Ignore less tests in debug builds
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120594 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120863, nearly all UB-detecting debug assertions get compiled out of code that is monomorphized by a crate built with debug assertions disabled.
Which means that if we default all our codegen tests to `-Cdebug-assertions=no`, most of them work just fine against a sysroot built with debug assertions.
I also tried to explain a bit better why some tests need to be skipped, for those that still need to be skipped.
Explicitly call `emit_stashed_diagnostics`.
Commit 72b172b in #121206 changed things so that
`emit_stashed_diagnostics` is only called from `run_compiler`. But rustfmt doesn't use `run_compiler`, so it needs to call `emit_stashed_diagnostics` itself to avoid an abort in `DiagCtxtInner::drop` when stashed diagnostics occur.
Fixes#121450.
r? `@oli-obk`
Move as many tests from tests/ui/numbers-arithmetic to tests/ui/lint as possible
Fixes#119851 , and also consolidates as many individual tests as possible from numbers-arithmetic. I might have moved the tests in too aggressively, so let me know
Commit 72b172b in #121206 changed things so that
`emit_stashed_diagnostics` is only called from `run_compiler`. But
rustfmt doesn't use `run_compiler`, so it needs to call
`emit_stashed_diagnostics` itself to avoid an abort in
`DiagCtxtInner::drop` when stashed diagnostics occur.
Fixes#121450.
Consistently refer to a test's `revision` instead of `cfg`
Compiletest allows a test file to specify multiple “revisions” (`//@ revisions: foo bar`), with each revision running as a separate test, and having the ability to define revision-specific headers (`//`@[foo]` ignore-blah`) and revision-specific code (`#[cfg(foo)]`).
The code that implements this feature sometimes uses the term “cfg” instead of “revision”. This results in two confusingly-different names for the same concept, one of which is ambiguous with other kinds of configuration (such as compiletest's own config).
This PR replaces those occurrences of `cfg` with `revision`, so that one name is used consistently.
rename ptr::invalid -> ptr::without_provenance
It has long bothered me that `ptr::invalid` returns a pointer that is actually valid for zero-sized memory accesses. In general, it doesn't even make sense to ask "is this pointer valid", you have to ask "is this pointer valid for a given memory access". We could say that a pointer is invalid if it is not valid for *any* memory access, but [the way this FCP is going](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/472), it looks like *all* pointers will be valid for zero-sized memory accesses.
Two possible alternative names emerged as people's favorites:
1. Something involving `dangling`, in analogy to `NonNull::dangling`. To avoid inconsistency with the `NonNull` method, the address-taking method could be called `dangling_at(addr: usize) -> *const T`.
2. `without_provenance`, to be symmetric with the inverse operation `ptr.addr_without_provenance()` (currently still called `ptr.addr()` but probably going to be renamed)
I have no idea which one of these is better. I read [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117658#issuecomment-1830934701) as expressing a slight preference for something like the second option, so I went for that. I'm happy to go with `dangling_at` as well.
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem`
compiletest: support auxiliaries with auxiliaries
To test behaviour that depends on the extern options of intermediate crates, compiletest auxiliaries must have their own auxiliaries.
Auxiliary compilation previously did not trigger compilation of any auxiliaries in the auxiliary's headers. In addition, those auxiliaries would need to be in an `auxiliary/auxiliary` directory, which is unnecessary and makes some crate graphs harder to write tests for, such as when A depends on B and C, and B depends on C.
For a test `tests/ui/$path/root.rs`, with the following crate graph:
```
root
|-- grandparent
`-- parent
`-- grandparent
```
then the intermediate outputs from compiletest will be:
```
build/$target/test/ui/$path/
|-- auxiliary
| |-- libgrandparent.dylib
| |-- libparent.dylib
| |-- grandparent
| | |-- grandparent.err
| | `-- grandparent.out
| `-- parent
| |-- parent.err
| `-- parent.out
|-- libroot.rmeta
|-- root.err
`-- root.out
```
To test behaviour that depends on the extern options of intermediate
crates, compiletest auxiliaries must have their own auxiliaries.
Auxiliary compilation previously did not trigger compilation of any
auxiliaries in the auxiliary's headers. In addition, those auxiliaries
would need to be in an `auxiliary/auxiliary` directory, which is
unnecessary and makes some crate graphs harder to write tests for,
such as when A depends on B and C, and B depends on C.
For a test `tests/ui/$path/root.rs`, with the following crate graph:
```
root
|-- grandparent
`-- parent
`-- grandparent
```
then the intermediate outputs from compiletest will be:
```
build/$target/test/ui/$path/
|-- auxiliary
| |-- libgrandparent.dylib
| |-- libparent.dylib
| |-- grandparent
| | |-- grandparent.err
| | `-- grandparent.out
| `-- parent
| |-- parent.err
| `-- parent.out
|-- libroot.rmeta
|-- root.err
`-- root.out
```
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Compiletest code sometimes refers to a test's revision as its `cfg`. This
results in two different names for the same thing, one of which is ambiguous
with other kinds of configuration (such as compiletest's own config).
This patch replaces those occurrences of `cfg` with `revision`.
Print proper relative path for descriptive name check
The `stripped_path` starts with `ui/...`, while we are mostly working in `rust` directory.
print a relative path starting with `tests/ui/...` so that we can copy and use the path when renaming.
Hardcoding the `tests` maybe not good style, but seems we have a lot of hardcoded `tests/..` paths in tidy check :(.
Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect
In certain cases like #121330, it is possible to have more than one suggestion from the `ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons` lint (which before this PR are `MachineApplicable`). When this gets passed to rustfix, rustfix makes *multiple* changes according to the suggestions which result in incorrect code.
This is a temporary workaround. The real long term solution to problems like these is to address <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53934>.
This PR also includes a drive-by edit to the panic message emitted by compiletest because "ui" test suite now uses `//`@`` directives.
Fixes#121330.
wasm: Store rlib metadata in wasm object files
The goal of this commit is to remove warnings using LLVM tip-of-tree `wasm-ld`. In llvm/llvm-project#78658 the `wasm-ld` LLD driver no longer looks at archive indices and instead looks at all the objects in archives. Previously `lib.rmeta` files were simply raw rustc metadata bytes, not wasm objects, meaning that `wasm-ld` would emit a warning indicating so.
WebAssembly targets previously passed `--fatal-warnings` to `wasm-ld` by default which meant that if Rust were to update to LLVM 18 then all wasm targets would not work. This immediate blocker was resolved in rust-lang/rust#120278 which removed `--fatal-warnings` which enabled a theoretical update to LLVM 18 for wasm targets. This current state is ok-enough for now because rustc squashes all linker output by default if it doesn't fail. This means, for example, that rustc squashes all the linker warnings coming out of `wasm-ld` about `lib.rmeta` files with LLVM 18. This again isn't a pressing issue because the information is all hidden, but it runs the risk of being annoying if another linker error were to happen and then the output would have all these unrelated warnings that couldn't be fixed.
Thus, this PR comes into the picture. The goal of this PR is to resolve these warnings by using the WebAssembly object file format on wasm targets instead of using raw rustc metadata. When I first implemented the rlib-in-objects scheme in #84449 I remember either concluding that `wasm-ld` would either include the metadata in the output or I thought we didn't have to do anything there at all. I think I was wrong on both counts as `wasm-ld` does not include the metadata in the final output unless the object is referenced and we do actually need to do something to resolve these warnings.
This PR updates the object file format containing rustc metadata on WebAssembly targets to be an actual WebAssembly file. To avoid bringing in any new dependencies I've opted to hand-code this encoding at this time. If the object gets more complicated though it'd probably be best to pull in `wasmparser` and `wasm-encoder`. For now though there's two adjacent functions reading/writing wasm.
The only caveat I know of with this is that if `wasm-ld` does indeed look at the object file then the metadata will be included in the final output. I believe the only thing that could cause that at this time is `--whole-archive` which I don't think is passed for rlibs. I would clarify that I'm not 100% certain about this, however.
The goal of this commit is to remove warnings using LLVM tip-of-tree
`wasm-ld`. In llvm/llvm-project#78658 the `wasm-ld` LLD driver no longer
looks at archive indices and instead looks at all the objects in
archives. Previously `lib.rmeta` files were simply raw rustc metadata
bytes, not wasm objects, meaning that `wasm-ld` would emit a warning
indicating so.
WebAssembly targets previously passed `--fatal-warnings` to `wasm-ld` by
default which meant that if Rust were to update to LLVM 18 then all wasm
targets would not work. This immediate blocker was resolved in
rust-lang/rust#120278 which removed `--fatal-warnings` which enabled a
theoretical update to LLVM 18 for wasm targets. This current state is
ok-enough for now because rustc squashes all linker output by default if
it doesn't fail. This means, for example, that rustc squashes all the
linker warnings coming out of `wasm-ld` about `lib.rmeta` files with
LLVM 18. This again isn't a pressing issue because the information is
all hidden, but it runs the risk of being annoying if another linker
error were to happen and then the output would have all these unrelated
warnings that couldn't be fixed.
Thus, this PR comes into the picture. The goal of this PR is to resolve
these warnings by using the WebAssembly object file format on wasm
targets instead of using raw rustc metadata. When I first implemented
the rlib-in-objects scheme in #84449 I remember either concluding that
`wasm-ld` would either include the metadata in the output or I thought
we didn't have to do anything there at all. I think I was wrong on both
counts as `wasm-ld` does not include the metadata in the final output
unless the object is referenced and we do actually need to do something
to resolve these warnings.
This PR updates the object file format containing rustc metadata on
WebAssembly targets to be an actual WebAssembly file. This enables the
`wasm` feature of the `object` crate to be able to read the custom
section in the same manner as other platforms, but currently `object`
doesn't support writing wasm object files so a handwritten encoder is
used instead.
The only caveat I know of with this is that if `wasm-ld` does indeed
look at the object file then the metadata will be included in the final
output. I believe the only thing that could cause that at this time is
`--whole-archive` which I don't think is passed for rlibs. I would
clarify that I'm not 100% certain about this, however.
Overhaul `Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder`
Implements the first part of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/722, which moves functionality and use away from `Diagnostic`, onto `DiagnosticBuilder`.
Likely follow-ups:
- Move things around, because this PR was written to minimize diff size, so some things end up in sub-optimal places. E.g. `DiagnosticBuilder` has impls in both `diagnostic.rs` and `diagnostic_builder.rs`.
- Rename `Diagnostic` as `DiagInner` and `DiagnosticBuilder` as `Diag`.
r? `@davidtwco`
Always evaluate free constants and statics, even if previous errors occurred
work towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79738
We will need to evaluate static items before the `definitions.freeze()` below, as we will start creating new `DefId`s (for nested allocations) within the `eval_static_initializer` query.
But even without that motivation, this is a good change. Hard errors should always be reported and not silenced if other errors happened earlier.
Move the extra directives for `Mode::CoverageRun` into `iter_header`
When these extra directives were ported over as part of #112300, it made sense to introduce `iter_header_extra` and pass them in as an extra argument.
But now that #120881 has added a `mode` parameter to `iter_header` for its own purposes, it's slightly simpler to move the coverage special-case code directly into `iter_header` as well. This lets us get rid of `iter_header_extra`.
Change leak check and suspicious auto trait lint warning messages
The leak check lint message "this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!" is misleading as some cases may not be phased out and could end being accepted. This is under discussion still.
The suspicious auto trait lint the change in behavior already happened, so the new message is probably more accurate.
r? `@lcnr`
Closes#93367
Reimpl meaningful test name lint MCP658
This reintroduces the tidy rule originally proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113583 that then became an MCP in https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/658 which eventually surfaced a quite-reasonable request for a diagnostic enhancement. I have added that to the rule. It produces output like this:
```
tidy error: file `ui/unsized/issue-115809.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-115809.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/unsized/issue-115203.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-115203.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-113860-2.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-113860.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-117997.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-117997.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-119463.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-119463.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/auxiliary/issue-117997.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-117997.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/auxiliary/issue-119463-extern.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-119463.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-113860-1.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-113860.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/privacy/issue-113860.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-113860.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/const_kind_expr/issue_114151.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-114151.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/did_you_mean/issue-114112.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-114112.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/did_you_mean/issue-105225.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-105225.rs`
tidy error: file `ui/did_you_mean/issue-105225-named-args.rs` must begin with a descriptive name, try `{reason}-issue-105225.rs`
```
You get the idea.
There are some tests which merely would require reordering of the name according to the rule. I could modify the diagnostic further to identify those, but doing such would make it prone to bad suggestions. I have opted to trust contributors to recognize the diagnostic is robotic, as the pattern we are linting on is easier to match if we do not speculate on what parts of the name are meaningful: sometimes a word is a reason, but sometimes it is a mere "tag", such as with a pair like:
- issue-314159265-blue.rs
- issue-314159265-red.rs
Starting them with `red-` and `blue-` means they do not sort together, despite being related, and the color names are still not very descriptive. Recognizing a good name is an open-ended task, though this pair might be:
- colored-circle-gen-blue.rs
- colored-circle-gen-red.rs
Deciding exactly *how* to solve this is not the business of tidy, only recognizing a what.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Currently many diagnostic modifier methods are available on both
`Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder`. This commit removes most of them
from `Diagnostic`. To minimize the diff size, it keeps them within
`diagnostic.rs` but changes the surrounding `impl Diagnostic` block to
`impl DiagnosticBuilder`. (I intend to move things around later, to give
a more sensible code layout.)
`Diagnostic` keeps a few methods that it still needs, like `sub`,
`arg`, and `replace_args`.
The `forward!` macro, which defined two additional methods per call
(e.g. `note` and `with_note`), is replaced by the `with_fn!` macro,
which defines one additional method per call (e.g. `with_note`). It's
now also only used when necessary -- not all modifier methods currently
need a `with_*` form. (New ones can be easily added as necessary.)
All this also requires changing `trait AddToDiagnostic` so its methods
take `DiagnosticBuilder` instead of `Diagnostic`, which leads to many
mechanical changes. `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` gains a type parameter `G`.
There are three subdiagnostics -- `DelayedAtWithoutNewline`,
`DelayedAtWithNewline`, and `InvalidFlushedDelayedDiagnosticLevel` --
that are created within the diagnostics machinery and appended to
external diagnostics. These are handled at the `Diagnostic` level, which
means it's now hard to construct them via `derive(Diagnostic)`, so
instead we construct them by hand. This has no effect on what they look
like when printed.
There are lots of new `allow` markers for `untranslatable_diagnostics`
and `diagnostics_outside_of_impl`. This is because
`#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` annotations were present on the `Diagnostic`
modifier methods, but missing from the `DiagnosticBuilder` modifier
methods. They're now present.
There are lots of functions that modify a diagnostic. This can be via a
`&mut Diagnostic` or a `&mut DiagnosticBuilder`, because the latter type
wraps the former and impls `DerefMut`.
This commit converts all the `&mut Diagnostic` occurrences to `&mut
DiagnosticBuilder`. This is a step towards greatly simplifying
`Diagnostic`. Some of the relevant function are made generic, because
they deal with both errors and warnings. No function bodies are changed,
because all the modifier methods are available on both `Diagnostic` and
`DiagnosticBuilder`.
Reduce monomorphisation bloat in small_c_string
This is a code path usually next to an FFI call, so taking the `dyn` slowdown for the 1159 llvm-line (fat lto, codegen-units 1, release build) drop in my testing program [t2fanrd](https://github.com/GnomedDev/t2fanrd) is worth it imo.
