Fix non-existent-field ICE for generic fields.
I mentioned this ICE in a chat and it took about 3 milliseconds before `@eddyb` found the problem and said this change would fix it. :)
This also changes one the field types in the related test to one that triggered the ICE.
Fixes#81627.
Fixes#81672.
Fixes#81709.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81480 `@b-naber` `@estebank.`
Remove incorrect `delay_span_bug`
The following code is supposed to compile
```rust
use std::ops::BitOr;
pub trait IntWrapper {
type InternalStorage;
}
impl<T> BitOr for dyn IntWrapper<InternalStorage = T>
where
Self: Sized,
T: BitOr + BitOr<Output = T>,
{
type Output = Self;
fn bitor(self, _other: Self) -> Self {
todo!()
}
}
```
Before this change it would ICE. In #70998 the removed logic was added
to provide better suggestions, and the `delay_span_bug` guard was added
to protect against a potential logic error when returning traits. As it
happens, there are cases, like the one above, where traits can indeed be
returned, so valid code was being rejected.
Fix (but not close) #80207.
make const_err a future incompat lint
This is the first step for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800: make const_err a future-incompat lint. I also rewrote the const_err lint description as the old one seemed wrong.
This has the unfortunate side-effect of making const-eval error even more verbose by making the const_err message longer without fixing the redundancy caused by additionally emitting an error on each use site of the constant. We cannot fix that redundancy until const_err is a *hard* error (at that point the error-on-use-site can be turned into a `delay_span_bug!` for uses of monomorphic consts, and into a nicely rendered error for [lazily / post-monomorhization evaluated] associated consts).
~~The one annoying effect of this PR is that `let _x = &(1/(1-1));` now also shows the future-incompat warning, even though of course we will *not* make this a hard error. We'll instead (hopefully) stop promoting it -- see https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3027. The only way I see to avoid the future-incompat warning is to use a different lint for "failure to evaluate promoted".~~
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
The following code is supposed to compile
```rust
use std::ops::BitOr;
pub trait IntWrapper {
type InternalStorage;
}
impl<T> BitOr for dyn IntWrapper<InternalStorage = T>
where
Self: Sized,
T: BitOr + BitOr<Output = T>,
{
type Output = Self;
fn bitor(self, _other: Self) -> Self {
todo!()
}
}
```
Before this change it would ICE. In #70998 the removed logic was added
to provide better suggestions, and the `delay_span_bug` guard was added
to protect against a potential logic error when returning traits. As it
happens, there are cases, like the one above, where traits can indeed be
returned, so valid code was being rejected.
Fix#80207.
Add a new ABI to support cmse_nonsecure_call
This adds support for the `cmse_nonsecure_call` feature to be able to perform non-secure function call.
See the discussion on Zulip [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Support.20for.20callsite.20attributes/near/223054928).
This is a followup to #75810 which added `cmse_nonsecure_entry`. As for that PR, I assume that the changes are small enough to not have to go through a RFC but I don't mind doing one if needed 😃
I did not yet create a tracking issue, but if most of it is fine, I can create one and update the various files accordingly (they refer to the other tracking issue now).
On the Zulip chat, I believe `@jonas-schievink` volunteered to be a reviewer 💯
Update test-various to Ubuntu 20.04
The test command-setgroups.rs is adjusted to skip on musl, where `sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX)` always returns a dummy value of 32, even though the actual value is 65536. I'm not sure why this only became a problem now, as the information I found indicates that this value changed in kernel version 2.6.4, which is ages ago.
I'm a bit unsure whether this one will go through, because I locally also saw a failure in std-backtrace.rs which went away on subsequent runs, and also had port assignment failures, but I think those might be on my side. I'm kind of curious how the code in b122908617/library/std/src/net/test.rs (L43-L56) is supposed to work, as the directory names it checks don't seem to appear anywhere else.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Improve wording of suggestion about accessing field
Follow-up to #81504
The compiler at this moment suggests "you might have meant to use field `b` of type `B`", sounding like it's type `B` which has the field `b`.
r? ```@estebank```
Fix bug with assert!() calling the wrong edition of panic!().
The span of `panic!` produced by the `assert` macro did not carry the right edition. This changes `assert` to call the right version.
Also adds tests for the 2021 edition of panic and assert, that would've caught this.
Add better diagnostic for unbounded Abst. Const
~~In the case where a generic abst. const requires a trivial where bound: `where TypeWithConst<const_fn(N)>: ,`,
instead of requiring a where bound, just check that only consts are being substituted in to skip over where check.~~
~~This is pretty sketchy, but I think it works. Presumably, if there is checking for type bounds added later, it can first check nested requirements, and see if they're satisfied by the current `ParamEnv`.~~
Changed the diagnostic to add a better example, which is more practical than what was previously proposed.
r? ```@lcnr```
Fixes#81531
When we buffer an early lint for a macro invocation,
we need to determine which NodeId to take the lint level from.
Currently, we use the `NodeId` of the closest def parent. However, if
the macro invocation is inside the desugared closure from an `async fn`
or async closure, that `NodeId` does not actually exist in the AST.
This commit explicitly calls `check_lint` for the `NodeId`s of closures
desugared from async expressions, ensuring that we do not miss any
buffered lints.
This commit adds a new ABI to be selected via `extern
"C-cmse-nonsecure-call"` on function pointers in order for the compiler to
apply the corresponding cmse_nonsecure_call callsite attribute.
For Armv8-M targets supporting TrustZone-M, this will perform a
non-secure function call by saving, clearing and calling a non-secure
function pointer using the BLXNS instruction.
See the page on the unstable book for details.
Signed-off-by: Hugues de Valon <hugues.devalon@arm.com>
Improve handling of spans around macro result parse errors
Fixes#81543
After we expand a macro, we try to parse the resulting tokens as a AST
node. This commit makes several improvements to how we handle spans when
an error occurs:
* Only ovewrite the original `Span` if it's a dummy span. This preserves
a more-specific span if one is available.
* Use `self.prev_token` instead of `self.token` when emitting an error
message after encountering EOF, since an EOF token always has a dummy
span
* Make `SourceMap::next_point` leave dummy spans unused. A dummy span
does not have a logical 'next point', since it's a zero-length span.
Re-using the span span preserves its 'dummy-ness' for other checks
Add some tests for associated-type-bounds issues
Closes#38917Closes#40093Closes#43475Closes#63591#47897 is likely closable too, but it needs an MCVE
~~#38917, #40093, #43475, #47897 all are mislabeled and shouldn't have the `F-associated-type-bounds` label~~
~~#71685 is also mislabeled as commented on in that thread~~
Add lint for 2229 migrations
Implements the first for RFC 2229 where we make the decision to migrate a root variable based on if the type of the variable needs Drop and if the root variable would be moved into the closure when the feature isn't enabled.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Fix primitive search in parameters and returned values
Part of #60485.
Fixes#74780.
Replacing #74879.
cc `@camelid` `@jyn514` `@CraftSpider`
r? `@ollie27`
- This allows us add fake information after handling migrations if
needed.
- Capture analysis also priortizes what we see earlier, which means
fake information should go in last.
Add visitors for checking #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with struct field
Fix test for #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with #[macro_export] macro
Add visitors for checking #[inline] without #[macro_export] macro
Add use alias with Visitor
Fix lint error
Reduce unnecessary variable
Co-authored-by: LingMan <LingMan@users.noreply.github.com>
Change error to warning
Add warning for checking field, arm with #[allow_internal_unstable]
Add name resolver
Formatting
Formatting
Fix error fixture
Add checking field, arm, macro def
Add error message for private fn
Attempts to add a more detailed error when a `const_evaluatable` fn from another scope is used inside of a scope which cannot access it.
r? ````@lcnr````
Fixes#81543
After we expand a macro, we try to parse the resulting tokens as a AST
node. This commit makes several improvements to how we handle spans when
an error occurs:
* Only ovewrite the original `Span` if it's a dummy span. This preserves
a more-specific span if one is available.
* Use `self.prev_token` instead of `self.token` when emitting an error
message after encountering EOF, since an EOF token always has a dummy
span
* Make `SourceMap::next_point` leave dummy spans unused. A dummy span
does not have a logical 'next point', since it's a zero-length span.
Re-using the span span preserves its 'dummy-ness' for other checks
Add a test for #71202Closes#71202
---
Note that the test normally generates this warning:
```
warning: cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types
--> test.rs:10:5
|
10 | / const ITEM_IS_COPY: [(); 1 - {
11 | | trait NotCopy {
12 | | const VALUE: bool = false;
13 | | }
... |
26 | | <IsCopy<T>>::VALUE
27 | | } as usize] = [];
| |_____________________^
|
= note: `#[warn(const_evaluatable_unchecked)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #76200 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76200>
```
I added `allow(const_evaluatable_unchecked)`, but maybe we just don't want to add a test for this as the program is not really valid?
Remove const_in_array_repeat
Fixes#80371. Fixes#81315. Fixes#80767. Fixes#75682.
I thought there might be some issue with `Repeats(_, 0)`, but if you increase the items in the array it still ICEs. I'm not sure if this is the best fix but it does fix the given issue.
