Collect VTable stats & add `-Zprint-vtable-sizes`
This is a bit hacky/buggy, but I'm not entirely sure how to fix it, so I want to ask reviewers for help...
To try this, use either of those:
- `cargo clean && RUSTFLAGS="-Zprint-vtable-sizes" cargo +toolchain b`
- `cargo clean && cargo rustc +toolchain -Zprint-vtable-sizes`
- `rustc +toolchain -Zprint-vtable-sizes ./file.rs`
Safe Transmute: Enable handling references
This patch enables support for references in Safe Transmute, by generating nested obligations during trait selection. Specifically, when we call `confirm_transmutability_candidate(...)`, we now recursively traverse the `rustc_transmute::Answer` tree and create obligations for all the `Answer` variants, some of which include multiple nested `Answer`s.
fix(resolve): update shadowed_glob more precision
- Fixes#109153
- Fixes#109962
## Why does it panic?
We use #109153 as an illustration.
The process of `resolve_imports` is:
| Iter | resolve | resolution of **`(Mod(root), Ident(bar) in type ns)`** |
| - | - | - |
| 0 | `use foo::*` | `binding` -> foo::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> `None` |
| 1 | `use bar::bar` | `binding` -> foo::bar::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> foo::bar |
| 2 | `use bar::*` | `binding` -> foo::bar::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> foo::bar::bar::bar |
So during `finalize_import`, the `root::bar` in `use bar::bar` had been pointed to `foo::bar::bar::bar`, which is different from the `initial_module` valued of `foo::bar`, therefore, the panic had been triggered.
## Try to solve it
~I think #109153 should check-pass rather than throw an ambiguous error. Following this idea, there are two ways to solve this problem:~
~1. Give up the `initial_module` and update `import.imported_module` after each resolution update. However, I think this method may have too much impact.~
~2. Do not update the `shadowed_glob` when it is defined.~
~To be honest, I am not sure if this is the right way to solve this ICE. Perhaps there is a better resolution.~
Edit: we had made the `resolution.shadowed_glob` update more detailed.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Make struct layout not depend on unsizeable tail
fixes (after backport) https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112048
Since unsizing `Ptr<Foo<T>>` -> `Ptr<Foo<U>` just copies the pointer and adds the metadata, the layout of `Foo` must not depend on niches in and alignment of the tail `T`.
Nominating for beta 1.71, because it will have this issue: `@rustbot` label beta-nominated
Add MVP suggestion for `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn`
Rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99827
cc tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71668
No real changes since the original PR, just migrated the new suggestion to use fluent messages and added a couple more testcases, AFAICT from the discussion there were no outstanding changes requested.
Adjust UI tests for `unit_bindings` lint
- Explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Use `let () = init;` or `let pat = ();` where appropriate.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test which wasn't actually testing a closure: `tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/run_pass/disjoint-capture-in-same-closure.rs`.
Note that unfortunately there's *a lot* of UI tests, there are a couple of places where I may have left something like `let (): ()` (this is not needed but is left over from an ealier version of the lint) which is bad style.
This PR is to help with the `unit_bindings` lint at #112380.
- Create `Answer` type that is not just a type alias of `Result`
- Remove a usage of `map_layouts` to make the code easier to read
- Don't hide errors related to Unknown Layout when computing transmutability
Suggest using `ptr::null_mut` when user provided `ptr::null` to a function expecting `ptr::null_mut`
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/ptr-null-mutability-suggestions.rs:9:24
|
LL | expecting_null_mut(ptr::null());
| ------------------ ^^^^^^^^^^^
| | |
| | types differ in mutability
| | help: consider using `core::ptr::null_mut` instead: `core::ptr::null_mut()`
| arguments to this function are incorrect
|
= note: expected raw pointer `*mut u8`
found raw pointer `*const _`
note: function defined here
--> $DIR/ptr-null-mutability-suggestions.rs:6:4
|
LL | fn expecting_null_mut(_: *mut u8) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------
```
Closes#85184.
- Either explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit
type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test
Dont compute `opt_suggest_box_span` span for TAIT
Fixes#112434
Also a couple more commits on top, pruning some dead code and fixing another weird suggestion encountered in the above issue.
iat selection: normalize self ty & completely erase bound vars
Erase bound vars (most notably late-bound regions) irrespective of their binding level instead of just at the innermost one.
Fixes#111404.
Instead of linking to the old Rust Reference site on static.rust-lang.org,
link to the current website doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference instead in
diagnostic about incorrect literals.
Adjust span labels for `HIDDEN_GLOB_REEXPORTS`
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111378#issuecomment-1581226063.
### Before This PR
The possibility that the private item comes before the glob re-export was not account for, causing the span label messages to say "but private item here shadows it" before "the name `Foo` in the type namespace is supposed to be publicly re-exported here".
### After This PR
```rust
warning: private item shadows public glob re-export
--> $DIR/hidden_glob_reexports.rs:9:5
|
LL | struct Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ the private item here shadows the name `Foo` in the type namespace
...
LL | pub use self::inner::*;
| -------------- but it is supposed to be publicly re-exported here
|
= note: `#[warn(hidden_glob_reexports)]` on by default
warning: private item shadows public glob re-export
--> $DIR/hidden_glob_reexports.rs:27:9
|
LL | pub use self::inner::*;
| -------------- the name `Foo` in the type namespace is supposed to be publicly re-exported here
LL |
LL | use self::other::Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ but the private item here shadows it
```
Uplift `clippy::cmp_nan` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::cmp_nan` lint into rustc.
## `invalid_nan_comparisons`
~~(deny-by-default)~~ (warn-by-default)
The `invalid_nan_comparisons` lint checks comparison with `f32::NAN` or `f64::NAN` as one of the operand.
### Example
```rust,compile_fail
let a = 2.3f32;
if a == f32::NAN {}
```
### Explanation
NaN does not compare meaningfully to anything – not even itself – so those comparisons are always false.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
Ignore tests that hang in new solver
This makes it easier to run `--compare-mode=next-solver`, and we can revisit these tests later to find out how to make them less overflowy 😅
r? `@lcnr`
expand: Change how `#![cfg(FALSE)]` behaves on crate root
Previously it removed all other attributes from the crate root.
Now it removes only attributes below itself (during both regular expansion and pre-configuration).
So it becomes possible to configure some global crate properties even for fully unconfigured crates.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104633
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110082
increase the accuracy of effective visibilities calculation
Effective visibilities are calculated lazily due to performance restrictions. Therefore
- crate should be walked at least 1 time in `compute_effective_visibilities` pass
- Impl's should always be in the effective visibilities table
to ensure that the table is filled in correctly.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Previously it removed all other attributes from the crate root.
Now it removes only attributes below itself.
So it becomes possible to configure some global crate properties even for fully unconfigured crates.
Support float-like tuple indices in offset_of!()
Supports invocations like `offset_of!((((), ()), ()), 0.0)`. This `0.0` gets tokenized as float literal, so it has to be broken up again.
The code that did the breaking up was returning a finished `Expr`, while we need a `Ident`, so this PR splits up the `parse_expr_tuple_field_access_float` function into:
* a function that breaks up the float literal (similar to `TokenKind::break_two_token_op`, but we do access the parser during this splitting operation, so we keep it as an inherent function on the parser)
* and a function that constructs an `Expr` from it
The former we can then re-use in `offset_of` parsing. The edge cases especially involving whitespaces are tricky so this adds a bunch of new tests as well.
fixes#112204
