Fix ICE for mismatched args on target without span
Commit 7ed00caacc improved our error reporting by including the target function in our error messages when there is an argument count mismatch. A simple example from the UI tests is:
```
error[E0593]: function is expected to take a single 2-tuple as argument, but it takes 0 arguments
--> $DIR/closure-arg-count.rs:32:53
|
32 | let _it = vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().enumerate().map(foo);
| ^^^ expected function that takes a single 2-tuple as argument
...
44 | fn foo() {}
| -------- takes 0 arguments
```
However, this assumed the target span was always available. This does not hold true if the target function is in `std` or another crate. A simple example from #48046 is assigning `str::split` to a function type with a different number of arguments.
Fix by omitting all of the labels and suggestions related to the target span when it's not found.
Fixes#48046
r? @estebank
rustc: Upgrade to LLVM 6
The following submodules have been updated for a new version of LLVM:
- `src/llvm`
- `src/libcompiler_builtins` - transitively contains compiler-rt
- `src/dlmalloc`
This also updates the docker container for dist-i686-freebsd as the old 16.04
container is no longer capable of building LLVM. The
compiler-rt/compiler-builtins and dlmalloc updates are pretty routine without
much interesting happening, but the LLVM update here is of particular note.
Unlike previous updates I haven't cherry-picked all existing patches we had on
top of our LLVM branch as we have a [huge amount][patches4] and have at this
point forgotten what most of them are for. Instead I started from the current
`release_60` branch in LLVM and only applied patches that were necessary to get
our tests working and building.
The [current set of custom rustc-specific patches](https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/compare/f1286127b73c0d81ced8595af62e78ed703ced8b...rust-llvm-release-6-0-0) included in this LLVM update are:
* rust-lang/llvm@1187443 - this is how we actually implement
`cfg(target_feature)` for now and continues to not be upstreamed. While a
hazard for SIMD stabilization this commit is otherwise keeping the status
quo of a small rustc-specific feature.
* rust-lang/llvm@013f2ec - this is a rustc-specific optimization that we haven't
upstreamed, notably teaching LLVM about our allocation-related routines (which
aren't malloc/free). Once we stabilize the global allocator routines we will
likely want to upstream this patch, but for now it seems reasonable to keep it
on our fork.
* rust-lang/llvm@a65bbfd - I found this necessary to fix compilation of LLVM in
our 32-bit linux container. I'm not really sure why it's necessary but my
guess is that it's because of the absolutely ancient glibc that we're using.
In any case it's only updating pieces we're not actually using in LLVM so I'm
hoping it'll turn out alright. This doesn't seem like something we'll want to
upstream.c
* rust-lang/llvm@77ab1f0 - this is what's actually enabling LLVM to build in our
i686-freebsd container, I'm not really sure what's going on but we for sure
probably don't want to upstream this and otherwise it seems not too bad for
now at least.
* rust-lang/llvm@9eb9267 - we currently suffer on MSVC from an [upstream bug]
which although diagnosed to a particular revision isn't currently fixed
upstream (and the bug itself doesn't seem too active). This commit is a
partial revert of the suspected cause of this regression (found via a
bisection). I'm sort of hoping that this eventually gets fixed upstream with a
similar fix (which we can replace in our branch), but for now I'm also hoping
it's a relatively harmless change to have.
After applying these patches (plus one [backport] which should be [backported
upstream][llvm-back]) I believe we should have all tests working on all
platforms in our current test suite. I'm like 99% sure that we'll need some more
backports as issues are reported for LLVM 6 when this propagates through
nightlies, but that's sort of just par for the course nowadays!
In any case though some extra scrutiny of the patches here would definitely be
welcome, along with scrutiny of the "missing patches" like a [change to pass
manager order](rust-lang/llvm@2717444), [another change to pass manager
order](rust-lang/llvm@c782feb), some [compile fixes for
sparc](rust-lang/llvm@1a83de6), and some [fixes for
solaris](rust-lang/llvm@c2bfe0a).
[patches4]: rust-lang/llvm@5401fdf...rust-llvm-release-4-0-1
[backport]: rust-lang/llvm@5c54c25
[llvm-back]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36114
[upstream bug]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36096
---
The update to LLVM 6 is desirable for a number of reasons, notably:
* This'll allow us to keep up with the upstream wasm backend, picking up new
features as they start landing.
* Upstream LLVM has fixed a number of SIMD-related compilation errors,
especially around AVX-512 and such.
* There's a few assorted known bugs which are fixed in LLVM 5 and aren't fixed
in the LLVM 4 branch we're using.
* Overall it's not a great idea to stagnate with our codegen backend!
This update is mostly powered by #47730 which is allowing us to update LLVM
*independent* of the version of LLVM that Emscripten is locked to. This means
that when compiling code for Emscripten we'll still be using the old LLVM 4
backend, but when compiling code for any other target we'll be using the new
LLVM 6 target. Once Emscripten updates we may no longer need this distinction,
but we're not sure when that will happen!
Closes#43370Closes#43418Closes#47015Closes#47683Closesrust-lang-nursery/stdsimd#157Closesrust-lang-nursery/rust-wasm#3
The following submodules have been updated for a new version of LLVM:
- `src/llvm`
- `src/libcompiler_builtins` - transitively contains compiler-rt
- `src/dlmalloc`
This also updates the docker container for dist-i686-freebsd as the old 16.04
container is no longer capable of building LLVM. The
compiler-rt/compiler-builtins and dlmalloc updates are pretty routine without
much interesting happening, but the LLVM update here is of particular note.
Unlike previous updates I haven't cherry-picked all existing patches we had on
top of our LLVM branch as we have a [huge amount][patches4] and have at this
point forgotten what most of them are for. Instead I started from the current
`release_60` branch in LLVM and only applied patches that were necessary to get
our tests working and building.
The current set of custom rustc-specific patches included in this LLVM update are:
* rust-lang/llvm@1187443 - this is how we actually implement
`cfg(target_feature)` for now and continues to not be upstreamed. While a
hazard for SIMD stabilization this commit is otherwise keeping the status
quo of a small rustc-specific feature.
* rust-lang/llvm@013f2ec - this is a rustc-specific optimization that we haven't
upstreamed, notably teaching LLVM about our allocation-related routines (which
aren't malloc/free). Once we stabilize the global allocator routines we will
likely want to upstream this patch, but for now it seems reasonable to keep it
on our fork.
* rust-lang/llvm@a65bbfd - I found this necessary to fix compilation of LLVM in
our 32-bit linux container. I'm not really sure why it's necessary but my
guess is that it's because of the absolutely ancient glibc that we're using.
In any case it's only updating pieces we're not actually using in LLVM so I'm
hoping it'll turn out alright. This doesn't seem like something we'll want to
upstream.c
* rust-lang/llvm@77ab1f0 - this is what's actually enabling LLVM to build in our
i686-freebsd container, I'm not really sure what's going on but we for sure
probably don't want to upstream this and otherwise it seems not too bad for
now at least.
* rust-lang/llvm@9eb9267 - we currently suffer on MSVC from an [upstream bug]
which although diagnosed to a particular revision isn't currently fixed
upstream (and the bug itself doesn't seem too active). This commit is a
partial revert of the suspected cause of this regression (found via a
bisection). I'm sort of hoping that this eventually gets fixed upstream with a
similar fix (which we can replace in our branch), but for now I'm also hoping
it's a relatively harmless change to have.
After applying these patches (plus one [backport] which should be [backported
upstream][llvm-back]) I believe we should have all tests working on all
platforms in our current test suite. I'm like 99% sure that we'll need some more
backports as issues are reported for LLVM 6 when this propagates through
nightlies, but that's sort of just par for the course nowadays!
In any case though some extra scrutiny of the patches here would definitely be
welcome, along with scrutiny of the "missing patches" like a [change to pass
manager order](rust-lang/llvm@2717444753), [another change to pass manager
order](rust-lang/llvm@c782febb7b), some [compile fixes for
sparc](rust-lang/llvm@1a83de63c4), and some [fixes for
solaris](rust-lang/llvm@c2bfe0abb).
[patches4]: https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/compare/5401fdf23...rust-llvm-release-4-0-1
[backport]: 5c54c252db
[llvm-back]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36114
[upstream bug]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36096
---
The update to LLVM 6 is desirable for a number of reasons, notably:
* This'll allow us to keep up with the upstream wasm backend, picking up new
features as they start landing.
* Upstream LLVM has fixed a number of SIMD-related compilation errors,
especially around AVX-512 and such.
* There's a few assorted known bugs which are fixed in LLVM 5 and aren't fixed
in the LLVM 4 branch we're using.
* Overall it's not a great idea to stagnate with our codegen backend!
This update is mostly powered by #47730 which is allowing us to update LLVM
*independent* of the version of LLVM that Emscripten is locked to. This means
that when compiling code for Emscripten we'll still be using the old LLVM 4
backend, but when compiling code for any other target we'll be using the new
LLVM 6 target. Once Emscripten updates we may no longer need this distinction,
but we're not sure when that will happen!
Closes#43370Closes#43418Closes#47015Closes#47683Closesrust-lang-nursery/stdsimd#157Closesrust-lang-nursery/rust-wasm#3
[NLL] Add false edges out of infinite loops
Resolves#46036 by adding a `cleanup` member to the `FalseEdges` terminator kind. There's also a small doc fix to one of the other comments in `into.rs` which I can pull out in to another PR if desired =)
This PR should pass CI but the test suite has been relatively unstable on my system so I'm not 100% sure.
r? @nikomatsakis
NLL: Limit two-phase borrows to autoref-introduced borrows
This imposes a restriction on two-phase borrows so that it only applies to autoref-introduced borrows.
The goal is to ensure that our initial deployment of two-phase borrows is very conservative. We want it to still cover the `v.push(v.len());` example, but we do not want it to cover cases like `let imm = &v; let mu = &mut v; mu.push(imm.len());`
(Why do we want it to be conservative? Because when you are not conservative, then the results you get, at least with the current analysis, are tightly coupled to details of the MIR construction that we would rather remain invisible to the end user.)
Fix#46747
I decided, for this PR, to add a debug-flag `-Z two-phase-beyond-autoref`, to re-enable the more general approach. But my intention here is *not* that we would eventually turn on that debugflag by default; the main reason I added it was that I thought it was useful for writing tests to be able to write source that looks like desugared MIR.
Added `-Z two-phase-beyond-autoref` to bring back old behavior (mainly
to allow demonstration of desugared examples).
Updated tests to use aforementioned flag when necessary. (But in each
case where I added the flag, I made sure to also include a revision
without the flag so that one can readily see what the actual behavior
we expect is for the initial deployment of NLL.)
Fixes the hash test to recognize that MirValidated can change when changing
around labels, and add a new test that makes sure we're lowering loop statements
correctly.
As opposed to using weirdness involving pretending the body block
is the loop block. This does not pass tests
This commit is [ci skip] because I know it doesn't pass tests yet.
Somehow this commit introduces nondeterminism into the handling of
loops.
Warn about more ignored bounds in type aliases
It seems that all bounds in type aliases are entirely ignored, not just type bounds. This extends the warning appropriately.
I assume this should be made a hard error with the next epoch? I can't see any reason to accept these programs. (And suddenly enforcing these type bounds would be a breaking change.)
rustc: Add `#[rustc_args_required_const]`
This commit adds a new unstable attribute to the compiler which requires that
arguments to a function are always provided as constants. The primary use case
for this is SIMD intrinsics where arguments are defined by vendors to be
constant and in LLVM they indeed must be constant as well.
For now this is mostly just a semantic guarantee in rustc that an argument is a
constant when invoked, phases like trans don't actually take advantage of it
yet. This means that we'll be able to use this in stdsimd but we won't be able
to remove the `constify_*` macros just yet. Hopefully soon though!
Implement RFC 2052 (Epochs)
This adds -Zepochs and uses it for tyvar_behind_raw_pointer (#46906)
When we move this to --epoch=XXX, we'll need to gate the 2018 epoch on nightly, but not the 2015 one. I can make these changes here itself though it's kinda pointless given that the entire flag is nightly-only.
r? @nikomatsakis @aturon
cc #44581 (epoch tracking)
cc #46906 (tyvar_behind_raw_pointer)
Implement TrustedLen for Take<Repeat> and Take<RangeFrom>
This will allow optimization of simple `repeat(x).take(n).collect()` iterators, which are currently not vectorized and have capacity checks.
This will only support a few aggregates on `Repeat` and `RangeFrom`, which might be enough for simple cases, but doesn't optimize more complex ones. Namely, Cycle, StepBy, Filter, FilterMap, Peekable, SkipWhile, Skip, FlatMap, Fuse and Inspect are not marked `TrustedLen` when the inner iterator is infinite.
Previous discussion can be found in #47082
r? @alexcrichton
Add filtering options to `rustc_on_unimplemented`
- Add filtering options to `rustc_on_unimplemented` for local traits, filtering on `Self` and type arguments.
- Add a way to provide custom notes.
- Tweak binops text.
- Add filter to detect wether `Self` is local or belongs to another crate.
- Add filter to `Iterator` diagnostic for `&str`.
Partly addresses #44755 with a different syntax, as a first approach. Fixes#46216, fixes#37522, CC #34297, #46806.
[NLL] Improve DefiningTy::Const
Fixes#47590 by fixing the way DefiningTy represents constants. Previously, constants were represented using just the type of the variable. However, this will fail to capture early-bound regions as NLL inference vars, resulting in an ICE when we try to compute region VIDs a little bit later in the universal
region resolution process. (ref #47590)
Commit 7ed00caacc improved our error reporting by including the target
function in our error messages when there is an argument count mismatch.
A simple example from the UI tests is:
```
error[E0593]: function is expected to take a single 2-tuple as argument, but it takes 0 arguments
--> $DIR/closure-arg-count.rs:32:53
|
32 | let _it = vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().enumerate().map(foo);
| ^^^ expected function that takes a single 2-tuple as argument
...
44 | fn foo() {}
| -------- takes 0 arguments
```
However, this assumed the target span was always available. This does
not hold true if the target function is in `std` or another crate. A
simple example from #48046 is assigning `str::split` to a function type
with a different number of arguments.
Fix by removing all of the labels and suggestions related to the target
span when it's not found.
Fixes#48046
Fixes#47590 by fixing the way DefiningTy represents constants. Previously,
constants were represented using just the type of the variable. However, this
will fail to capture early-bound regions as NLL inference vars, resulting in an
ICE when we try to compute region VIDs a little bit later in the universal
region resolution process.
MIR-borrowck: augmented assignment causes duplicate errors
Fixes#45697. This PR resolves the error duplication. I attempted to replace the existing sets since there were quite a few but only managed to replace two of them.
r? @nikomatsakis
Warn when rustc output conflicts with existing directories
When the compiled executable would conflict with a directory, display a
rustc error instead of a verbose and potentially-confusing linker
error. This is a usability improvement, and doesn’t actually change
behaviour with regards to compilation success. This addresses the
concern in #35887. Fixes#13098.
Previously, when the type of a method receiver could not be determined,
the error message would, potentially confusingly, highlight the span of
the entire method call.
Resolves#36598, resolves#42234.
This commit adds a new unstable attribute to the compiler which requires that
arguments to a function are always provided as constants. The primary use case
for this is SIMD intrinsics where arguments are defined by vendors to be
constant and in LLVM they indeed must be constant as well.
For now this is mostly just a semantic guarantee in rustc that an argument is a
constant when invoked, phases like trans don't actually take advantage of it
yet. This means that we'll be able to use this in stdsimd but we won't be able
to remove the `constify_*` macros just yet. Hopefully soon though!
save-analysis: avoid implicit unwrap
When looking up a field defintion, since the name might be incorrect in the field init shorthand case.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rls/issues/699
r? @eddyb
add documentation from doc(include) to analysis data
cc #44732
Currently save-analysis only loads docs from plain doc comments and doc attributes. Since `#[doc(include="filename.md")]` doesn't create a plain doc attribute when it loads the file, we need to be sure to pick up this info for the analysis data.
Fix overflow when performing drop check calculations in NLL
Clearing out the infcx's region constraints after processing each type
ends up interacting badly with normalizing associated types. This commit
keeps all region constraints intact until the end of
TypeLivenessGenerator.add_drop_live_constraint, ensuring that normalized
types are able to re-use existing inference variables.
Fixes#47589
Fix ref-to-ptr coercions not working with NLL in certain cases
Implicit coercions from references to pointers were lowered to slightly
different Mir than explicit casts (e.g. 'foo as *mut T'). This resulted
in certain uses of self-referential structs compiling correctly when an
explicit cast was used, but not when the implicit coercion was used.
To fix this, this commit adds an outer 'Use' expr when applying a
raw-ptr-borrow adjustment. This makes the lowered Mir for coercions
identical to that of explicit coercions, allowing the original code to
compile regardless of how the raw ptr cast occurs.
Fixes#47722
Turn `type_id` into a constant intrinsic
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27745
The method `get_type_id` in `Any` is intended to support reflection. It's currently unstable in favor of using an associated constant instead. This PR makes the `type_id` intrinsic a constant intrinsic, the same as `size_of` and `align_of`, allowing `TypeId::of` to be a `const fn`, which will allow using an associated constant in `Any`.
Stabilize feature(match_beginning_vert)
With this feature stabilized, match expressions can optionally have a `|` at the beginning of each arm.
Reference PR: rust-lang-nursery/reference#231
Closes#44101
Use a range to identify SIGSEGV in stack guards
Previously, the `guard::init()` and `guard::current()` functions were
returning a `usize` address representing the top of the stack guard,
respectively for the main thread and for spawned threads. The `SIGSEGV`
handler on `unix` targets checked if a fault was within one page below that
address, if so reporting it as a stack overflow.
Now `unix` targets report a `Range<usize>` representing the guard memory,
so it can cover arbitrary guard sizes. Non-`unix` targets which always
return `None` for guards now do so with `Option<!>`, so they don't pay any
overhead.
For `linux-gnu` in particular, the previous guard upper-bound was
`stackaddr + guardsize`, as the protected memory was *inside* the stack.
This was a glibc bug, and starting from 2.27 they are moving the guard
*past* the end of the stack. However, there's no simple way for us to know
where the guard page actually lies, so now we declare it as the whole range
of `stackaddr ± guardsize`, and any fault therein will be called a stack
overflow. This fixes#47863.
decline to lint technically-unnecessary parens in function or method arguments inside of nested macros
In #46980 ("in which the unused-parens lint..." (14982db2d6)), the
unused-parens lint was made to check function and method arguments,
which it previously did not (seemingly due to oversight rather than
willful design). However, in #47775 and discussion thereon,
user–developers of Geal/nom and graphql-rust/juniper reported that the
lint was seemingly erroneously triggering on certain complex macros in
those projects. While this doesn't seem like a bug in the lint in the
particular strict sense that the expanded code would, in fact, contain
unncecessary parentheses, it also doesn't seem like the sort of thing
macro authors should have to think about: the spirit of the
unused-parens lint is to prevent needless clutter in code, not to give
macro authors extra heartache in the handling of token trees.
We propose the expediency of declining to lint unused parentheses in
function or method args inside of nested expansions: we believe that
this should eliminate the petty, troublesome lint warnings reported
in the issue, without forgoing the benefits of the lint in simpler
macros.
It seemed like too much duplicated code for the `Call` and `MethodCall`
match arms to duplicate the nested-macro check in addition to each
having their own `for` loop, so this occasioned a slight refactor so
that the function and method cases could share code—hopefully the
overall intent is at least no less clear to the gentle reader.
This is concerning #47775.
