This adds auto-assertion to `rustc_clean/dirty` and also implements
more comprehensive testing for
- src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_constructors.rs
- src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_defs.rs
- src/test/incremental/hashes/extern_mods.rs
- src/test/incremental/hashes/inherent_impls.rs
- src/test/incremental/hashes/statics.rs
- src/test/incremental/hashes/struct_constructors.rs
- src/test/incremental/hashes/type_defs.rs
trait_defs.rs and trait_impl.rs are blocked on a hard to triage
compiler ICE (at least hard for a newbie like me) having to do
with some DepNodes not getting computed for traits.
A FIXME has been added in the source to reflect this continued
work.
MIR-borrowck: moves of prefixes invalidate uses too
I overlooked the fact that when we check if a path is moved, we need to check for interference between the (shallow) prefixes and the use in question.
~~Long term, we may want to revise how this computation is done. For example, it might be better to represent the set of invalidated prefixes in the dataflow computation (the `maybe_uninitialized` dataflow), and thus avoid one of the loops in the code here.~~
* Update: I was wrong in my original recollection of the dataflow code, which actually does the right thing, in terms of precisely tracking substructure initialization and movement.
Fix#44833
----
Update: The initial version of this PR's description (and the code as well) erroneously focused on supporting prefixes. ~~But the two main cases of interest are: 1. the *shallow* prefixes, and 2. the deref-free prefix built off a local (if the lvalue is indeed built off a local)~~
Update 2: The main cases of interest are in fact: 1. the nearest prefix with a MovePath, and 2. the suffixes.
let rustdoc print the crate version into docs
This PR adds a new unstable flag to rustdoc, `--crate-version`, which when present will add a new entry to the sidebar of the root module, printing the given version number:
Closes#24336
(The WIP status is because i don't want to merge this until i can get the std docs to use it, which i need help from rustbuild people to make sure i get right.)
This commit updates the reachability pass of the compiler to seed the local
worklist with `#[linkage]`-like items anywhere in a crate, not just those
reachable from public items.
Closes#45165
MIR borrowck: print lvalues in error messages in the same way that the AST borrowck
Fix#44974
- Print fields with `.name` rather than `.<num>`
- Autoderef values if followed by a field or an index
- Output `[..]` when borrowing inside a slice
This commit updates the handling of `#[inline(always)]` functions at -O0 to
ensure that it's always inlined regardless of the number of codegen units used.
Closes#45201
(There are other tests that this PR also improves, but were not
completely synchronized. I chose to wait until later to pull those
into the `revisions: ast mir` testing pattern; later being either when
they *are* synchronized, or in some PR where we migrate all borrowck
tests, regardless of whether MIR-borrowck is "finished" for them or
not.)
This informs LLVM that functions can't unwind, which while it should typically
have already been inferred when necessary or otherwise not impact codegen is
apparently needed on targets like ARM to avoid references to unnecessary
symbols.
Closes#44992
Refactor fmt::Display and fmt::Debug impls in ppaux
Also fixes#44887.
There was a problem that unnamed late-bound regions are *always* named `'r` while they are displayed using `std::fmt::Display`.
---
```rust
fn main() {
f(|_: (), _: ()| {});
}
fn f<F>(_: F) where F: Fn(&(), for<'r> fn(&'r ())) {}
```
Before (incorrectly shadows lifetime, `for<'r>` omitted for the second argument):
```
error[E0631]: type mismatch in closure arguments
--> test.rs:2:5
|
2 | f(|_: (), _: ()| {});
| ^ ----------------- found signature of `fn((), ()) -> _`
| |
| expected signature of `for<'r> fn(&'r (), fn(&'r ())) -> _`
|
= note: required by `f`
```
After:
```
error[E0631]: type mismatch in closure arguments
--> test.rs:2:5
|
2 | f(|_: (), _: ()| {});
| ^ ----------------- found signature of `fn((), ()) -> _`
| |
| expected signature of `for<'s> fn(&'s (), for<'r> fn(&'r ())) -> _`
|
= note: required by `f`
```
r? @nikomatsakis
Update let-expressions.rs with DepNode labels
As a part of #44924, the PR has tests verified for the following dependency nodes for **let-expressions**
```
- MirValidated
- MirOptimized
- TypeCheckTables
- TypeOfItem
- GenericsOfItem
- PredicatesOfItem
- FnSignature
```
As we are more concerned with the function body, the following fingerprints do not change over compilation sessions.
```- TypeOfItem
- GenericsOfItem
- PredicatesOfItem
- FnSignature
```
r? @nikomatsakis
cc @michaelwoerister
P.S. Will add more tests as and when possible :)
Implement display_hint in gdb pretty printers
A few pretty-printers were returning a quoted string from their
to_string method. It's preferable in gdb to return a lazy string and to
let gdb handle the display by having a "display_hint" method that
returns "string" -- it lets gdb settings (like "set print ...") work, it
handles corrupted strings a bit better, and it passes the information
along to IDEs.
incr.comp.: Move macro-export test case to src/test/incremental.
`compile-fail/incr_comp_with_macro_export.rs` was trying to role its own incremental compilation setup. This started to cause problems. There's no reason to not just make this a regular `src/test/incremental` test.
Fixes#45062.
Fix data-layout field in x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.json test file
The current data-layout causes the following error:
> rustc: /checkout/src/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp:151: void llvm::MachineFunction::init(): Assertion `Target.isCompatibleDataLayout(getDataLayout()) && "Can't create a MachineFunction using a Module with a " "Target-incompatible DataLayout attached\n"' failed.
The new value was generated according to [this comment by @japaric](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31367#issuecomment-213595571).
rustc: Don't inline in CGUs at -O0
This commit tweaks the behavior of inlining functions into multiple codegen
units when rustc is compiling in debug mode. Today rustc will unconditionally
treat `#[inline]` functions by translating them into all codegen units that
they're needed within, marking the linkage as `internal`. This commit changes
the behavior so that in debug mode (compiling at `-O0`) rustc will instead only
translate `#[inline]` functions into *one* codegen unit, forcing all other
codegen units to reference this one copy.
The goal here is to improve debug compile times by reducing the amount of
translation that happens on behalf of multiple codegen units. It was discovered
in #44941 that increasing the number of codegen units had the adverse side
effect of increasing the overal work done by the compiler, and the suspicion
here was that the compiler was inlining, translating, and codegen'ing more
functions with more codegen units (for example `String` would be basically
inlined into all codegen units if used). The strategy in this commit should
reduce the cost of `#[inline]` functions to being equivalent to one codegen
unit, which is only translating and codegen'ing inline functions once.
Collected [data] shows that this does indeed improve the situation from [before]
as the overall cpu-clock time increases at a much slower rate and when pinned to
one core rustc does not consume significantly more wall clock time than with one
codegen unit.
One caveat of this commit is that the symbol names for inlined functions that
are only translated once needed some slight tweaking. These inline functions
could be translated into multiple crates and we need to make sure the symbols
don't collideA so the crate name/disambiguator is mixed in to the symbol name
hash in these situations.
[data]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44941#issuecomment-334880911
[before]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44941#issuecomment-334583384
MIR-borrowck: gather and signal any move errors
When building up the `MoveData` structure for a given MIR, also accumulate any erroneous actions, and then report all of those errors when the construction is complete.
This PR adds a host of move-related error constructor methods to `trait BorrowckErrors`. I think I got the notes right; but we should plan to audit all of the notes before turning MIR-borrowck on by default.
Fix#44830
Fix some E-needstest issues.
Also ignore `attr-on-trait` test on stage-1 to keep `./x.py test --stage 1` successful.
Fixes#30355.
Fixes#33241.
Fixes#36400.
Fixes#37887.
Fixes#44578.
This commit tweaks the behavior of inlining functions into multiple codegen
units when rustc is compiling in debug mode. Today rustc will unconditionally
treat `#[inline]` functions by translating them into all codegen units that
they're needed within, marking the linkage as `internal`. This commit changes
the behavior so that in debug mode (compiling at `-O0`) rustc will instead only
translate `#[inline]` functions into *one* codegen unit, forcing all other
codegen units to reference this one copy.
The goal here is to improve debug compile times by reducing the amount of
translation that happens on behalf of multiple codegen units. It was discovered
in #44941 that increasing the number of codegen units had the adverse side
effect of increasing the overal work done by the compiler, and the suspicion
here was that the compiler was inlining, translating, and codegen'ing more
functions with more codegen units (for example `String` would be basically
inlined into all codegen units if used). The strategy in this commit should
reduce the cost of `#[inline]` functions to being equivalent to one codegen
unit, which is only translating and codegen'ing inline functions once.
Collected [data] shows that this does indeed improve the situation from [before]
as the overall cpu-clock time increases at a much slower rate and when pinned to
one core rustc does not consume significantly more wall clock time than with one
codegen unit.
One caveat of this commit is that the symbol names for inlined functions that
are only translated once needed some slight tweaking. These inline functions
could be translated into multiple crates and we need to make sure the symbols
don't collideA so the crate name/disambiguator is mixed in to the symbol name
hash in these situations.
[data]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44941#issuecomment-334880911
[before]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44941#issuecomment-334583384
rustc: Implement ThinLTO
This commit is an implementation of LLVM's ThinLTO for consumption in rustc
itself. Currently today LTO works by merging all relevant LLVM modules into one
and then running optimization passes. "Thin" LTO operates differently by having
more sharded work and allowing parallelism opportunities between optimizing
codegen units. Further down the road Thin LTO also allows *incremental* LTO
which should enable even faster release builds without compromising on the
performance we have today.
This commit uses a `-Z thinlto` flag to gate whether ThinLTO is enabled. It then
also implements two forms of ThinLTO:
* In one mode we'll *only* perform ThinLTO over the codegen units produced in a
single compilation. That is, we won't load upstream rlibs, but we'll instead
just perform ThinLTO amongst all codegen units produced by the compiler for
the local crate. This is intended to emulate a desired end point where we have
codegen units turned on by default for all crates and ThinLTO allows us to do
this without performance loss.
* In anther mode, like full LTO today, we'll optimize all upstream dependencies
in "thin" mode. Unlike today, however, this LTO step is fully parallelized so
should finish much more quickly.
There's a good bit of comments about what the implementation is doing and where
it came from, but the tl;dr; is that currently most of the support here is
copied from upstream LLVM. This code duplication is done for a number of
reasons:
* Controlling parallelism means we can use the existing jobserver support to
avoid overloading machines.
* We will likely want a slightly different form of incremental caching which
integrates with our own incremental strategy, but this is yet to be
determined.
* This buys us some flexibility about when/where we run ThinLTO, as well as
having it tailored to fit our needs for the time being.
* Finally this allows us to reuse some artifacts such as our `TargetMachine`
creation, where all our options we used today aren't necessarily supported by
upstream LLVM yet.
My hope is that we can get some experience with this copy/paste in tree and then
eventually upstream some work to LLVM itself to avoid the duplication while
still ensuring our needs are met. Otherwise I fear that maintaining these
bindings may be quite costly over the years with LLVM updates!
Fnty args rustdoc
Fixes#44570.
cc @QuietMisdreavus
cc @rust-lang/dev-tools
Considering the impact on the `hir` libs, I'll put @eddyb as reviewer.
r? @eddyb
This commit is an implementation of LLVM's ThinLTO for consumption in rustc
itself. Currently today LTO works by merging all relevant LLVM modules into one
and then running optimization passes. "Thin" LTO operates differently by having
more sharded work and allowing parallelism opportunities between optimizing
codegen units. Further down the road Thin LTO also allows *incremental* LTO
which should enable even faster release builds without compromising on the
performance we have today.
This commit uses a `-Z thinlto` flag to gate whether ThinLTO is enabled. It then
also implements two forms of ThinLTO:
* In one mode we'll *only* perform ThinLTO over the codegen units produced in a
single compilation. That is, we won't load upstream rlibs, but we'll instead
just perform ThinLTO amongst all codegen units produced by the compiler for
the local crate. This is intended to emulate a desired end point where we have
codegen units turned on by default for all crates and ThinLTO allows us to do
this without performance loss.
* In anther mode, like full LTO today, we'll optimize all upstream dependencies
in "thin" mode. Unlike today, however, this LTO step is fully parallelized so
should finish much more quickly.
There's a good bit of comments about what the implementation is doing and where
it came from, but the tl;dr; is that currently most of the support here is
copied from upstream LLVM. This code duplication is done for a number of
reasons:
* Controlling parallelism means we can use the existing jobserver support to
avoid overloading machines.
* We will likely want a slightly different form of incremental caching which
integrates with our own incremental strategy, but this is yet to be
determined.
* This buys us some flexibility about when/where we run ThinLTO, as well as
having it tailored to fit our needs for the time being.
* Finally this allows us to reuse some artifacts such as our `TargetMachine`
creation, where all our options we used today aren't necessarily supported by
upstream LLVM yet.
My hope is that we can get some experience with this copy/paste in tree and then
eventually upstream some work to LLVM itself to avoid the duplication while
still ensuring our needs are met. Otherwise I fear that maintaining these
bindings may be quite costly over the years with LLVM updates!
