Rename files about error codes
fixes#60017
This PR will be failed in tidy.
<details>
<summary>The log is here:</summary>
```
tidy check
tidy error: duplicate error code: 411
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:83: __diagnostic_used!(E0411);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:84: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0411".to_owned()));
tidy error: duplicate error code: 424
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:90: debug!("smart_resolve_path_fragment: E0424, source={:?}", source);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:92: __diagnostic_used!(E0424);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:93: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0424".to_owned()));
some tidy checks failed
```
</details>
I'd like to fix this but I don't know what to do.
I will work on later. Please let me know if you have any solutions.
r? @petrochenkov
Increase `Span` from 4 bytes to 8 bytes.
This increases the size of some important types, such as `ast::Expr` and
`mir::Statement`. However, it drastically reduces how much the interner
is used, and the fields are more natural sizes that don't require bit
operations to extract.
As a result, instruction counts drop across a range of workloads, by as
much as 10% for `script-servo` incremental builds.
Peak memory usage goes up a little for some cases, but down by more for
some other cases -- as much as 18% for non-incremental builds of
`packed-simd`.
The commit also:
- removes the `repr(packed)`, because it has negligible effect, but can
cause undefined behaviour;
- replaces explicit impls of common traits (`Copy`, `PartialEq`, etc.)
with derived ones.
r? @petrochenkov
Recover from missing semicolon based on the found token
When encountering one of a few keywords when a semicolon was
expected, suggest the semicolon and recover:
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, or an operator, found `let`
--> $DIR/recover-missing-semi.rs:4:5
|
LL | let _: usize = ()
| - help: missing semicolon here
LL |
LL | let _ = 3;
| ^^^
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/recover-missing-semi.rs:2:20
|
LL | let _: usize = ()
| ^^ expected usize, found ()
|
= note: expected type `usize`
found type `()`
```
When encountering one of a few keywords when a semicolon was
expected, suggest the semicolon and recover:
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, or an operator, found `let`
--> $DIR/recover-missing-semi.rs:4:5
|
LL | let _: usize = ()
| - help: missing semicolon here
LL |
LL | let _ = 3;
| ^^^
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/recover-missing-semi.rs:2:20
|
LL | let _: usize = ()
| ^^ expected usize, found ()
|
= note: expected type `usize`
found type `()`
```
This increases the size of some important types, such as `ast::Expr` and
`mir::Statement`. However, it drastically reduces how much the interner
is used, and the fields are more natural sizes that don't require bit
operations to extract.
As a result, instruction counts drop across a range of workloads, by as
much as 12% for incremental "check" builds of `script-servo`.
Peak memory usage goes up a little for some cases, but down by more for
some other cases -- as much as 18% for non-incremental builds of
`packed-simd`.
The commit also:
- removes the `repr(packed)`, because it has negligible effect, but can
cause undefined behaviour;
- replaces explicit impls of common traits (`Copy`, `PartialEq`, etc.)
with derived ones.
Make some of lexer's API private
Lexer is a `pub` type, so it feels wrong that its fields are just pub (I guess it wasn't exported initially), so let's minimize visibility.
Context: I am looking into extracting rust-lexer into a library, which can be shared by rust-analyzer and rustc. I hope that a simple interface like `fn next_token(src: &str) -> (TokenKind, usize)` would work, but to try this out I need to understand what is the current API of the lexer.
Optimize indentation in the pretty printer.
Currently the pretty-printer calls `write!` for every space of
indentation. On some workloads the indentation level can exceed 100, and
a faster implementation reduces instruction counts by up to 7% on a few
workloads.
Currently the pretty-printer calls `write!` for every space of
indentation. On some workloads the indentation level can exceed 100, and
a faster implementation reduces instruction counts by up to 7% on a few
workloads.
