Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #70644 (Clean up `ModuleConfig` initialization)
- #70937 (Fix staticlib name for *-pc-windows-gnu targets)
- #70996 (Add or_insert_with_key to Entry of HashMap/BTreeMap)
- #71020 (Store UNICODE_VERSION as a tuple)
- #71021 (Use write!-style syntax for MIR assert terminator)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Store UNICODE_VERSION as a tuple
Remove the UnicodeVersion struct containing
major, minor and update fields and replace it with
a 3-tuple containing the version number.
As the value of each field is limited to 255
use u8 to store them.
Remove the UnicodeVersion struct containing
major, minor and update fields and replace it with
a 3-tuple containing the version number.
As the value of each field is limited to 255
use u8 to store them.
tests encoding current behavior for various cases of "binding" to _.
The `_` binding form is special, in that it encodes a "no-op": nothing is actually bound, and thus nothing is moved or borrowed in this scenario. Usually we do the "right" thing in all such cases. The exceptions are explicitly pointed out in this test case, so that we keep track of whether they are eventually fixed.
Cc #53114.
(This does not close the aforementioned issue; it just adds the tests encoding the current behavior, which we hope to eventually fix.)
Normalize function signature in function casting check procedure
Fixes#54094
```rust
trait Zoo {
type X;
}
impl Zoo for u16 {
type X = usize;
}
fn foo(abc: <u16 as Zoo>::X) {}
fn main() {
let x: *const u8 = foo as _;
}
```
Currently a `FnDef` need to be checked if it's able to cast to `FnPtr` before it is actually casted. But the signature of `FnPtr` target's associated types are not normalized:
96d77f0e5f/src/librustc_typeck/check/cast.rs (L536-L553)
However, during the coercion check, the signature of `FnPtr` target's associated types are normalized (The `<u16 as Zoo>::X` turns into `usize`).
96d77f0e5f/src/librustc_typeck/check/coercion.rs (L687-L729)
This inconsistency leads to the error:`Err(Sorts(ExpectedFound { expected: <u16 as Zoo>::X, found: usize }))`.
tests encoding current behavior for various cases of "binding" to _.
The `_` binding form is special, in that it encodes a "no-op": nothing is actually bound, and thus nothing is moved or borrowed in this scenario. Usually we do the "right" thing in all such cases. The exceptions are explicitly pointed out in this test case, so that we keep track of whether they are eventually fixed.
Cc #53114.
(This does not close the aforementioned issue; it just adds the tests encoding the current behavior, which we hope to eventually fix.)
Use `PredicateObligation`s instead of `Predicate`s
Keep more information about trait binding failures. Use more specific spans by pointing at bindings that introduce obligations.
Subset of #69709.
r? @eddyb
Stop explicitly depending on python 2
This PR revises our previous policy of officially only supporting and testing with python 2 in the CI environment to instead test with python 3. It also changes the defaults to python 3 in our various scripts (usually, by way of `python` rather than `python3` to preserve compatibility with systems that do not have a python 3 available).
The effect of this is that we expect all new patches to support python 3 (and will test as such). We explicitly also expect that patches support python 2.7 as well -- and test as such, though only on one builder. This is intended as a temporary, though likely long-lived, measure to preserve compatibility while looking towards the future which is likely to be a python 3 only world. We do not at this point set a timeline for when we'll drop support for python 2.7; it's plausible that this is months or years into the future, depending on how quickly the ecosystem drops support and how painful it is for us to maintain that support over time.
Closes#65063 (as far as I can tell; please file explicit and separate issues or PRs if not).
The `_` binding form is special, in that it encodes a "no-op": nothing is
actually bound, and thus nothing is moved or borrowed in this scenario. Usually
we do the "right" thing in all such cases. The exceptions are explicitly pointed
out in this test case, so that we keep track of whether they are eventually
fixed.
Replace "rc"/"arc" lang items with Rc/Arc diagnostic items.
`Rc`/`Arc` should have no special semantics, so it seems appropriate for them to not be lang items.
r? @matthewjasper
rustc_session: forbid lints override regardless of position
Addresses the regression reported in #70819 for command line arguments, but does not address the source code flag regression.
Support `#[track_caller]` on functions in `extern "Rust" { ... }`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70830 which is the follow-up to @eddyb's suggestion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69251#discussion_r380791634 to allow `#[track_caller]` on `fn`s in FFI imports, that is, on functions in `extern "Rust" { ... }` blocks.
This requires that the other side, the FFI export, also have the `#[track_caller]` attribute. Otherwise, undefined behavior is triggered and the blame lies, as usual, with the `unsafe { ... }` block which called the FFI imported function.
After this PR, all forms of `fn` items with the right ABI (`"Rust"`) support `#[track_caller]`.
As a drive-by, the PR also hardens the check rejecting `#[naked] #[track_caller]` such that methods and other forms of `fn` items are also considered.
r? @eddyb
cc @rust-lang/lang
save/restore `pessimistic_yield` when entering bodies
This flag is used to make the execution order around `+=` operators
pessimistic. Failure to save/restore the flag was causing independent
async blocks to effect one another, leading to strange ICEs and failed
assumptions.
Fixes#69307
r? @Zoxc
