syntax: improve parameter without type suggestions
Fixes#64252.
This PR improves the suggestions provided when function parameters
do not have types:
- A new suggestion is added for arbitrary self types, which suggests
adding `self: ` before the type.
- Existing suggestions are now provided when a `<` is found where a `:`
was expected (previously only `,` and `)` or trait items), this gives
suggestions in the case where the unnamed parameter type is generic
in a free function.
- The suggestion that a type name be provided (e.g. `fn foo(HashMap<u32>)`
-> `fn foo(HashMap: TypeName<u32>)`) will no longer occur when a `<` was
found instead of `:`.
- The ident will not be used for recovery when a `<` was found instead
of `:`.
r? @Centril
cc @estebank @yoshuawuyts
Reword E0392 slightly
Make it clearer that a type or lifetime argument not being used can be
fixed by referencing it in a struct's fields, not just using `PhathomData`.
CC #53589.
Improve HRTB error span when -Zno-leak-check is used
As described in #57374, NLL currently produces unhelpful higher-ranked
trait bound (HRTB) errors when '-Zno-leak-check' is enabled.
This PR tackles one half of this issue - making the error message point
at the proper span. The error message itself is still the very generic
"higher-ranked subtype error", but this can be improved in a follow-up
PR.
The root cause of the bad spans lies in how NLL attempts to compute the
'blamed' region, for which it will retrieve a span for.
Consider the following code, which (correctly) does not compile:
```rust
let my_val: u8 = 25;
let a: &u8 = &my_val;
let b = a;
let c = b;
let d: &'static u8 = c;
```
This will cause NLL to generate the following subtype constraints:
d :< c
c :< b
b <: a
Since normal Rust lifetimes are covariant, this results in the following
region constraints (I'm using 'd to denote the lifetime of 'd',
'c to denote the lifetime of 'c, etc.):
'c: 'd
'b: 'c
'a: 'b
From this, we can derive that 'a: 'd holds, which implies that 'a: 'static
must hold. However, this is not the case, since 'a refers to 'my_val',
which does not outlive the current function.
When NLL attempts to infer regions for this code, it will see that the
region 'a has grown 'too large' - it will be inferred to outlive
'static, despite the fact that is not declared as outliving 'static
We can find the region responsible, 'd, by starting at the *end* of
the 'constraint chain' we generated above. This works because for normal
(non-higher-ranked) lifetimes, we generally build up a 'chain' of
lifetime constraints *away* from the original variable/lifetime.
That is, our original lifetime 'a is required to outlive progressively
more regions. If it ends up living for too long, we can look at the
'end' of this chain to determine the 'most recent' usage that caused
the lifetime to grow too large.
However, this logic does not work correctly when higher-ranked trait
bounds (HRTBs) come into play. This is because HRTBs have
*contravariance* with respect to their bound regions. For example,
this code snippet compiles:
```rust
let a: for<'a> fn(&'a ()) = |_| {};
let b: fn(&'static ()) = a;
```
Here, we require that 'a' is a subtype of 'b'. Because of
contravariance, we end up with the region constraint 'static: 'a,
*not* 'a: 'static
This means that our 'constraint chains' grow in the opposite direction
of 'normal lifetime' constraint chains. As we introduce subtypes, our
lifetime ends up being outlived by other lifetimes, rather than
outliving other lifetimes. Therefore, starting at the end of the
'constraint chain' will cause us to 'blame' a lifetime close to the original
definition of a variable, instead of close to where the bad lifetime
constraint is introduced.
This PR improves how we select the region to blame for 'too large'
universal lifetimes, when bound lifetimes are involved. If the region
we're checking is a 'placeholder' region (e.g. the region 'a' in
for<'a>, or the implicit region in fn(&())), we start traversing the
constraint chain from the beginning, rather than the end.
There are two (maybe more) different ways we generate region constraints for NLL:
requirements generated from trait queries, and requirements generated
from MIR subtype constraints. While the former always use explicit
placeholder regions, the latter is more tricky. In order to implement
contravariance for HRTBs, TypeRelating replaces placeholder regions with
existential regions. This requires us to keep track of whether or not an
existential region was originally a placeholder region. When we look for
a region to blame, we check if our starting region is either a
placeholder region or is an existential region created from a
placeholder region. If so, we start iterating from the beginning of the
constraint chain, rather than the end.
[const-prop] Correctly handle locals that can't be propagated
`const_prop()` now handles writing the Rvalue into the Place in the
stack frame for us. So if we're not supposed to propagate that value,
we need to clear it.
r? @oli-obk
Fixes#64970
Enable support for `IndirectlyMutableLocals` in `rustc_peek`
This PR allows `rustc_peek` tests to be written for the `IndirectlyMutableLocals` analysis implemented in #64470. See any of the tests in [`test/ui/mir-dataflow`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/mir-dataflow/inits-1.rs) for an example.
Included in this PR is a major rewrite of the `rustc_peek` module. This was motivated by the differences between the `IndirectlyMutableLocals` analysis and the initialized places ones.
To properly test `IndirectlyMutableLocals`, we must pass locals by-value to `rustc_peek`, since any local that is not `Freeze` will be marked as indirectly mutable as soon as a reference to it is taken. Unfortunately, `UnsafeCell` is not `Copy`, so we can only do one `rustc_peek` on each value with interior mutability inside a test. I'm not sure how to deal with this restriction; perhaps I need to special case borrows preceding a call to `rustc_peek` in the analysis itself?
`rustc_peek` also assumed that the analysis was done on move paths and that its transfer function only needed to be applied at assignment statements. This PR removes both of those restrictions by adding a trait, `RustcPeekAt`, that controls how the peeked at `Place` maps to the current dataflow state and using a dataflow cursor to retrieve the state itself.
Finally, this PR adds a test which demonstrates some unsoundness in the `IndirectlyMutableLocals` analysis by converting a reference to a `Freeze` field to a reference to a `!Freeze` field by offsetting a pointer (or in this case transmuting a pointer to a ZST field with the same address as a `!Freeze` field). This does not represent a hole in the language proper, since this analysis is only used to validate `const` bodies, in which the unsound code will only compile with `-Zunleash-the-miri-inside-of-you`. Nevertheless, this should get fixed.
r? @oli-obk
Fix typo while setting `compile-flags` in test
This test is meant to check for an ICE when generating debug info, but didn't actually pass `-g` due to the typo.
I also removed the `FIXME`, since this needs to actually be built (not just checked) to trigger the ICE.
`const_prop()` now handles writing the Rvalue into the Place in the
stack frame for us. So if we're not supported to propagate that value,
we need to clear it.
This commit improves the suggestions provided when function parameters
do not have types:
- A new suggestion is added for arbitrary self types, which suggests
adding `self: ` before the type.
- Existing suggestions are now provided when a `<` is found where a `:`
was expected (previously only `,` and `)` or trait items), this gives
suggestions in the case where the unnamed parameter type is generic
in a free function.
- The suggestion that a type name be provided (e.g. `fn foo(HashMap<u32>)`
-> `fn foo(HashMap: TypeName<u32>)`) will no longer occur when a `<` was
found instead of `:`.
- The ident will not be used for recovery when a `<` was found instead
of `:`.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
As described in #57374, NLL currently produces unhelpful higher-ranked
trait bound (HRTB) errors when '-Zno-leak-check' is enabled.
This PR tackles one half of this issue - making the error message point
at the proper span. The error message itself is still the very generic
"higher-ranked subtype error", but this can be improved in a follow-up
PR.
The root cause of the bad spans lies in how NLL attempts to compute the
'blamed' region, for which it will retrieve a span for.
Consider the following code, which (correctly) does not compile:
```rust
let my_val: u8 = 25;
let a: &u8 = &my_val;
let b = a;
let c = b;
let d: &'static u8 = c;
```
This will cause NLL to generate the following subtype constraints:
d :< c
c :< b
b <: a
Since normal Rust lifetimes are covariant, this results in the following
region constraints (I'm using 'd to denote the lifetime of 'd',
'c to denote the lifetime of 'c, etc.):
'c: 'd
'b: 'c
'a: 'b
From this, we can derive that 'a: 'd holds, which implies that 'a: 'static
must hold. However, this is not the case, since 'a refers to 'my_val',
which does not outlive the current function.
When NLL attempts to infer regions for this code, it will see that the
region 'a has grown 'too large' - it will be inferred to outlive
'static, despite the fact that is not declared as outliving 'static
We can find the region responsible, 'd, by starting at the *end* of
the 'constraint chain' we generated above. This works because for normal
(non-higher-ranked) lifetimes, we generally build up a 'chain' of
lifetime constraints *away* from the original variable/lifetime.
That is, our original lifetime 'a is required to outlive progressively
more regions. If it ends up living for too long, we can look at the
'end' of this chain to determine the 'most recent' usage that caused
the lifetime to grow too large.
However, this logic does not work correctly when higher-ranked trait
bounds (HRTBs) come into play. This is because HRTBs have
*contravariance* with respect to their bound regions. For example,
this code snippet compiles:
```rust
let a: for<'a> fn(&'a ()) = |_| {};
let b: fn(&'static ()) = a;
```
Here, we require that 'a' is a subtype of 'b'. Because of
contravariance, we end up with the region constraint 'static: 'a,
*not* 'a: 'static
This means that our 'constraint chains' grow in the opposite direction
of 'normal lifetime' constraint chains. As we introduce subtypes, our
lifetime ends up being outlived by other lifetimes, rather than
outliving other lifetimes. Therefore, starting at the end of the
'constraint chain' will cause us to 'blame' a lifetime close to the original
definition of a variable, instead of close to where the bad lifetime
constraint is introduced.
This PR improves how we select the region to blame for 'too large'
universal lifetimes, when bound lifetimes are involved. If the region
we're checking is a 'placeholder' region (e.g. the region 'a' in
for<'a>, or the implicit region in fn(&())), we start traversing the
constraint chain from the beginning, rather than the end.
There are two (maybe more) different ways we generate region constraints for NLL:
requirements generated from trait queries, and requirements generated
from MIR subtype constraints. While the former always use explicit
placeholder regions, the latter is more tricky. In order to implement
contravariance for HRTBs, TypeRelating replaces placeholder regions with
existential regions. This requires us to keep track of whether or not an
existential region was originally a placeholder region. When we look for
a region to blame, we check if our starting region is either a
placeholder region or is an existential region created from a
placeholder region. If so, we start iterating from the beginning of the
constraint chain, rather than the end.
syntax: cleanup param, method, and misc parsing
Do some misc cleanup of the parser:
- Method and parameter parsing is refactored.
- A parser for `const | mut` is introduced that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64588 can reuse.
- Some other misc parsing.
Next up in a different PR:
- ~Implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64252.~ -- maybe some other time...
- Heavily restructuring up `item.rs` which is a mess (hopefully, no promises ^^).
r? @petrochenkov
Deduplicate closure type errors
Closure typing obligations flow in both direcitons to properly infer
types. Because of this, we will get 2 type errors whenever there's
an unfulfilled obligation. To avoid this, we deduplicate them in the
`InferCtxt`.
Silence unreachable code lint from await desugaring
Fixes#61798.
This PR silences the unreachable code lint when it originates from within an await desugaring.
A small amount of tidying-up factored out from PR #64648
As requested by @Mark-Simulacrum, I put this in a separate commit to make it easier to review. (As far as I can tell, no violations of the policy here, and they are simply in a separate PR because they're not directly related to the import of that PR.)
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
async/await: improve not-send errors
cc #64130.
```
note: future does not implement `std::marker::Send` because this value is used across an await
--> $DIR/issue-64130-non-send-future-diags.rs:15:5
|
LL | let g = x.lock().unwrap();
| - has type `std::sync::MutexGuard<'_, u32>`
LL | baz().await;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ await occurs here, with `g` maybe used later
LL | }
| - `g` is later dropped here
```
r? @nikomatsakis
syntax: recover trailing `|` in or-patterns
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64879.
For example (this also shows that we are sensitive to the typo `||`):
```
error: a trailing `|` is not allowed in an or-pattern
--> $DIR/remove-leading-vert.rs:33:11
|
LL | A || => {}
| - ^^ help: remove the `||`
| |
| while parsing this or-pattern starting here
|
= note: alternatives in or-patterns are separated with `|`, not `||`
```
r? @estebank
syntax: Support modern attribute syntax in the `meta` matcher
Where "modern" means https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57367:
```
PATH
PATH `(` TOKEN_STREAM `)`
PATH `[` TOKEN_STREAM `]`
PATH `{` TOKEN_STREAM `}`
```
Unfortunately, `meta` wasn't future-proofed using the `FOLLOW` token set like other matchers (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34011), so code like `$meta:meta {` or `$meta:meta [` may break, and we need a crater run to find out how often this happens in practice.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49629 (by fully supporting `meta` rather than removing it.)
Closure typing obligations flow in both direcitons to properly infer
types. Because of this, we will get 2 type errors whenever there's
an unfulfilled obligation. To avoid this, we deduplicate them in the
`InferCtxt`.
This commit improves obligation errors for async/await:
```
note: future does not implement `std::marker::Send` because this value is used across an
await
--> $DIR/issue-64130-non-send-future-diags.rs:15:5
|
LL | let g = x.lock().unwrap();
| - has type `std::sync::MutexGuard<'_, u32>`
LL | baz().await;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ await occurs here, with `g` maybe used later
LL | }
| - `g` is later dropped here
```
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
