...by adding an optimized implementation of `try_fold` and `fold` as well as replacing some unnecessary `mem::replace` calls with `MaybeUninit` helper methods.
debug-assert that the size_hint is well-formed in `collect`
Closes#137919
In the hopes of helping to catch any future accidentally-incorrect rustc or stdlib iterators (like the ones #137908 accidentally found), this has `Iterator::collect` call `size_hint` and check its `low` doesn't exceed its `Some(high)`.
There's of course a bazillion more places this *could* be checked, but the hope is that this one is a good tradeoff of being likely to catch lots of things while having minimal maintenance cost (especially compared to putting it in *every* container's `from_iter`).
Remove `#[cfg(not(test))]` gates in `core`
These gates are unnecessary now that unit tests for `core` are in a separate package, `coretests`, instead of in the same files as the source code. They previously prevented the two `core` versions from conflicting with each other.
library: Use `size_of` from the prelude instead of imported
Use `std::mem::{size_of, size_of_val, align_of, align_of_val}` from the prelude instead of importing or qualifying them.
These functions were added to all preludes in Rust 1.80.
try-job: test-various
try-job: x86_64-gnu
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
Use `std::mem::{size_of, size_of_val, align_of, align_of_val}` from the
prelude instead of importing or qualifying them.
These functions were added to all preludes in Rust 1.80.
These gates are unnecessary now that unit tests for `core` are in a
separate package, `coretests`, instead of in the same files as the
source code. They previously prevented the two `core` versions from
conflicting with each other.
Document workings of successors more clearly
This is an attempt to fix#135087 together with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135886, but I am not sure if I've succeeded in adding much clarity here, so don't be shy with your comments.
Because the neutral element of `<fNN as iter::Sum>` was changed to
`neg_zero`, the documentation needed to be updated, as it was reporting
inadequate information about what should be expected from the return.
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <workingjubilee@gmail.com>
The implementation is unsound when a partially consumed iterator has
some elements buffered in the front/back parts and cloning the Iterator
removes the capacity from the backing vec::IntoIter.
Update Code Example for `Iterator::rposition`
Added an additional assertion to the example to show the behavior of `iter.next_back` after using `iter.rposition`.
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features
This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.
Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.
The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.
Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
Since the stabilization in #127679 has reached stage0, 1.82-beta, we can
start using `&raw` freely, and even the soft-deprecated `ptr::addr_of!`
and `ptr::addr_of_mut!` can stop allowing the unstable feature.
I intentionally did not change any documentation or tests, but the rest
of those macro uses are all now using `&raw const` or `&raw mut` in the
standard library.
fix doc comments for Peekable::next_if(_eq)
Fix references to a nonexistent `consume` function in the doc comments for `Peekable::next_if` and `Peekable::next_if_eq`.
