Add MVP suggestion for `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn`
Rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99827
cc tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71668
No real changes since the original PR, just migrated the new suggestion to use fluent messages and added a couple more testcases, AFAICT from the discussion there were no outstanding changes requested.
Adjust UI tests for `unit_bindings` lint
- Explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Use `let () = init;` or `let pat = ();` where appropriate.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test which wasn't actually testing a closure: `tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/run_pass/disjoint-capture-in-same-closure.rs`.
Note that unfortunately there's *a lot* of UI tests, there are a couple of places where I may have left something like `let (): ()` (this is not needed but is left over from an ealier version of the lint) which is bad style.
This PR is to help with the `unit_bindings` lint at #112380.
Suggest using `ptr::null_mut` when user provided `ptr::null` to a function expecting `ptr::null_mut`
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/ptr-null-mutability-suggestions.rs:9:24
|
LL | expecting_null_mut(ptr::null());
| ------------------ ^^^^^^^^^^^
| | |
| | types differ in mutability
| | help: consider using `core::ptr::null_mut` instead: `core::ptr::null_mut()`
| arguments to this function are incorrect
|
= note: expected raw pointer `*mut u8`
found raw pointer `*const _`
note: function defined here
--> $DIR/ptr-null-mutability-suggestions.rs:6:4
|
LL | fn expecting_null_mut(_: *mut u8) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------
```
Closes#85184.
- Either explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit
type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test
Dont compute `opt_suggest_box_span` span for TAIT
Fixes#112434
Also a couple more commits on top, pruning some dead code and fixing another weird suggestion encountered in the above issue.
iat selection: normalize self ty & completely erase bound vars
Erase bound vars (most notably late-bound regions) irrespective of their binding level instead of just at the innermost one.
Fixes#111404.
rustdoc: re-elide cross-crate default trait-object lifetime bounds
Hide trait-object lifetime bounds (re-exported from an external crate) if they coincide with [their default](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/lifetime-elision.html#default-trait-object-lifetimes).
Partially addresses #44306. Follow-up to #103885. [Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/clean_middle_ty.3A.20I.20need.20to.20add.20a.20parameter/near/307143097).
Most notably, if `std` exported something from `core` containing a type like `Box<dyn Fn()>`, then it would now be rendered as `Box<dyn Fn(), Global>` instead of `Box<dyn Fn() + 'static, Global>` (hiding `+ 'static` as it is the default in this case). Showing `Global` here is a separate issue, #80379, which is on my agenda.
Note that I am not really fond of the fact that I had to add a parameter to such a widely used function (30+ call sites) to address such a niche bug.
CC `@GuillaumeGomez`
Requesting a review from a compiler contributor or team member as recommended on Zulip.
r? compiler
---
`@rustbot` label T-compiler T-rustdoc A-cross-crate-reexports
Instead of linking to the old Rust Reference site on static.rust-lang.org,
link to the current website doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference instead in
diagnostic about incorrect literals.
Adjust span labels for `HIDDEN_GLOB_REEXPORTS`
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111378#issuecomment-1581226063.
### Before This PR
The possibility that the private item comes before the glob re-export was not account for, causing the span label messages to say "but private item here shadows it" before "the name `Foo` in the type namespace is supposed to be publicly re-exported here".
### After This PR
```rust
warning: private item shadows public glob re-export
--> $DIR/hidden_glob_reexports.rs:9:5
|
LL | struct Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ the private item here shadows the name `Foo` in the type namespace
...
LL | pub use self::inner::*;
| -------------- but it is supposed to be publicly re-exported here
|
= note: `#[warn(hidden_glob_reexports)]` on by default
warning: private item shadows public glob re-export
--> $DIR/hidden_glob_reexports.rs:27:9
|
LL | pub use self::inner::*;
| -------------- the name `Foo` in the type namespace is supposed to be publicly re-exported here
LL |
LL | use self::other::Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ but the private item here shadows it
```
Uplift `clippy::cmp_nan` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::cmp_nan` lint into rustc.
## `invalid_nan_comparisons`
~~(deny-by-default)~~ (warn-by-default)
The `invalid_nan_comparisons` lint checks comparison with `f32::NAN` or `f64::NAN` as one of the operand.
### Example
```rust,compile_fail
let a = 2.3f32;
if a == f32::NAN {}
```
### Explanation
NaN does not compare meaningfully to anything – not even itself – so those comparisons are always false.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
Ignore tests that hang in new solver
This makes it easier to run `--compare-mode=next-solver`, and we can revisit these tests later to find out how to make them less overflowy 😅
r? `@lcnr`
Change format of rustdoc-js tests by putting query and correction directly alongside the expected values
As I was working on fixing merge conflicts in #108537, I faced quite a big issue when trying to update the `rustdoc-js*` tests. To make it much simpler, this PR moves the `query` and `correction` directly alongside the expected data so now we know what is the query that is being run without needing to add comments or going back to the top of the file.
r? ```@notriddle```
expand: Change how `#![cfg(FALSE)]` behaves on crate root
Previously it removed all other attributes from the crate root.
Now it removes only attributes below itself (during both regular expansion and pre-configuration).
So it becomes possible to configure some global crate properties even for fully unconfigured crates.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104633
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110082
increase the accuracy of effective visibilities calculation
Effective visibilities are calculated lazily due to performance restrictions. Therefore
- crate should be walked at least 1 time in `compute_effective_visibilities` pass
- Impl's should always be in the effective visibilities table
to ensure that the table is filled in correctly.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Previously it removed all other attributes from the crate root.
Now it removes only attributes below itself.
So it becomes possible to configure some global crate properties even for fully unconfigured crates.
