Use proper span for tuple index parsed as float
Fix diagnostic suggestion from:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| (1, (2, 3)).((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
to the correct:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| ((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
Fix#41081.
Fix diagnostic suggestion from:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| (1, (2, 3)).((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
to the correct:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| ((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
Add a `TyErr` type to represent unknown types in places where
parse errors have happened, while still able to build the AST.
Initially only used to represent incorrectly written fn arguments and
avoid "expected X parameters, found Y" errors when called with the
appropriate amount of parameters. We cannot use `TyInfer` for this as
`_` is not allowed as a valid argument type.
Example output:
```rust
error: expected one of `:` or `@`, found `,`
--> file.rs:12:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y: usize) {}
| ^
error[E0061]: this function takes 2 parameters but 3 parameters were supplied
--> file.rs:19:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y) {}
| --------------- defined here
...
19 | bar(1, 2, 3);
| ^^^^^^^ expected 2 parameters
```
`match { }` now (correctly?) indicates divergence, which results in more
unreachable warnings. We also avoid fallback to `!` if there is just one
arm (see new test: `match-unresolved-one-arm.rs`).
* Point at where the token was expected instead of the last token
successfuly parsed.
* Only show `unexpected token` if the next char and the unexpected token
don't have the same span.
* Change some cfail and pfail tests to ui test.
* Don't show all possible tokens in span label if they are more than 6.
```rust
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `}`, or an operator, found `)`
--> $DIR/token-error-correct-3.rs:29:9
|
25 | foo()
| - expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `}`, or an operator after this
...
29 | } else {
| ^ unexpected token
```
```rust
struct S;
impl S {
pub hello_method(&self) {
println!("Hello");
}
}
fn main() { S.hello_method(); }
```
```rust
error: can't qualify macro invocation with `pub`
--> file.rs:3:4
|
3 | pub hello_method(&self) {
| ^^^- - expected `!` here for a macro invocation
| |
| did you mean to write `fn` here for a method declaration?
|
= help: try adjusting the macro to put `pub` inside the invocation
```
Given the following statement
```rust
pub (a) fn afn() {}
```
Provide the following diagnostic:
```rust
error: incorrect restriction in `pub`
--> file.rs:15:1
|
15 | pub (a) fn afn() {}
| ^^^^^^^
|
= help: some valid visibility restrictions are:
`pub(crate)`: visible only on the current crate
`pub(super)`: visible only in the current module's parent
`pub(in path::to::module)`: visible only on the specified path
help: to make this visible only to module `a`, add `in` before the path:
| pub (in a) fn afn() {}
```
Remove cruft from old `pub(path)` syntax.
Whenever we parse a chain of binary operations, as long as the first
operation is `<` and the subsequent operations are either `>` or `<`,
present the following diagnostic help:
use `::<...>` instead of `<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
This will lead to spurious recommendations on situations like
`2 < 3 < 4` but should be clear from context that the help doesn't apply
in that case.
