replace broken links armv7-rtems-eabihf.md
Hi team , i found broken link in `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/armv7-rtems-eabihf.md` and replace
thanks
Make target maintainers more easily pingable
Put them all on the same line with just their GitHub handles to make it very easy to copy and paste (with ctrl-shift-v!!!) the names.
We have no use for email, so I removed all the emails, we don't care about people's full names either.
This is a pretty big PR with lots of changes. I may have gotten one or two wrong, who knows. I went over it fairly aggressively, removing all information I deemed unnecessary.
> [!Caution]
> When copying these usernames, use **ctrl-shift-v** to avoid pasting them as links
r? RalfJung you indirectly asked for this :) (anyone is welcome to review)
Add target-specific NaN payloads for the missing tier 2 targets
This PR adds target-specific NaN payloads for the remaining tier 2 targets:
- `arm64ec`: This target is a mix of `x86_64` and `aarch64`, meaning as they both have no extra payloads `arm64ec` also has no extra payloads.
- `loongarch64`: Per [LoongArch Reference Manual - Volume 1: Basic Architecture](https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation/releases/download/2023.04.20/LoongArch-Vol1-v1.10-EN.pdf) section 3.1.1.3, LoongArch does quieting NaN propagation with the Rust preferred NaN as its default NaN, meaning it has no extra payloads.
- `nvptx64`: Per [PTX ISA documentation](https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/parallel-thread-execution/index.html#floating-point-instructions) section 9.7.3 (and section 9.7.4 for `f16`), all payloads are possible. The documentation explicitly states that `f16` and `f32` operations result in an unspecified NaN payload, while for `f64` it states "NaN payloads are supported" without specifying how or what payload will be generated if there are no input NaNs.
- `powerpc` and `powerpc64`: Per [Power Instruction Set Architecture](https://files.openpower.foundation/s/9izgC5Rogi5Ywmm/download/OPF_PowerISA_v3.1C.pdf) Book I section 4.3.2, PowerPC does quieting NaN propagation with the Rust preferred NaN being generated if no there are no input NaNs, meaning it has no extra payloads.
- `s390x`: Per [IBM z/Architecture Principles of Operation](https://www.vm.ibm.com/library/other/22783213.pdf#page=965) page 9-3, s390x does quieting NaN propagation with the Rust's preferred NaN as its default NaN, meaning it has no extra payloads.
Tracking issue: #128288
cc ``@RalfJung``
``@rustbot`` label +T-lang
Also cc relevant target maintainers of tier 2 targets:
- `arm64ec`: ``@dpaoliello``
- `loongarch64`: ``@heiher`` ``@xiangzhai`` ``@zhaixiaojuan`` ``@xen0n``
- `nvptx64`: ``@RDambrosio016`` ``@kjetilkjeka``
- `powerpc`: the only documented maintainer is ``@BKPepe`` for the tier 3 `powerpc-unknown-linux-muslspe`.
- `powerpc64`: ``@daltenty`` ``@gilamn5tr`` ``@Gelbpunkt`` ``@famfo`` ``@neuschaefer``
- `s390x`: ``@uweigand`` ``@cuviper``
Put them all on the same line with just their GitHub handles to make it
very easy to copy and paste (with ctrl-shift-v!!!) the names.
We have no use for email, so I removed all the emails, we don't care
about people's full names either.
Co-authored-by: Thalia Archibald <thalia@archibald.dev>
Switch exploit mitigations to mdbook footnotes
This updates the exploit mitigations chapter in the rustc book to use the footnote feature of mdbook instead of manually implementing footnotes with HTML.
transmutability: remove NFA intermediate representation
Prior to this commit, the transmutability analysis used an intermediate NFA representation of type layout. We then determinized this representation into a DFA, upon which we ran the core transmutability analysis. Unfortunately, determinizing NFAs is expensive. In this commit, we avoid NFAs entirely by observing that Rust `union`s are the only source of nondeterminism and that it is comparatively cheap to compute the DFA union of DFAs.
We also implement Graphviz DOT debug formatting of DFAs.
Fixesrust-lang/project-safe-transmute#23Fixesrust-lang/project-safe-transmute#24
r? ``@compiler-errors``
simd intrinsics with mask: accept unsigned integer masks, and fix some of the errors
It's not clear at all why the mask would have to be signed, it is anyway interpreted bitwise. The backend should just make sure that works no matter the surface-level type; our LLVM backend already does this correctly. The note of "the mask may be widened, which only has the correct behavior for signed integers" explains... nothing? Why can't the code do the widening correctly? If necessary, just cast to the signed type first...
Also while we are at it, fix the errors. For simd_masked_load/store, the errors talked about the "third argument" but they meant the first argument (the mask is the first argument there). They also used the wrong type for `expected_element`.
I have extremely low confidence in the GCC part of this PR.
See [discussion on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/257879-project-portable-simd/topic/On.20the.20sign.20of.20masks)
simd intrinsics with mask: accept unsigned integer masks, and fix some of the errors
It's not clear at all why the mask would have to be signed, it is anyway interpreted bitwise. The backend should just make sure that works no matter the surface-level type; our LLVM backend already does this correctly. The note of "the mask may be widened, which only has the correct behavior for signed integers" explains... nothing? Why can't the code do the widening correctly? If necessary, just cast to the signed type first...
Also while we are at it, fix the errors. For simd_masked_load/store, the errors talked about the "third argument" but they meant the first argument (the mask is the first argument there). They also used the wrong type for `expected_element`.
I have extremely low confidence in the GCC part of this PR.
See [discussion on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/257879-project-portable-simd/topic/On.20the.20sign.20of.20masks)
Many contributions to compiler-builtins don't have any need to touch
libm, and could get by with the few minutes of CI for compiler-builtins
rather than the ~30 minutes for libm. We already have some scripts that
handle changed file detection, so expand its use to skip libm CI if it
doesn't need to run.
