Add eslint checks to CI
It also allowed me to fix some potential issues that went unnoticed. Having this process automated will hopefully prevent us to add more errors. :)
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` (for the add in the CI).
r? `@jsha`
Bring back `x86_64-sun-solaris` target to rustup
Change #82216 removed now deprecated target `x86_64-sun-solaris` from CI, thus making it no longer possible to use `$ rustup target add x86_64-sun-solaris` to install given target (see #85098 for details). Since there should be a period of time between the deprecation and removal, this PR brings it back (while keeping the new one as well).
Please, correct me if I am wrong; my assumption that these Docker scripts are being used to build artifacts later used by `rustup` might be incorrect.
Closes#85098.
Generate not more docs than necessary
This is something that `@Nemo157` was talking about: they wanted that when using `x.py doc std`, it only generated `std` (and the crates "before" it).
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Convert rustfmt from a submodule to a subtree
r? `@calebcartwright` cc `@Manishearth` `@Mark-Simulacrum`
The motivation is that submodule updates cause rustfmt to not be available on nightly a lot; most recently it was unavailable for over 10 days, causing the beta release to be delayed. Additionally this is much less work on the part of the rustfmt maintainers to keep the rustfmt compiling, since now people making breaking changes will be responsible for fixing them.
I kept the rustfmt git history so it looks like there are thousands of commits. The important commits are https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/851dee3af9404bf399c3c4ffefe5105edb3debad~..pull/82208/head. This adds about 10 MB of git history, which is not terribly much compared to the 702 MB that already exist.
- Add `src/tools/rustfmt` to `x.py check`
- Fix CRLF issues with rustfmt tests (see commit for details)
- Use `rustc_private` instead of crates.io dependencies
This was already switched upstream and would have landed in the next submodule bump anyway. This just updates Cargo.lock for rust-lang/rust.
- Add `yansi-term` to the list of allowed dependencies.
This is a false positive - rustc doesn't actually use it, only rustfmt, but because it's activated by the cargo feature of a dependency, tidy gets confused. It's fairly innocuous in any case, it's used for color printing.
This would have happened in the next submodule bump.
- Remove rustfmt from the list of toolstate tools.
- Give a hard error if testing or building rustfmt fails.
- Update log to 0.4.14
This avoids a warning about semicolons in macros; see the commit for details.
- Don't add tools to the sysroot when they finish building.
This is the only change that could be considered a regression - this avoids a "colliding StableCrateId" error due to a bug in resolve (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56935). The regression is that this rebuilds dependencies more often than strictly necessary. See the commit for details.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85226 (permanently). Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82385. Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70651. Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80639.
Error out if a PR is sent to the wrong channel
It happened multiple times that a PR meant to go on beta ends up being opened (and occasionally merged) to master. This PR does two things:
* Moves the definition of the channel in `src/ci/channel` so it's easier for tools to read it. I was not sure whether to move it to `src/channel` (like `src/version`): ended up with `src/ci` as it's currently only used for CI, but I'm open to moving it to `src`. We'll need to update the release process after this.
* Adds a check on **non-bors** builds that errors out if the base branch is not the expected one for the currently defined channel. This will not cause problems for promotion PRs, as those PRs are meant to also update the channel name.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
- Add rustfmt to `x.py check`
- Update Cargo.lock
- Remove rustfmt from the toolstate list
- Make rustfmt an in-tree tool
- Give an error on `x.py test rustfmt` if rustfmt fails to build or if tests fail
- Don't call `save_toolstate` when testing rustfmt
Retry clang+llvm download
We've been seeing a pretty high rate of spurious network failures (e.g., openssl
connection reset by peer). Not clear why, but let's add a retry.
r? `@pietroalbini`
Currently, we have LLVM tarballs for win64, generated by someone running
the installer via wine and tarring up the result.
7z knows how to extract NSIS installers directly, and the result is
identical to our tarball, except that it doesn't include `Uninstall.exe`
(which we don't care about) and it includes the NSIS plugin directory
(which we also don't care about).
This simplifies the process of upgrading CI, and allows us to just
mirror the upstream release .exe directly. This also improves our
supply chain.
further split up const_fn feature flag
This continues the work on splitting up `const_fn` into separate feature flags:
* `const_fn_trait_bound` for `const fn` with trait bounds
* `const_fn_unsize` for unsizing coercions in `const fn` (looks like only `dyn` unsizing is still guarded here)
I don't know if there are even any things left that `const_fn` guards... at least libcore and liballoc do not need it any more.
`@oli-obk` are you currently able to do reviews?
This commit implements the idea of a new ABI for the WebAssembly target,
one called `"wasm"`. This ABI is entirely of my own invention
and has no current precedent, but I think that the addition of this ABI
might help solve a number of issues with the WebAssembly targets.
When `wasm32-unknown-unknown` was first added to Rust I naively
"implemented an abi" for the target. I then went to write `wasm-bindgen`
which accidentally relied on details of this ABI. Turns out the ABI
definition didn't match C, which is causing issues for C/Rust interop.
Currently the compiler has a "wasm32 bindgen compat" ABI which is the
original implementation I added, and it's purely there for, well,
`wasm-bindgen`.
Another issue with the WebAssembly target is that it's not clear to me
when and if the default C ABI will change to account for WebAssembly's
multi-value feature (a feature that allows functions to return multiple
values). Even if this does happen, though, it seems like the C ABI will
be guided based on the performance of WebAssembly code and will likely
not match even what the current wasm-bindgen-compat ABI is today. This
leaves a hole in Rust's expressivity in binding WebAssembly where given
a particular import type, Rust may not be able to import that signature
with an updated C ABI for multi-value.
To fix these issues I had the idea of a new ABI for WebAssembly, one
called `wasm`. The definition of this ABI is "what you write
maps straight to wasm". The goal here is that whatever you write down in
the parameter list or in the return values goes straight into the
function's signature in the WebAssembly file. This special ABI is for
intentionally matching the ABI of an imported function from the
environment or exporting a function with the right signature.
With the addition of a new ABI, this enables rustc to:
* Eventually remove the "wasm-bindgen compat hack". Once this
ABI is stable wasm-bindgen can switch to using it everywhere.
Afterwards the wasm32-unknown-unknown target can have its default ABI
updated to match C.
* Expose the ability to precisely match an ABI signature for a
WebAssembly function, regardless of what the C ABI that clang chooses
turns out to be.
* Continue to evolve the definition of the default C ABI to match what
clang does on all targets, since the purpose of that ABI will be
explicitly matching C rather than generating particular function
imports/exports.
Naturally this is implemented as an unstable feature initially, but it
would be nice for this to get stabilized (if it works) in the near-ish
future to remove the wasm32-unknown-unknown incompatibility with the C
ABI. Doing this, however, requires the feature to be on stable because
wasm-bindgen works with stable Rust.
Certain features of Linux (getauxval() and epoll_create1()) are only
available in android SDK/NDK levels 18 and 21 respectively. The 32bit
platform is currently on level 14 for compatibility with Android 4.0.
This patch adds SDK/NDK level 21 to the docker for 32 bit platforms,
while leaving the default setup at level 14.
With this done, projects such as `rustup` which rely on these dockers
can build with modern ecosystem crates such as tokio 1.0, by using
the level 21 toolchain, but those which do not need to switch will
be unaffected, since the level 14 toolchain remains available.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@digital-scurf.org>
Pin es-check version to prevent unrelated CI failures
es-check v5.2.1 causes a lot of unrelated CI failures on mingw-check, e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80723#issuecomment-790294196.
es-check v5.2.2 fixes it but let's pin its version to prevent further failures.
Upgrade to LLVM 12
This implements the necessary adjustments to make rustc work with LLVM 12. I didn't encounter any major issues so far.
r? `@cuviper`
musl-toolchain.sh is called with REPLACE_CC=1, so it will replace
the host compiler and the subsequent cmake build will fail because
it cannot find the openssl headers.
Move the cmake build earlier, so it happens before the compiler
is replaced.
Python 2 is needed for Clang 10, Python 3 for LLVM 12.
The Python 2 dependency could be removed by upgrading to Clang 11,
but that causes linker errors of unclear origin.
