When suggesting associated fn with type parameters, include in the structured suggestion
Address #50734.
```
error[E0046]: not all trait items implemented, missing: `foo`, `bar`, `baz`
--> file.rs:14:1
|
14 | impl TraitA<()> for S {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `foo`, `bar`, `baz` in implementation
|
= help: implement the missing item: `fn foo<T>(_: T) -> Self where T: TraitB, TraitB::Item = A { unimplemented!() }`
= help: implement the missing item: `fn bar<T>(_: T) -> Self { unimplemented!() }`
= help: implement the missing item: `fn baz<T>(_: T) -> Self where T: TraitB, <T as TraitB>::Item: std::marker::Copy { unimplemented!() }`
```
It doesn't work well for associated types with `ty::Predicate::Projection`s as we need to resugar `T: Trait, Trait::Assoc = K` → `T: Trait<Assoc = K>`.
Unfortunately, the diagnotic machinery does not cope well with an empty
span which can happen if the crate is empty, in which case we merely set
a spanless note.
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `X` is non-empty
--> file.rs:9:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
| | - variant not covered
3 | | B,
| | - variant not covered
4 | | C,
| | - variant not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
9 | match x {
| ^
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
--> file.rs:11:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
3 | | B,
4 | | C,
| | - not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
11 | match x {
| ^ patterns `C` not covered
```
When a match expression doesn't have patterns covering every variant,
point at the enum's definition span. On a best effort basis, point at the
variant(s) that are missing. This does not handle the case when the missing
pattern is due to a field's enum variants:
```
enum E1 {
A,
B,
C,
}
enum E2 {
A(E1),
B,
}
fn foo() {
match E2::A(E1::A) {
E2::A(E1::B) => {}
E2::B => {}
}
//~^ ERROR `E2::A(E1::A)` and `E2::A(E1::C)` not handled
}
```
Unify look between match with no arms and match with some missing patterns.
Fix#37518.
I also added `// skip-codegen` to each one, to address potential concerns
that this change would otherwise slow down our test suite spending time
generating code for files that are really just meant to be checks of
compiler diagnostics.
(However, I will say: My preference is to not use `// skip-codegen` if
one can avoid it. We can use all the testing of how we drive LLVM that
we can get...)
(Updated post rebase.)
