Invert the order that we pass the arguments to the
`contract_check_ensures` function to avoid the warning when the tail
of the function is unreachable.
Note that the call itself is also unreachable, but we have already
handled that case by ignoring unreachable call for contract calls.
Use `const_eval_select!()` macro to enable contract checking only at
runtime. The existing contract logic relies on closures,
which are not supported in constant functions.
This commit also removes one level of indirection for ensures clauses,
however, it currently has a spurious warning message when the bottom
of the function is unreachable.
slice: Remove some uses of unsafe in first/last chunk methods
Remove unsafe `split_at_unchecked` and `split_at_mut_unchecked` in some slice `split_first_chunk`/`split_last_chunk` methods.
Replace those calls with the safe `split_at` and `split_at_checked` where applicable.
Add codegen tests to check for no panics when calculating the last chunk index using `checked_sub` and `split_at`.
Better viewed with whitespace disabled in diff view
---
The unchecked calls are mostly manual implementations of the safe methods, but with the safety condition negated from `mid <= len` to `len < mid`.
```rust
if self.len() < N {
None
} else {
// SAFETY: We manually verified the bounds of the split.
let (first, tail) = unsafe { self.split_at_unchecked(N) };
// Or for the last_chunk methods
let (init, last) = unsafe { self.split_at_unchecked(self.len() - N) };
```
Unsafe is still needed for the pointer array casts. Their safety comments are unmodified.
Remove mention of `exhaustive_patterns` from `never` docs
The example shows an exhaustive match:
```rust
#![feature(exhaustive_patterns)]
use std::str::FromStr;
let Ok(s) = String::from_str("hello");
```
But https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119612 moved this functionality to `#![feature(min_exhaustive_patterns)` and then stabilized it.
Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented
The use on the SliceIndex impl appears unreachable, there is no mention of "vector indices" in any test output and I could not get it to show up in error messages.
Simplify expansion for format_args!().
Instead of calling `Placeholder::new()`, we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
```rust
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
```
After:
```rust
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
```
(I originally avoided the struct expression, because `Placeholder` had a lot of fields. But now that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136974 is merged, it only has four fields left.)
This will make the `fmt` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` a candidate for const promotion, which is important if we ever hope to tackle https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92698 (It doesn't change anything yet though, because the `args` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` is not const-promotable.)
Remove unsafe `split_at_unchecked` and `split_at_mut_unchecked`
in some slice `split_first_chunk`/`split_last_chunk` methods.
Replace those calls with the safe `split_at` and `split_at_checked` where
applicable.
Add codegen tests to check for no panics when calculating the last
chunk index using `checked_sub` and `split_at`
Instead of calling new(), we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
After:
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
stabilize const_cell
``@rust-lang/libs-api`` ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`` I see no reason to wait any longer, so I propose we stabilize the use of `Cell` in `const fn` -- specifically the APIs listed here:
```rust
// core::cell
impl<T> Cell<T> {
pub const fn replace(&self, val: T) -> T;
}
impl<T: Copy> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get(&self) -> T;
}
impl<T: ?Sized> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get_mut(&mut self) -> &mut T;
pub const fn from_mut(t: &mut T) -> &Cell<T>;
}
impl<T> Cell<[T]> {
pub const fn as_slice_of_cells(&self) -> &[Cell<T>];
}
```
Unfortunately, `set` cannot be made `const fn` yet as it drops the old contents.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131283
Override PartialOrd methods for bool
I noticed that `PartialOrd` implementation for `bool` does not override the individual operator methods, unlike the other primitive types like `char` and integers.
This commit extracts these `PartialOrd` overrides shared by the other primitive types into a macro and calls it on `bool` too.
CC `@scottmcm` for our recent adventures in `PartialOrd` land
I noticed that `PartialOrd` implementation for `bool` does not override the
individual operator methods, unlike the other primitive types like `char`
and integers.
This commit extracts these `PartialOrd` overrides shared by the other
primitive types into a macro and calls it on `bool` too.
Simplify `PartialOrd` on tuples containing primitives
We noticed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133984#issuecomment-2704011800 that currently the tuple comparison code, while it [does optimize down](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/comparison-operators-2-tuple.rs) today, is kinda huge: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/xqMoeYbhE>
This PR changes the tuple code to go through an overridable "chaining" version of the comparison functions, so that for simple things like `(i16, u16)` and `(f32, f32)` (as seen in the new MIR pre-codegen test) we just directly get the
```rust
if lhs.0 == rhs.0 { lhs.0 OP rhs.0 }
else { lhs.1 OP rhs.1 }
```
version in MIR, rather than emitting a mess for LLVM to have to clean up.
Test added in the first commit, so you can see the MIR diff in the second one.
core: optimize `RepeatN`
...by adding an optimized implementation of `try_fold` and `fold` as well as replacing some unnecessary `mem::replace` calls with `MaybeUninit` helper methods.
...by adding an optimized implementation of `try_fold` and `fold` as well as replacing some unnecessary `mem::replace` calls with `MaybeUninit` helper methods.
Reduce FormattingOptions to 64 bits
This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012
This reduces FormattingOptions from 6-7 machine words (384 bits on 64-bit platforms, 224 bits on 32-bit platforms) to just 64 bits (a single register on 64-bit platforms).
Before:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
flags: u32, // only 6 bits used
fill: char,
align: Option<Alignment>,
width: Option<usize>,
precision: Option<usize>,
}
```
After:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
/// Bits:
/// - 0-20: fill character (21 bits, a full `char`)
/// - 21: `+` flag
/// - 22: `-` flag
/// - 23: `#` flag
/// - 24: `0` flag
/// - 25: `x?` flag
/// - 26: `X?` flag
/// - 27: Width flag (if set, the width field below is used)
/// - 28: Precision flag (if set, the precision field below is used)
/// - 29-30: Alignment (0: Left, 1: Right, 2: Center, 3: Unknown)
/// - 31: Always set to 1
flags: u32,
/// Width if width flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
width: u16,
/// Precision if precision flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
precision: u16,
}
```
Add an attribute that makes the spans from a macro edition 2021, and fix pin on edition 2024 with it
Fixes a regression, see issue below. This is a temporary fix, super let is the real solution.
Closes#138596
This commit adds the 5f00::/16 range defined by RFC9602 to those ranges which Ipv6Addr::is_global recognises as a non-global IP. This range is used for Segment Routing (SRv6) SIDs.
Optimize `io::Write::write_fmt` for constant strings
When the formatting args to `fmt::Write::write_fmt` are a statically known string, it simplifies to only calling `write_str` without a runtime branch. Do the same in `io::Write::write_fmt` with `write_all`.
Also, match the convention of `fmt::Write` for the name of `args`.
`MaybeUninit` inherent slice methods part 2
These were moved out of #129259 since they require additional libs-api approval. Tracking issue: #117428.
New API surface:
```rust
impl<T> [MaybeUninit<T>] {
// replacing fill; renamed to avoid conflict
pub fn write_filled(&mut self, value: T) -> &mut [T] where T: Clone;
// replacing fill_with; renamed to avoid conflict
pub fn write_with<F>(&mut self, value: F) -> &mut [T] where F: FnMut() -> T;
// renamed to remove "fill" terminology, since this is closer to the write_*_of_slice methods
pub fn write_iter<I>(&mut self, iter: I) -> (&mut [T], &mut Self) where I: Iterator<Item = T>;
}
```
Relevant motivation for these methods; see #129259 for earlier methods' motiviations.
* I chose `write_filled` since `filled` is being used as an object here, whereas it's being used as an action in `fill`.
* I chose `write_with` instead of `write_filled_with` since it's shorter and still matches well.
* I chose `write_iter` because it feels completely different from the fill methods, and still has the intent clear.
In all of the methods, it felt appropriate to ensure that they contained `write` to clarify that they are effectively just special ways of doing `MaybeUninit::write` for each element of a slice.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117428
r? libs-api
When the formatting args to `fmt::Write::write_fmt` are a statically
known string, it simplifies to only calling `write_str` without a
runtime branch. Do the same in `io::Write::write_fmt` with `write_all`.
Also, match the convention of `fmt::Write` for the name of `args`.
Denote `ControlFlow` as `#[must_use]`
I've repeatedly hit bugs in the compiler due to `ControlFlow` not being marked `#[must_use]`. There seems to be an accepted ACP to make the type `#[must_use]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/444), so this PR implements that part of it.
Most of the usages in the compiler that trigger this new warning are "root" usages (calling into an API that uses control-flow internally, but for which the callee doesn't really care) and have been suppressed by `let _ = ...`, but I did legitimately find one instance of a missing `?` and one for a never-used `ControlFlow` value in #137448.
Presumably this needs an FCP too, so I'm opening this and nominating it for T-libs-api.
This PR also touches the tools (incl. rust-analyzer), but if this went into FCP, I'd split those out into separate PRs which can land before this one does.
r? libs-api
`@rustbot` label: T-libs-api I-libs-api-nominated
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136293 (document capacity for ZST as example)
- #136359 (doc all differences of ptr:copy(_nonoverlapping) with memcpy and memmove)
- #136816 (refactor `notable_traits_button` to use iterator combinators instead of for loop)
- #138552 (Misc print request handling cleanups + a centralized test for print request stability gating)
- #138573 (Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `From<{integer}>` for `f16`/`f128` impls
This PR adds `impl From<{bool,i8,u8}> for f16` and `impl From<{bool,i8,u8,i16,u16,i32,u32}> for f128`.
The `From<{i64,u64}> for f128` impls are left commented out as adding them would allow using `f128` on stable before it is stabilised like in the following example:
```rust
fn f<T: From<u64>>(x: T) -> T { x }
fn main() {
let x = f(1.0); // the type of the literal is inferred to be `f128`
}
```
None of the impls added in this PR have this issue as they are all, at minimum, also implemented by `f64`.
This PR will need a crater run for the `From<{i32,u32}>` impls, as `f64` is no longer the only float type to implement them (similar to the cause of #125198).
cc `@bjoernager`
r? `@tgross35`
Tracking issue: #116909
