Add regression test for #70155.
With #70166 merged, `RangeInclusive` now derives `PartialEq` and `Eq`, implementing structural equality and as a side effect the range is now usable with const generics, closing #70155.
As per [#70166 (comment)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70166#issuecomment-601872201) a test is added to avoid a change to the private fields or the equality implementation of the range from subtly reverting #70155.
In addition to the regression test of `RangeInclusive` for #70155, now all range types are checked for usability within const generics:
- `RangeFrom`
- `RangeFull`
- `RangeToInclusive`
- `RangeTo`
- `Range`
The test are moved from `test\ui\const-generics\issues\issue-70155` to `test\ui\const-generics\std\range` in anticipation of future similar tests for std types.
With #70166 merged, `RangeInclusive` now derives `PartialEq` and `Eq`, implementing structural equality and as a side effect the range is now usable with const generics, closing #70155.
A test is added to avoid a change to the private fields or the equality implementation of the range from subtly reverting #70155.
* Add a new method `has_infer_types_or_consts` that's used instead most
of the time, since there's generally no reason to only consider types.
* Remove use of `has_closure_types`, because closures are no longer
implicitly linked to the `InferCtxt`.
Address inconsistency in using "is" with "declared here"
"is" was generally used for NLL diagnostics, but not other diagnostics. Using "is" makes the diagnostics sound more natural and readable, so it seems sensible to commit to them throughout.
r? @Centril
`TooGeneric` is encountered during WF checking when we cannot determine that a constant involving a generic parameter will always be evaluated successfully (rather than resulting in an error). In these cases, the burden of proof should be with the caller, so that we can avoid post-monomorphisation tim errors (which was the previous previous behaviour). This commit ensures that this situation produces a proper compiler error, rather than silently ignoring it or ICEing.
