make precise capturing args in rustdoc Json typed
close#137616
This PR includes below changes.
- Add `rustc_hir::PreciseCapturingArgKind` which allows the query system to return a arg's data.
- Add `rustdoc::clean::types::PreciseCapturingArg` and change to use it.
- Add `rustdoc-json-types::PreciseCapturingArg` and change to use it.
- Update `tests/rustdoc-json/impl-trait-precise-capturing.rs`.
- Bump `rustdoc_json_types::FORMAT_VERSION`.
attempt to support `BinaryFormat::Xcoff` in `naked_asm!`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137219
So, the inline assembly support for xcoff is extremely limited. The LLVM [XCOFFAsmParser](1b25c0c4da/llvm/lib/MC/MCParser/XCOFFAsmParser.cpp) does not support many of the attributes that LLVM itself emits, and that should exist based on [the assembler docs](https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ssw_aix_71/assembler/assembler_pdf.pdf). It also does accept some that should not exist based on those docs.
So, I've tried to do the best I can given those limitations. At least it's better than emitting the directives for elf and having that fail somewhere deep in LLVM. Given that inline assembly for this target is incomplete (under `asm_experimental_arch`), I think that's OK (and again I don't see how we can do better given the limitations in LLVM).
r? ```@Noratrieb``` (given that you reviewed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136637)
It seems reasonable to ping the [`powerpc64-ibm-aix` target maintainers](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/platform-support/aix.html), hopefully they have thoughts too: ```@daltenty``` ```@gilamn5tr```
naked functions: on windows emit `.endef` without the symbol name
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138320
The `.endef` directive does not take the name as an argument. Apparently the LLVM x86_64 parser does accept this, but on i686 it's rejected. In general `i686` does some special name mangling stuff, so it's good to include it in the naked function tests.
r? ````@ChrisDenton```` (because windows)
Do not register `Self: AutoTrait` when confirming auto trait (in old solver)
Every built-in auto impl for a trait goal like `Ty: Auto` immediately registers another obligation of `Ty: Auto` as one of its nested obligations, leading to us stressing the cycle detection machinery a lot more than we need to. This is because all traits have a `Self: Trait` predicate.
To fix this, remove the call to `impl_or_trait_obligations` in `vtable_auto_impl`, since auto traits do not have where clauses.
r? lcnr
Use sa_sigaction instead of sa_union.__su_sigaction for AIX
Revert test cases to use `sa_sigaction` instead of `sa_union.__su_sigaction`, now that the `libc` crate implementation for AIX defines `sa_sigaction` as a direct member of `struct sigaction`, aligning it with implementations on other similar platforms. ([[AIX] Use sa_sigaction instead of the union](https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/4250)).
Disentangle `ForwardGenericParamBan` and `ConstParamTy` ribs
In #137617, the `ConstParamTy` rib was adjusted to act kinda like the `ForwardGenericParamBan`. However, this means that it no longer served its purpose banning generics from *parent items*. Although we still are checking for param type validity using the `ConstParamTy_` trait, which means that we weren't accepting code we shouldn't, I think it's a bit strange for us not to be rejecting code like this during *resolution* and instead letting these malformed const generics leak into the type system:
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
fn bar<const N: T>() {}
}
```
This PR does a few things:
1. Introduce a `ForwardGenericParamBanReason` enum, and start using the `ForwardGenericParamBan` rib to ban forward-declared params in const tys when `generic_const_parameter_types` is enabled.
2. Start using the `ConstParamTy` rib to ban *all* generics when `generic_const_parameter_types` is disabled.
3. Improve the diagnostics for both of the cases above, and for forward-declared params in parameter defaults too :3
r? `@BoxyUwU` or reassign
Support rmeta inputs for --crate-type=bin --emit=obj
This already works for --emit=metadata, but is possible anytime we're not linking.
Tests:
- `rmeta_bin` checks we're not changing --emit=link (already passes)
- `rmeta_bin-pass` tests the new behavior for --emit=obj (would fail today) and also --emit=metadata which isn't changing
change definitely unproductive cycles to error
builds on top of #136824 by adding a third variant to `PathKind` for paths which may change to be coinductive in the future but must not be so right now. Most notably, impl where-clauses of not yet coinductive traits.
With this, we can change cycles which are definitely unproductive to a proper error. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/114. This does not affect stable as we keep these cycles as ambiguous during coherence.
r? ````````@compiler-errors```````` ````````@nikomatsakis````````
Fix false-positive in `expr_or_init` and in the `invalid_from_utf8` lint
This PR fixes the logic for finding initializer in the `expr_or_init` and `expr_or_init_with_outside_body` functions.
If the binding were to be mutable (`let mut`), the logic wouldn't consider that the initializer expression could have been modified and would return the init expression even-trough multiple subsequent assignments could have been done.
Example:
```rust
let mut a = [99, 108, 130, 105, 112, 112]; // invalid, not UTF-8
loop {
a = *b"clippy"; // valid
break;
}
std::str::from_utf8_mut(&mut a); // currently warns, with this PR it doesn't
```
This PR modifies the logic to excludes mutable let bindings.
Found when using `expr_or_init` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119220.
r? compiler
Elaborate trait assumption in `receiver_is_dispatchable`
Fixes#138172. See comment on the linked test.
Probably not a fix for the general problem, bc I think this may still be incomplete for other weird `where` clauses on the receiver. But 🤷, supertraits seems like an obvious one to fix.
strip `-Wlinker-messages` wrappers from `rust-lld` rmake test
The `tests/run-make/rust-lld` rmake test is failing locally on my M1, due to linker messages being in a different shape than the test expects: it asserts that the LLD version is the first linker message, which is seemingly not always the case on osx I guess.
```console
thread 'main' panicked at /Users/lqd/rust/lqd-rust/tests/run-make/rust-lld/rmake.rs:24:5:
the LLD version string should be present in the output logs:
warning: linker stderr: rust-lld: directory not found for option -L/usr/local/lib
LLD 20.1.0 (https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project.git 1c3bb96fdb6db7b8e8f24edb016099c223fdd27e)
Library search paths:
/Users/lqd/rust/lqd-rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/test/run-make/rust-lld/rmake_out
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/lib
Framework search paths:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks
```
This PR normalizes away the `-Wlinker-messages` wrappers around the linker output, to remove the requirement that the linker version is the first linker message / is prefixed with the warning wrapper in the regex.
(also another strange thing to explain the pre-existing regex: it seems the LLD version is sometimes output on stderr sometimes on stdout cool stuff)
We could do this for the other lld rmake tests, but they're only enabled on x64 linux so less likely to have random linker messages appearing without anyone noticing.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137715 (Allow int literals for pattern types with int base types)
- #138002 (Disable CFI for weakly linked syscalls)
- #138051 (Add support for downloading GCC from CI)
- #138231 (Prevent ICE in autodiff validation by emitting user-friendly errors)
- #138245 (stabilize `ci_rustc_if_unchanged_logic` test for local environments)
- #138256 (Do not feed anon const a type that references generics that it does not have)
- #138284 (Do not write user type annotation for const param value path)
- #138296 (Remove `AdtFlags::IS_ANONYMOUS` and `Copy`/`Clone` condition for anonymous ADT)
- #138352 (miri native_calls: ensure we actually expose *mutable* provenance to the memory FFI can access)
- #138354 (remove redundant `body` arguments)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not write user type annotation for const param value path
As I noted in the code comment, `DefKind::ConstParam` isn't actually *generic* over its own args, we just use the identity args from the body when lowering the value path so we have something to plug into the `EarlyBinder` we get back from `type_of` for the const param. So skip over it in `write_user_type_annotation_from_args`.
Somewhat unrelated, but I left an explanation for a somewhat mysterious quirk in the THIR lowering of user type annotations for patterns having to do with ctors and their `type_of` not actually being the type of the pattern node it's ascribing.
Fixes#138048
r? ``@BoxyUwU``
Do not feed anon const a type that references generics that it does not have
Fixes#137865
See the comment I left in the code. We could alternatively give these anon consts the generics from the parent, but that would be moving in a GCE-esque direction that we may not want. Open to tweaks here.
r? BoxyUwU
Prevent ICE in autodiff validation by emitting user-friendly errors
This PR moves `valid_ret_activity` and `valid_input_activity` checks to the macro expansion phase in compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs, replacing the following internal compiler error (ICE):
```
error: internal compiler error:
compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/codegen_attrs.rs:935:13:
Invalid input activity Dual for Reverse mode
```
with a more user-friendly message.
The issue specifically affected the test file `tests/ui/autodiff/autodiff_illegal.rs`, impacting the functions `f5` and `f6`.
The ICE can be reproduced by following [Enzyme's Rustbook](https://enzymead.github.io/rustbook/installation.html) installation guide.
Additionally, this PR adds tests for invalid return activity in `autodiff_illegal.rs`, which previously triggered an unnoticed ICE before these fixes.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Allow int literals for pattern types with int base types
r? ``@BoxyUwU``
I also added an error at layout computation time for layouts that contain wrapping ranges (happens at monomorphization time). This is obviously hacky, but at least prevents such types from making it to codegen for now. It made writing the tests for int literals easier as I didn't have to think about that edge case
Basically this PR allows you to stop using transmutes for creating pattern types and instead just use literals:
```rust
let x: pattern_type!(u32 is 5..10) = 7;
```
works, and if the literal is out of range you get a type mismatch because it just stays at the base type and the base type can't be coerced to the pattern type.
cc ``@joshtriplett`` ``@scottmcm``
Add `#[define_opaques]` attribute and require it for all type-alias-impl-trait sites that register a hidden type
Instead of relying on the signature of items to decide whether they are constraining an opaque type, the opaque types that the item constrains must be explicitly listed.
A previous version of this PR used an actual attribute, but had to keep the resolved `DefId`s in a side table.
Now we just lower to fields in the AST that have no surface syntax, instead a builtin attribute macro fills in those fields where applicable.
Note that for convenience referencing opaque types in associated types from associated methods on the same impl will not require an attribute. If that causes problems `#[defines()]` can be used to overwrite the default of searching for opaques in the signature.
One wart of this design is that closures and static items do not have generics. So since I stored the opaques in the generics of functions, consts and methods, I would need to add a custom field to closures and statics to track this information. During a T-types discussion we decided to just not do this for now.
fixes#131298
When migrating the standard library to 2024, there will be some behavior
changes that users will be able to observe. This test should cover that
(I cannot think of any other observable differences).
Improve `-Zunpretty=hir` for parsed attrs
0. Rename `print_something` to `should_render` to make it distinct from `print_attribute` in that it doesn't print anything, it's just a way to probe if a type renders anything.
1. Fixes a few bugs in the `PrintAttribute` derive. Namely, the `__printed_anything` variable was entangled with the `should_render` call, leading us to always render field names but never render commas.
2. Remove the outermost `""` from the attr.
3. Debug print `Symbol`s. I know that this is redundant for some parsed attributes, but there's no good way to distinguish symbols that are ident-like and symbols which are cooked string literals. We could perhaps *conditionally* to fall back to a debug printing if the symbol doesn't match an ident? But seems like overkill.
Based on #138060, only review the commits not in that one.
[AIX] Fix hangs during testing
Fixes all current test hangs experienced during CI runs.
1. ipv6 link-local (the loopback device) gets assigned an automatic zone id of 1, causing the assert to fail and hang in `library/std/src/net/udp/tests.rs`
2. Const alloc does not fail gracefully
3. Debuginfo test has problem with gdb auto load safe path
Support for `wasm32-wali-linux-musl` Tier-3 target
Adding a new target -- `wasm32-wali-linux-musl` -- to the compiler can target the [WebAssembly Linux Interface](https://github.com/arjunr2/WALI) according to MCP rust-lang/compiler-team#797
Preliminary support involves minimal changes, primarily
* A new target spec for `wasm32_wali_linux_musl` that bridges linux options with supported wasm options. Right now, since there is no canonical Linux ABI for Wasm, we use `wali` in the vendor field, but this can be migrated in future version.
* Dependency patches to the following crates are required and these crates can be updated to bring target support:
- **stdarch** rust-lang/stdarch#1702
- **libc** rust-lang/libc#4244
- **cc** rust-lang/cc-rs#1373
* Minimal additions for FFI support
cc `@tgross35` for libc-related changes
Tier-3 policy:
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will take responsibility for maintaining this target as well as issues
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
The target name is consistent with naming patterns from currently supported targets for arch (wasm32), OS, (linux) and env (musl)
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
No naming confusion is introduced.
> If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
Compliant
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
It's fully open source
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities. Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Noted
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
Compliant
> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
All tools are open-source
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
No terms present
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
I am not a reviewer
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This target supports the full standard library with appropriate configuration stubs where necessary (however, similar to all existing wasm32 targets, it excludes dynamic linking or hardware-specific features)
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Preliminary documentation is provided at https://github.com/arjunr2/WALI. Further detailed docs (if necessary) can be added once this PR lands
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Understood
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
To the best of my knowledge, it does not break any existing target in the ecosystem -- only minimal configuration-specific additions were made to support the target.
> Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
We can upstream LLVM target support
