overhaul exit codes for rustc and rustdoc
This commit changes the exit status of rustc to 1 in the presence of
compilation errors. In the event of an unexpected panic (ICE) the
standard panic error exit status of 101 remains.
A run-make test is added to ensure that the exit code does not regress,
and compiletest is updated to check for an exit status of 1 or 101,
depending on the mode and suite.
This is a breaking change for custom drivers.
Note that while changes were made to the rustdoc binary, there is no
intended behavior change. rustdoc errors (i.e., failed lints) will still
report 101. While this could *also* hide potential ICEs, I will leave
that work to a future PR.
Fixes#51971.
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #51628 (use checked write in `LineWriter` example)
- #52116 (Handle array manually in str case conversion methods)
- #52218 (Amend option.take examples)
- #52418 (Do not use desugared ident when suggesting adding a type)
- #52439 (Revert some changes from #51917 to fix custom libdir)
- #52455 (Fix doc comment: use `?` instead of `.unwrap()`)
- #52458 (rustc: Fix a suggestion for the `proc_macro` feature)
- #52464 (Allow clippy to be installed with make install)
- #52472 (rustc: Enable `use_extern_macros` in 2018 edition)
- #52477 (Clarify short-circuiting behvaior of Iterator::zip.)
- #52480 (Cleanup #24958)
- #52487 (Don't build twice the sanitizers on Linux)
- #52510 (rustdoc: remove FIXME about macro redirects)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
This commit changes the exit status of rustc to 1 in the presence of
compilation errors. In the event of an unexpected panic (ICE) the
standard panic error exit status of 101 remains.
A run-make test is added to ensure that the exit code does not regress,
and compiletest is updated to check for an exit status of 1 or 101,
depending on the mode and suite.
This is a breaking change for custom drivers.
Fixes#51971.
rustc: Use link_section, not wasm_custom_section
This commit transitions definitions of custom sections on the wasm target from
the unstable `#[wasm_custom_section]` attribute to the
already-stable-for-other-targets `#[link_section]` attribute. Mostly the same
restrictions apply as before, except that this now applies only to statics.
Closes#51088
rustc: Stabilize the `proc_macro` feature
This commit stabilizes some of the `proc_macro` language feature as well as a
number of APIs in the `proc_macro` crate as [previously discussed][1]. This
means that on stable Rust you can now define custom procedural macros which
operate as attributes attached to items or `macro_rules!`-like bang-style
invocations. This extends the suite of currently stable procedural macros,
custom derives, with custom attributes and custom bang macros.
Note though that despite the stabilization in this commit procedural macros are
still not usable on stable Rust. To stabilize that we'll need to stabilize at
least part of the `use_extern_macros` feature. Currently you can define a
procedural macro attribute but you can't import it to call it!
A summary of the changes made in this PR (as well as the various consequences)
is:
* The `proc_macro` language and library features are now stable.
* Other APIs not stabilized in the `proc_macro` crate are now named under a
different feature, such as `proc_macro_diagnostic` or `proc_macro_span`.
* A few checks in resolution for `proc_macro` being enabled have switched over
to `use_extern_macros` being enabled. This means that code using
`#![feature(proc_macro)]` today will likely need to move to
`#![feature(use_extern_macros)]`.
It's intended that this PR, once landed, will be followed up with an attempt to
stabilize a small slice of `use_extern_macros` just for procedural macros to
make this feature 100% usable on stable.
[1]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/help-stabilize-a-subset-of-macros-2-0/7252
This commit transitions definitions of custom sections on the wasm target from
the unstable `#[wasm_custom_section]` attribute to the
already-stable-for-other-targets `#[link_section]` attribute. Mostly the same
restrictions apply as before, except that this now applies only to statics.
Closes#51088
This commit stabilizes some of the `proc_macro` language feature as well as a
number of APIs in the `proc_macro` crate as [previously discussed][1]. This
means that on stable Rust you can now define custom procedural macros which
operate as attributes attached to items or `macro_rules!`-like bang-style
invocations. This extends the suite of currently stable procedural macros,
custom derives, with custom attributes and custom bang macros.
Note though that despite the stabilization in this commit procedural macros are
still not usable on stable Rust. To stabilize that we'll need to stabilize at
least part of the `use_extern_macros` feature. Currently you can define a
procedural macro attribute but you can't import it to call it!
A summary of the changes made in this PR (as well as the various consequences)
is:
* The `proc_macro` language and library features are now stable.
* Other APIs not stabilized in the `proc_macro` crate are now named under a
different feature, such as `proc_macro_diagnostic` or `proc_macro_span`.
* A few checks in resolution for `proc_macro` being enabled have switched over
to `use_extern_macros` being enabled. This means that code using
`#![feature(proc_macro)]` today will likely need to move to
`#![feature(use_extern_macros)]`.
It's intended that this PR, once landed, will be followed up with an attempt to
stabilize a small slice of `use_extern_macros` just for procedural macros to
make this feature 100% usable on stable.
[1]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/help-stabilize-a-subset-of-macros-2-0/7252
CTFE: use binary_op to compare integer with match disriminant
This is needed to unblock https://github.com/solson/miri/pull/401: There is code in the Windows initialization functions that uses `match` to test whether a pointer is NULL.
I will add a testcase in miri; I was not sure where to add a testcase in Rust itself.
r? @oli-obk
resolve: Functions introducing procedural macros reserve a slot in the macro namespace as well
Similarly to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52234, this gives us symmetry between internal and external views of a crate, but in this case it's always an error to call a procedural macro in the same crate in which it's defined.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52225
rustdoc: don't panic when the cross-re-export handler sees a proc-macro
When i moved the macro cross-re-export inlining code into `clean::inline`, i thought that if a macro had a `Def` that said it was a bang macro, it wouldn't be a proc macro. I thought wrong. Turns out, the `quote!()` in `libproc_macro` is actually a proc-macro, and when the `quote!()` macro is re-exported, this proc-macro is accessed in its place. This causes any `proc_macro::*` glob re-export to pull in this proc-macro, causing the assertion i added to fire, leading to an ICE. This replaces that with an Option that ignores proc-macros for the time being.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52129
