on there.
r? @nrc
`resolve_identifier` used to mark a variable as an upvar when used within a closure. However, the function is also used for the "unnecessary qualification" lint, which would mark paths whose last component had the same name as a local as upvars.
Fixes#29522
r? @eddyb
